Quantcast
Channel: EHSQL(Environment-Energy ,Health,Safety, Security and Social Ac. ,Quality-Lab) Technical services
Viewing all 8088 articles
Browse latest View live

What Is the Most Poisonous Chemical Compound?

$
0
0

What Is the Most Poisonous Chemical Compound?


Question: What Is the Most Poisonous Chemical Compound?
Answer: When you get right down to it, everything is poisonous. Water will kill you if you drink too much of it. Oxygen is a deadly poison, yet we need it to live. However, there are some chemicals that we are better off not encountering. Here's a list of the most poisonous chemicals known. Keep in mind, toxicity varies from one species to another (i.e., what may be poisonous for a mouse may be more/less poisonous to a human) and within a species (i.e., age, sex, genetics all affect susceptibility to a toxin). I've listed the name of the toxin, its source, approximate average lethal dose per kilogram of body weight (LD50), and the species.
  1. tetanus
    1 nanogram/kg
    mouse, human
  2. botulinal neurotoxin (bacteria)
    1 nanogram/kg
    mouse, human
  3. shigella (bacteria)
    1 nanogram/kg
    monkey, human
  4. palytoxin (coral)
    60 nanogram/kg
    dog (iv)
  5. diphtheria (bacteria)
    100 nanogram/kg
    human
  6. ricin (from castor beans)
    1 microgram/kg
    human
  7. aflatoxins (mold which grows on nuts, legumes, seeds)
    1-784 micrograms, depending on type of aflatoxin
    duckling (oral)
  8. shigella (bacteria)
    1 microgram/kg
    mouse
  9. saxitoxin (shellfish)
    3-5 micrograms
    mouse (iv), about 50x higher dose orally
  10. tetrodotoxin (fugu pufferfish)
    10 micrograms
    mouse (ip)
  11. diphtheria (bacteria)
    1.6 milligram/kg
    mouse

20 Fast Facts About Cigarette Smoking More than 434,000 Americans die each year from smoking-related diseases.

$
0
0

A decision-making guide for teens


Most people who smoke first light up a cigarette when they're teenagers. In fact, 80% of smokers began the habit before they turned 18. Here are a few quick facts about cigarette smoking, nicotine and tobacco that you may not have heard before. Even if you have, they're facts that are worth keeping in mind when your friends and relatives light up a cigarette.
  1. Nearly 70% of people who smoke say they wish they could quit.
  2. Teens who smoke cough and wheeze three times more than teens who don't smoke.
  3. Smoking causes cancer, heart disease, lung disease and strokes.
  4. Smokers as young as 18 years old have shown evidence of developing heart disease.
  5. More than 70% of young people who smoke said they wish they hadn't started doing it.
  6. Smoking a pack of cigarettes each day costs about $1,500 per year -- enough money to buy a new computer or Xbox.
  7. Studies show that 43% of people who smoke three or fewer cigarettes a day become addicted to nicotine.
  8. More than 434,000 Americans die each year from smoking-related diseases.
  9. One-third of all new smokers will eventually die from a smoking-related disease.
  10. Nicotine -- one of the main ingredients in cigarettes -- is a poison.
  11. Nicotine is as addictive as heroin and cocaine.
  12. All tobacco products -- that includes cigarettes, cigars and chewing tobacco -- have nicotine in them.
  13. Smoking makes you feel weaker and more tired because it prevents oxygen from reaching your heart.
  14. Smoking decreases your sense of taste and smell, making you enjoy things like flowers and ice cream a little bit less.
  15. Smoking hurts the people around you: More than 53,000 people die each year from secondhand smoke.
  16. Cigarettes have tons of harmful chemicals in them, including ammonia (found in toilet cleaner), carbon monoxide (found in car exhaust) and arsenic (found in rat poison).
  17. Quitting smoking is one of the best things you can do for your health.
  18. Just days after quitting smoking, a person's sense of taste and smell returns to normal.
  19. Ten years after quiting smoking, a person's risk of lung cancer and heart disease returns to that of a non-smoker.
  20. Most teens (about 70%) don't smoke. Plus, if you make it through your teen years without becoming a smoker, chances are you'll never become a smoker.

Question: Do You Add Sulfuric Acid to Water or Water to Sulfuric Acid?

$
0
0
Question: Do You Add Sulfuric Acid to Water or Water to Sulfuric Acid?
When you mix concentrated sulfuric acid and water, you pour the acid into a larger volume of water. Mixing the chemicals the other way can present a lab safety hazard.
Answer: Whether you add acid to the water or water to the acid is one of those things I know it's important to remember, but always have to puzzle out. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) reacts very vigorously with water, in a highly exothermic reaction. If you add water to concentrated sulfuric acid, it can boil and spit and you may get a nasty acid burn. If you spill some sulfuric acid on your skin, you want to wash it off with copious amounts of running cold water as soon as possible. Water is less dense than sulfuric acid, so if you pour water on the acid, the reaction occurs on top of the liquid. If you add the acid to the water, it sinks and any wild and crazy reactions have to get through the water or beaker to get to you. How do you remember this? Here are some mnemonics:
  • AA - Add Acid
  • Acid to Water, like A&W Root Beer
  • Always do things as you oughta, add the acid to the water. (um... no... those words don't rhyme in most places.)
  • Drop acid, not water. (Don't do that either, ok?)
  • If you think your life's too placid, add the water to the acid.

Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs)

$
0
0
Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs)

The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) requires employers to comply with hazard-specific safety and health standards. In addition, pursuant to Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, employers must provide their employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Emergency Preparedness Guides do not and cannot enlarge or diminish an employer's obligations under the OSH Act.

Emergency Preparedness Guides are based on presently available information, as well as current occupational safety and health provisions and standards. The procedures and practices discussed in Emergency Preparedness Guides may need to be modified when additional, relevant information becomes available or when OSH Act standards are promulgated or modified.
Because of the potential for terrorist events, many have expressed concern about the possibility of a terrorist attack involving toxic industrial chemicals (TICs), or toxic industrial materials (TIMs). These agents can be highly toxic and are produced in large quantities. The following frequently asked questions will help workers understand what toxic industrial chemicals are and how they may affect their health and safety.
General Information
What are toxic industrial chemicals?
Toxic industrial chemicals are industrial chemicals that are manufactured, stored, transported, and used throughout the world. Toxic industrial chemicals can be in the gas, liquid, or solid state. They can be chemical hazards (e.g., carcinogens, reproductive hazards, corrosives, or agents that affect the lungs or blood) or physical hazards (e.g., flammable, combustible, explosive, or reactive). The following table lists the most common TICs listed by their hazard index.

TICs listed by hazard index
 

High
 
MediumLow
Ammonia (CAS# 7664-41-7)Acetone cyanohydrin (CAS# 75-86-5)Allyl isothiocyanate (CAS# 57-06-7)
Arsine (CAS# 7784-42-1)Acrolein (CAS# 107-02-8)Arsenic trichloride (CAS# 7784-34-1)
Boron trichloride (CAS#10294-34-5)Acrylonitrile (CAS# 107-13-l)Bromine (CAS# 7726-95-6)
Boron trifluoride (CAS#7637-07-2)Allyl alcohol (CAS# 107-18-6)Bromine chloride (CAS# 13863-41-7)
Carbon disulfide (CAS# 75-15-0)Allylamine (CAS# 107-11-9)Bromine pentafluoride (CAS# 7789-30-2)
Chlorine (CAS# 7782-50-5)Allyl chlorocarbonate (CAS# 2937-50-0)Bromine trifluoride (CAS# 7787-71-5)
Diborane (CAS# 19287-45-7)Boron tribromide (CAS# 10294-33-4)Carbonyl fluoride (CAS# 353-50-4)
Ethylene oxide (CAS# 75-21-8)Carbon monoxide (CAS# 630-08-0)Chlorine pentafluoride (CAS# 13637-63-3)
Fluorine (CAS# 7782-41-4)Carbonyl sulfide (CAS# 463-58-1)Chlorine trifluoride (CAS# 7790-91-2)
Formaldehyde (CAS# 50-00-0)Chloroacetone (CAS# 78-95-5)Chloroacetaldehyde (CAS# 107-20-0)
Hydrogen bromide (CAS# 10035-10-6)Chloroacetonitrile (CAS# 7790-94-5)Chloroacetyl chloride (CAS# 79-04-9)
Hydrogen chloride (CAS# 7647-01-0)Chlorosulfonic acid (CAS# 7790-94-5)Crotonaldehyde (CAS# 123-73-9)
Hydrogen cyanide (CAS#74-90-8)Diketene (CAS# 674-82-8)Cyanogen chloride (CAS# 506-77-4)
Hydrogen fluoride (CAS# 7664-39-3)1,2-Dimethylhydrazine (CAS# 540-73-8)Dimethyl sulfate (CAS# 77-78-1)
Hydrogen sulfide (CAS# 7783-0604)Ethylene dibromide (CAS# 106-93-4) Diphenylmethane-4.4'-diisocyanate (CAS# 101-68-8)
Nitric acid, fuming (CAS# 7697-37-2)Hydrogen selenide (CAS# 7783-07-5)Ethyl chlroroformate (CAS# 541-41-3)
Phosgene (CAS# 75-44-5)Methanesulfonyl chloride (CAS# 124-63-0)Ethyl chlorothioformate (CAS# 2941-64-2)
Phosphorus trichloride (CAS# 7719-12-2)Methyl bromide (CAS# 74-83-9)Ethyl phosphonothioic dichloride (CAS# 993-43-1)
Sulfur dioxide (CAS# 7446-09-5)Methyl chloroformate (CAS# 79-22-1)Ethyl phosphonic dichloride (CAS# 1066-50-8)
Sulfuric acid (CAS# 7664-93-9)Methyl chlorosilane (CAS# 993-00-0)Ethyleneimine (CAS# 151-56-4)
Tungsten hexafluoride (CAS# 7783-82-6)Methyl hydrazine (CAS# 60-34-4)Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (CAS# 77-47-4)
 Methyl isocyanate (CAS# 624-83-9)Hydrogen iodide (CAS# 10034-85-2)
 Methyl mercaptan (CAS# 74-93-1)Iron pentacarbonyl (CAS# 13463-40-6)
 Nitrogen dioxide (CAS# 10102-44-0)Isobutyl chloroformate (CAS# 543-27-1)
 Phosphine (CAS# 7803-51-2)Isopropyl chloroformate (CAS# 108-23-6)
 Phosphorus oxychloride (CAS# 10025-87-3)Isopropyl isocyanate (CAS# 1795-48-8)
 Phosphorus pentafluoride (CAS# 7647-19-0)n-Butyl chloroformate (CAS# 592-34-7)
 Selenium hexafluoride (CAS# 7783-79-1)n-Butyl isocyanate (CAS# 111-36-4)
 Silicon tetrafluoride (CAS# 7783-61-1)Nitric oxide (CAS# 10102-43-9)
 Stibine (CAS# 7803-52-3)n-Propyl chloroformate (CAS# 109-61-5)
 Sulfur trioxide (CAS# 7446-11-9)Parathion (CAS#: 56-38-2)
 Sulfuryl chloride (CAS# 7791-25-5)Perchloromethyl mercaptan (CAS# 594-42-3)
 Sulfuryl fluoride (CAS# 2699-79-8)sec-Butyl chloroformate (CAS# 17462-58-7)
 Tellurium hexafluoride (CAS# 7783-80-4)tert-Butyl isocyanate (CAS# 1609-86-5)
 n-Octyl mercaptan (CAS# 111-88-6)Tetraethyl lead (CAS# 78-00-2)
 Titanium tetrachloride (CAS# 7550-45-0)Tetraethyl pyroposphate (CAS# 107-49-3)
 Tricholoroacetyl chloride (CAS# 76-02-8)Tetramethyl lead (CAS# 75-74-1)
 Trifluoroacetyl chloride (CAS# 354-32-5)Toluene 2.4-diisocyanate (CAS# 584-84-9)
  Toluene 2.6-diisocyanate (CAS# 91-08-7)
Source: Guide for the Selection of Chemical and Biological Decontamination Equipment for Emergency First Responders. National Institute of Justice Guide 103-00 (Volume I), (2001, October). This guide for emergency first responders provides information about the selection and use of chemical and/or biological decontamination equipment for various applications.
Why are we concerned about toxic industrial chemicals as a terrorist’s weapon?
There are large quantities of toxic industrial chemicals manufactured, stored, transported, and used throughout the United States which, if obtained by terrorists or caused to be released, may have extremely serious effects on exposed individuals.
How long would aerosolized toxic industrial chemicals persist in the environment?
The time that these agents persist in the environment is dependent on many variables such as physical state (solid, liquid, or gas), weather conditions (wind speed, rain or snow, air or surface temperature), indoor or outdoor release, chemical stability, method of release (vapor or aerosol), or quantity released.
Health Effects
How do toxic industrial chemicals affect people?
Many toxic industrial chemicals are highly toxic and may rapidly affect exposed individuals. Toxic industrial chemicals (whether as a gas, aerosol, or liquid) enter the body through inhalation, through the skin, or through digestion. The time that it takes for a toxic industrial chemical to begin working is dependent mainly on the route that the agent enters the body. Generally poisoning occurs more quickly if a chemical enters through the lungs (because of the ability of the agent to rapidly diffuse throughout the body). Information related to how the chemicals affect humans and symptoms of exposure to specific chemicals can be found in material safety data sheets (MSDS) or chemical information cards.

Manager going to prison for hiding injuries to get safety bonus

$
0
0

Manager going to prison for hiding injuries to get safety bonus

April 19, 2013 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: construction safety, criminal charges, In this week's e-newsletter, Injuries, Latest News & Views, OSHA news

<script language=JavaScript src="http://rotator.adjuggler.com/servlet/ajrotator/896579/0/vj?z=pbp&dim=328467&pos=5&kw=&click=&abr=$scriptiniframe"></script><noscript><a href="http://rotator.adjuggler.com/servlet/ajrotator/896579/0/cc?z=pbp&pos=5"><img src="http://rotator.adjuggler.com/servlet/ajrotator/896579/0/vc?z=pbp&dim=328467&pos=5&kw=&click=&abr=$imginiframe" width="468" height="60" border="0"></a></noscript>
What will some people do to get their safety bonus? One safety manager hid more than 80 injuries to get a $2.5 million payout.
Walter Cardin, a former safety manager for the Shaw Group, has been sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for deliberately falsifying workplace injury records. He’ll also have two years’ of supervised release after he leaves prison.
The records were for work done by Shaw at three Tennessee Valley Authority nuclear plants, two in Tennessee and one in Alabama.
Cardin was convicted during a November 2012 trial of falsifying the records so Shaw could collect safety bonuses from TVA worth more than $2.5 million.
Prosecutors presented evidence of more than 80 injuries that weren’t properly recorded by Cardin, including:
  • broken bones
  • torn ligaments
  • hernias, and
  • shoulder, back and knee injuries.
Employees said they were denied medical treatment or it was delayed as a result.
Despite the evidence presented, Cardin denied intentionally misclassifying injuries. He also said he didn’t know safety bonuses were tied to his injury reports.
But investigators found emails sent by Cardin with this information.
Shaw paid back twice the amount of the safety bonuses it received from TVA.

Owner faces prison, $250K fine in death of employee April 12, 2013 by Fred Hosier

$
0
0

Owner faces prison, $250K fine in death of employee

April 12, 2013 by Fred Hosier
Here’s an update of a story we’ve been following. The owner and a manager of a printing company have pleaded guilty to criminal charges in connection with the death of a 26-year-old pregnant employee who was crushed by a machine. The owner faces time in prison.
Margarita Mojica was working at Digital Pre-Press International in San Francisco in January 2008 when she was crushed by a creasing and cutting machine that suddenly activated as she reached into it. The machine works like a giant clam shell. Rescuers had to be called to release Mojica from the machine. She was dead at the scene.
Company owner Sanjay Sakhuja has pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and five felony counts of willful violations of Cal/OSHA regulations causing death.
Pressroom manager Alick Yeung pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of violating Cal/OSHA regulations.
The company itself has also pleaded guilty to charges in the case.
Sakhuja faces up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The company faces a fine of between $50,000 and $150,000. However, if Sakhuja pays the corporate and personal fines before the Oct. 11 sentencing, his time in prison could be reduced to one year, with five years’ probation.
Yeung will be sentenced to three years’ probation.

Business owner found guilty in employee fatality February 12, 2010 by Fred Hosier

$
0
0
the owner of a tree removal company faces three to seven years in a state prison for creating workplace conditions that led to a worker fatality.
A jury found Maurice Buzzell guilty of negligent homicide and a misdemeanor reckless conduct charge in the death of 22-year-old Jon Paul LaVigueur.
Buzzell owns and operates Buzzell Tree Service.
In August 2007, LaVigueur was struck in the head and torso by parts of an 80-foot pine tree. He was part of a four-person team pulling down the tree. As it started to fall, LaVigueur apparently ran in the same direction it fell.
Former employees testified they were taught by Buzzell not to move out of the way until a tree started to fall.
Prosecutors said Buzzell required employees to stand within the fall zone of trees they were pulling down.
At first the business owner claimed he wasn’t present when the tree was pulled down. Later he admitted he tied ropes together used by the men to bring the tree down.

Top 10 loss control tips for 2013

$
0
0
What are the most important steps companies can take to mitigate risk and control loss through workplace safety? A 20-year occupational safety veteran reveals his Top 10 list.
Dennis Truitt, Vice President of Account Management at PICS Auditing, a contractor pre-qualification company, says these are the 10 best places to start a loss control program:
  1. Hazard identification and mitigation. Truitt says the first step is to identify and list potential hazards, and then following up by making the list widely recognized throughout the company. This starts at the top with executive managers who need to promote safe behavior.
  2. Job hazard analysis. After identifying risks, companies need to dig deeper. Create Job Hazard Analyses (JHAs) for specific tasks.
  3. Hand/finger safety programs. Hands are the No. 1 part of the body to be injured at work. The hand is also high on the list of body parts that result in OSHA recordable injuries. Truitt says companies need to identify pinch points, hot spots, rotating equipment, automated machinery and similar hazards to the hands. In identifying PPE, companies need to recognize its limitations. Finally, most people think they know how to protect their hands, so fighting complacency is important.
  4. Eye injury safety programs. Eye injuries are a close second to those involving hands. Many eye injuries are easily preventable. Most are due to either failure to wear or selecting the wrong type of eye protection. Companies need to identify the heat, chemicals, dust/airborne particles, radiation and impact areas where eye protection is needed.
  5. Slips, trips and falls. These incidents are often more difficult to foresee. Inspections before performing work are one way to recognize fall hazards.
  6. Hazard awareness, specific to plants/facilities. This is where hazard communication and process safety management come in. Following OSHA’s standards will provide the roadmap.
  7. Emergency action plans. Companies need to specify the roles each employee will play in an emergency. One of the most important things to plan: where everyone should meet and how to safely get to the evacuation area. Truitt says the best defense will be to have maps of your facility readily available. The maps should list all evacuation routes.
  8. Leveraging leading indicators. Lagging indicators have their place, but they don’t reveal much about what is going on now, according to Truitt. In terms of leading indicators, Truitt suggests using pre-use inspection checklists, preventive maintenance programs to prevent equipment failure and job site inspections. Safety Management Systems (SMSs) can also help.
  9. Effective communication with contract workforce. Make your safety requirements readily available to contractors and their employees.
  10. Effective contractor screening. Truit says, “The goal is to prequalify your supply chain, not to disqualify them.”

Designed Specifically for Chemical Regulatory Management and Risk Reduction

$
0
0

Designed Specifically for Chemical Regulatory Management and Risk Reduction

There is a worldwide movement to analyze and understand the dangers chemicals represent to people, the environment and our future. As a result, chemical regulations are becoming more complex and are evolving at an extremely rapid pace. To help organizations across the globe manage the burdens associated with chemicals, Safetec has developed a breakthrough solution.
The Safetec System is a unique technology and service platform designed exclusively to help global organizations manage chemicals and associated risks.

The chemicals management process is unique to every organization, but some common issues include:

  • Environmental Concerns
  • Safety Standards
  • Industrial Hygiene Analysis
  • Supply Chain Certifications
  • Product Stewardship/Compliance
  • Greening of Products
Because every organization manages chemicals differently, Safetec’s platform is extremely configurable and flexible. The Safetec System is comprised of an extensive framework of technology building blocks integrated with a core set of services. Safetec acquires the chemical information from your facilities, products and/or supply chain through a variety of on-site or outsourced services and through integrations with other critical information sources such as ERP systems. This foundation allows for seamless entry points to populate critical chemical and related data throughout the system.
The Safetec System’s combination technology, information and service platform allows us to rapidly build a comprehensive solution to meet even the most stringent requirements, all without the time, costs and risks of custom programming.
Why is this important? Custom programming is extremely time consuming, expensive and dramatically increases failure rates of deployed systems. With a configurable tool such as The Safetec System, applications are time-tested and proven reliable, implementation is faster, and overall deployment costs are greatly reduced.
With Safetec as your partner, you are ensured the right product and service combination to meet your greatest regulatory challenges. This approach eliminates unnecessary costs, is scalable and improves overall adoption rates throughout an organization.

5 million U.S. workplaces face new hazcom training deadline in 2013

$
0
0
While the transition to OSHA’s new Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) happens in 2015, businesses face a deadline this year that involves employee training.
By Dec. 1, 2013, more than five million U.S. businesses must train about 43 million employees on the new label elements and safety data sheet (SDS) format included in the HCS update.
Why does the hazcom training have to be completed this year if compliance doesn’t kick in until 2015? Because workplaces will soon start to receive products with the new types of labels and SDSs. Therefore, employees need to know how to use the new documents.
What will employees need to know?
  • Labels: Chemical labels will include a signal word, pictogram and hazard statement for each hazard class and category. Precautionary statements may also be included.
  • Safety Data Sheets: These will now have a 16-section format.
There are nine pictograms required in the revised HCS — eight are mandatory:
  • health hazard (carcinogen, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, respiratory sensitizer, target organ toxicity, aspiration toxicity)
  • flame (flammables, pyrophorics, self-heating, emits flammable gas, self-reactives, organic peroxides)
  • exclamation mark (skin and eye irritant, skin sensitizer, acute toxicity, narcotic effects, respiratory tract irritant, hazardous to ozone layer)
  • gas cylinder (gases under pressure)
  • corrosion (skin corrosion/burns, eye damage, corrosive to metals)
  • exploding bomb (explosives, self-reactives, organic peroxides)
  • flame over circle (oxidizers)
  • skull and crossbones (acute toxicity — possibly fatal), and
  • environment (aquatic toxicity — non-mandatory).

The past & present of Indian environmentalism

$
0
0

The past & present of Indian environmentalism



Polluted skies, dead rivers, disappearing forests and displacement of peasants and tribals are what we see around us 40 years after the Chipko movement started

On the 27th of March 1973 — exactly 40 years ago — a group of peasants in a remote Himalayan village stopped a group of loggers from felling a patch of trees. Thus was born the Chipko movement, and through it the modern Indian environmental movement itself.
The first thing to remember about Chipko is that it was not unique. It was representative of a wide spectrum of natural resource conflicts in the 1970s and 1980s — conflicts over forests, fish, and pasture; conflicts about the siting of large dams; conflicts about the social and environmental impacts of unregulated mining. In all these cases, the pressures of urban and industrial development had deprived local communities of access to the resources necessary to their own livelihood. Peasants saw their forests being diverted by the state for commercial exploitation; pastorialists saw their grazing grounds taken over by factories and engineering colleges; artisanal fisherfolk saw themselves being squeezed out by large trawlers.
Social justice and sustainability
In the West, the environmental movement had arisen chiefly out of a desire to protect endangered animal species and natural habitats. In India, however, it arose out of the imperative of human survival. This was an environmentalism of the poor, which married the concern of social justice on the one hand with sustainability on the other. It argued that present patterns of resource use disadvantaged local communities and devastated the natural environment.
Back in the 1970s, when the state occupied the commanding heights of the economy, and India was close to the Soviet Union, the activists of Chipko and other such movements were dismissed by their critics as agents of Western imperialism. They had, it was alleged, been funded and promoted by foreigners who hoped to keep India backward. Slowly, however, the sheer persistence of these protests forced the state into making some concessions. When Indira Gandhi returned to power, in 1980, a Department of Environment was established at the Centre, becoming a full-fledged Ministry a few years later. New laws to control pollution and to protect natural forests were enacted. There was even talk of restoring community systems of water and forest management.
Meanwhile, journalists and scholars had begun more systematically studying the impact of environmental degradation on social life across India. The pioneering reportage of Anil Agarwal, Darryl D’ Monte, Kalpana Sharma, Usha Rai, Nagesh Hegde and others played a critical role in making the citizenry more aware of these problems. Scientists such as Madhav Gadgil and A.K.N. Reddy began working out sustainable patterns of forest and energy use.
Through these varied efforts, the environmentalism of the poor began to enter school and college pedagogy. Textbooks now mentioned the Chipko and Narmada movements. University departments ran courses on environmental sociology and environmental history. Specialist journals devoted to these subjects were now printed and read. Elements of an environmental consciousness had, finally, begun to permeate the middle class.
Changing perception
In 1991 the Indian economy started to liberalise. The dismantling of state controls was in part welcome, for the licence-permit-quota-Raj had stifled innovation and entrepreneurship. Unfortunately, the votaries of liberalisation mounted an even more savage attack on environmentalists than did the proponents of state socialism. Under their influence the media, once so sensitive to environmental matters, now began to demonise people like Medha Patkar, leader of the Narmada movement. Influential columnists charged that she, and her comrades, were relics from a bygone era, old-fashioned leftists who wished to keep India backward. In a single generation, environmentalists had gone from being seen as capitalist cronies to being damned as socialist stooges.
Environmentalists were attacked because, with the dismantling of state controls, only they asked the hard questions. When a new factory, highway, or mining project was proposed, only they asked where the water or land would come from, or what the consequences would be for the quality of the air, the state of the forests, and the livelihood of the people. Was development under liberalisation only going to further intensify the disparities between city and countryside? Before approving the rash of mining leases in central India, or the large hydel projects being built in the high (and seismically fragile) Himalayas, had anyone systematically assessed their social and environmental costs and benefits? Was a system in which the Environmental Impact Assessment was written by the promoter himself something a democracy should tolerate? These, and other questions like them, were brushed off even as they were being asked.
Steady deterioration
Meanwhile, the environment continued to deteriorate. The levels of air pollution were now shockingly high in all Indian cities. The rivers along which these cities were sited were effectively dead. Groundwater aquifers dipped alarmingly in India’s food bowl, the Punjab. Districts in Karnataka were devastated by open-cast mining. Across India, the untreated waste of cities was dumped on villages. Forests continued to decline, and sometimes disappear. Even the fate of our national animal, the tiger, now hung in the balance.
A major contributory factor to this continuing process of degradation has been the apathy and corruption of our political class. A birdwatcher herself, friendly with progressive conservationists such as Salim Ali, Indira Gandhi may have been the Prime Minister most sensitive (or at least least insensitive) to matters of environmental sustainability. On the other hand, of all Prime Ministers past and present Dr. Manmohan Singh has been the most actively hostile. This is partly a question of academic background; economists are trained to think that markets can conquer all forms of scarcity. It is partly a matter of ideological belief; both as Finance Minister, and now as Prime Minister, Dr. Singh has argued that economic growth must always take precedence over questions of environmental sustainability.
An environmentally literate Prime Minister would certainly help. That said, it is State-level politicians who are most deeply involved in promoting mining and infrastructure projects that eschew environmental safeguards even as they disregard the communities they displace. In my own State, Karnataka, mining barons are directly part of the political establishment. In other States they act through leaders of the Congress, the BJP, and regional parties.
In 1928, 45 years before the birth of the Chipko movement, Mahatma Gandhi had said: “God forbid that India should ever take to industrialisation after the manner of the West. The economic imperialism of a single tiny island kingdom (England) is today keeping the world in chains. If an entire nation of 300 million took to similar economic exploitation, it would strip the world bare like locusts.”
The key phrase in this quotation is ‘after the manner of the West.’ Gandhi knew that the Indian masses had to be lifted out of poverty; that they needed decent education, dignified employment, safe and secure housing, freedom from want and from disease. Likewise, the best Indian environmentalists — such as the founder of the Chipko movement, Chandi Prasad Bhatt — have been hard-headed realists. What they ask for is not a return to the past, but for the nurturing of a society, and economy, that meets the demands of the present without imperilling the needs of the future.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the finest minds in the environmental movement sought to marry science with sustainability. They sought to design, and implement, forest, energy, water and transport policies that would augment economic productivity and human welfare without causing environmental stress. They acted in the knowledge that, unlike the West, India did not have colonies whose resources it could draw upon in its own industrial revolution.
In the mid-1980s, as I was beginning my academic career, the Government of Karnataka began producing an excellent annual state of the environment report, curated by a top-ranking biologist, Cecil Saldanha, and with contributions from leading economists, ecologists, energy scientists, and urban planners. These scientific articles sought to direct the government’s policies towards more sustainable channels. Such an effort is inconceivable now, and not just in Karnataka. For the prime victim of economic liberalisation has been environmental sustainability.
Corporate interests
A wise, and caring, government would have deepened the precocious, far-seeing efforts of our environmental scientists. Instead, rational, fact-based scientific research is now treated with contempt by the political class. The Union Environment Ministry set up by Indira Gandhi has, as the Economic and Political Weekly recently remarked, ‘buckled completely’ to corporate and industrial interests. The situation in the States is even worse.
India today is an environmental basket-case; marked by polluted skies, dead rivers, falling water-tables, ever-increasing amounts of untreated wastes, disappearing forests. Meanwhile, tribal and peasant communities continue to be pushed off their lands through destructive and carelessly conceived projects. A new Chipko movement is waiting to be born.
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/the-past-present-of-indian-environmentalism/article4551665.ece

Workplace Conditions That Can Lead to Forklift Accidents

$
0
0

Surface or ground conditions are an important part of safe powered industrial truck operation. In today's Advisor we focus on hazardous conditions in your workplace that can lead to forklift accidents.
Physical conditions in the workplace that can lead to forklift accidents include slippery conditions, obstructions and uneven surfaces, flooring and load limits, overhead clearances, and ramps and grades.

Slippery Conditions

Hazards
  • Danger of skidding when traveling on oil, grease, water or other spills 
  • Danger of tipover when traveling on ice, snow, mud, gravel and uneven areas
Safe Practices
  • Avoid the hazardous surface when feasible.
  • Spread absorbent material on slick areas that you cannot avoid.
  • Cross the slippery area slowly and cautiously. 
  • Report the area to prevent others from slipping.
  • Post a sign or warning cones until the area can be cleaned.
  • Drive slowly!
  • Maintain contact with the ground by crossing uneven areas at an angle.
  • Clean up the oil or grease spill before proceeding (driving over an oil or grease spot will enlarge the hazardous area).

Obstructions and Uneven Surfaces

Hazards
  • Danger of tipover when traveling over obstructions
  • Danger of tipover in holes and bumps
Safe Practices
  • Keep all aisles clear.
  • Watch out for overhead obstructions.
  • Avoid the obstruction or get off the forklift and remove the obstruction. 
  • Never drive straight across speed bumps or railroad tracks. Cross slowly at a 45-degree angle.
  • Maintain steering control by keeping contact with the ground at all times.
  • If an area is cluttered, walk the route first to spot problems.

Flooring and Load Limits

Hazard
  • Danger of collapsing floor
Safe Practices
  • Observe posted floor loading limits.
  • Inspect the condition of the floor. Look for holes or weakened flooring, loose objects or obstructions, protruding nails or boards.
  • Inform a supervisor immediately if flooring is defective.
  • Do not travel over a surface that cannot support the weight of the lift truck, its load, and its operator.
  • Do not enter a boxcar or semi-van without inspecting its floor and knowing its load limits.

Overhead Clearances

Hazards
  • Danger of tipover
  • Damage to lights, stacks, doors, sprinklers, pipes
  • Damage to load
Safe Practices
  • Be aware of the height of fixtures.
  • Don't travel with loads elevated.

Ramps and Grades

Hazards
  • Danger of tipover
  • Damage to load
Safe Practices
  • Always look in the direction of travel.
  • Never turn on a ramp or incline. Turn prior to the ramp or incline to place forks in proper direction.
  • Keep a safe distance from the edge of a ramp. 
  • Do not travel on ramps with slopes or other conditions that exceed the manufacturer's recommendation.
  • When traveling with a load, make sure the load points up the incline, regardless of the direction of travel.
  • When traveling without a load, make sure the load points down the grade, regardless of the direction of travel.

Tough Love: What Your Employees Won’t Say About HR, But I Will

$
0
0

Tough Love: What Your Employees Won’t Say About HR, But I Will


Topic: HR Management
Special from SHRM’s Legal and Legislative Conference
Tough Love: What Your Employees Won’t Say About HR, But I Will
SHRM’s top-rated speaker, attorney Jonathan Segal, has distilled what he’s learned about HR—by listening to non-HR people—into 15 principles all HR managers should abide by.Segal, who is a partner with law firm Duane Morris LLP in Philadelphia, shared what he’s found in engagement surveys, discussions with CEOs and COOs, and his own observations in a well-attended session at the SHRM Employment Law and Legislative Conference, held recently in Washington, D.C.
Here are Segal’s 15 principles:

1. Communicate More Frequently and Effectively

  • All your communications need to be clear, concise, and credible. (For example, saying “I had no idea this was coming” when you did know is not credible.)
  • Communicate about HR, of course, but don’t stop there. Be more of a business partner; talk about new products and services, for example.
  • Diversify the means and frequency of your communications; for example, don’t always communicate by e-mail.

2. Plain Speak English: Minimize HR-ese

It can sound like we’re hiding behind our lingo, says Segal. Phrases to avoid include:
  • Proactive
  • Value added
  • Synergistic
  • Paradigm shift
  • Outside the box
  • Opine
  • New normal

3. Be Visible and Approachable

Yes, you want to keep an open door, but that’s not enough. You want to:
  • Walk the floors.
  • Visit locations, and not just when there’s a problem.
  • Ask employees:
    • What’s working?
    • What’s not working?
Again, do not limit your inquiries to HR issues only.

4. Help Employees Solve Problems

Again, the HR issues are a given, but be knowledgeable about and help employees solve other business problems, such as:
  • Finance and accounting
  • Sales and marketing
  • Products and services
  • Business operations and logistics
  • Technology
If you cannot solve the problem, find the right person who can.

5. Increase Recognition and Appreciation (“R&A”)

Lack of recognition and appreciation is the number one complaint of employees, says Segal. You have to make the case for R&A.
  • Improve the quality of your product or service—unengaged employees will not work to full capacity.
  • Minimize loss of talent—unengaged employees will leave.

6. Recalibrate Time

It’s typical to spend 85% of your time on your “favorite” 15% of employees. You can’t totally reverse this, but you can move along the continuum, says Segal.
  • Resolve to spend more time with A and B players (and less time with C players).
  • Reserve “outlook time,” time spent on positive employee relations.

7. Say No to GOMOs

You need to learn how to say nicely: “Get out of my office.” HR cannot be the “friend to the friendless.” You need to be direct that not every issue is an HR issue. Be kind but protect your time, says Segal.

8. Protect Employees from Retaliation

Sentence you’ve never heard: “I’ve always wanted to be falsely accused of something that is an anathema to my values.” Segal’s point is that the urge to retaliate is natural, but has to be avoided.
  • Empower employees to speak up internally (or they will do so externally).
  • Understand that employees fear retaliation (because it happens).
  • Meet with managers to make sure there is no “terms and conditions” retaliation (giving the worst assignments, no raise, for example).
  • Be aware of the possibility of retaliation by avoidance. (OK, since I get in trouble talking to this employee, I just won’t communicate with him at all.”) That’s also a form of retaliation.

9. Protect Employees from Bullying

Bullying because of or directed at a protected group can be illegal; otherwise, bullying is not unlawful if it is directed toward an individual target due to personal animus, or at many targets (the equal opportunity bully). But that doesn’t mean that you can allow and condone bullying.
  • Clarify for managers the difference between pushing an employee hard to do better work and bullying.
  • Understand that bullying has costs in lowered morale and productivity.
  • Advocate for employees, where appropriate.

10. Be Clear of Your Role

You often have to play a mediator’s role, says Segal, but remember that you are a member of management.
  • Don’t suggest you are an employee advocate.
  • But serve as an employee advocate, where appropriate.

Globalization and the Developing Countries: The Inequality Risk

$
0
0
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Globalization and the Developing Countries:
The Inequality Risk
Remarks at Overseas Development Council Conference, Making Globalization Work,
International Trade Center, Washington, D.C., March 18, 1999
Nancy Birdsall
nbirdsall@ceip.org
My task is to talk about globalization and inequality in developing countries, with emphasis on Latin America. I have a simple point to make: globalization puts developing countries at risk of increasing income inequality. The increase in inequality in the United States over the last 25 years (during which the income of the poorest 20 percent of households has fallen in real terms by about 15 percent) has been blamed, rightly or wrongly, on changes in trade, technology and migration patterns associated with increasing economic integration with other countries. For developing countries, any risk of increasing inequality associated with active participation in the global economy is even greater, if only because of the greater inherent institutional weaknesses associated with being poor. Latin America has a special disadvantage: its historical legacy of already high inequality. Inequality that is already high complicates the task of effective conflict management, which Dani Rodrik has just reminded us is a critical input to managing open economies. In the past, for example, high inequality combined with the politics of redistribution led to periodic bouts of populism in Latin America – ineffective and counterproductive efforts to manage the conflicts provoked by the dangerous combination of high inequality and hard times.
Let me start with two prefatory remarks. First, globalization – that is the trend of increasing integration of economies in terms not only of goods and services, but of ideas, information and technology – has tremendous potential benefits for developing countries. Nothing I say should suggest otherwise. The challenge is to realize the potential benefits without undertaking huge offsetting costs. Second, not all inequality is a bad thing Some inequality represents the healthy outcome of differences across individuals in ambition, motivation and willingness to work. This constructive inequality provides incentives for mobility and rewards high productivity. Some would say constructive inequality is the hallmark of the equal opportunity society the U.S. symbolizes. Increases in this constructive inequality may simply reflect faster growth in income for the rich than the poor – but with all sharing in some growth. But of course it can also be true that inequality is destructive, when for example it reflects deep and persistent differences across individuals or groups in access to the assets that generate income – including not only land (which is extremely unequally distributed in Latin America) but, most important in today’s global information age, the asset of education. Obviously this destructive inequality undermines economic growth and efficiency, by reducing the incentives for individuals to work, to save, to innovate and to invest. And it often results in the perception if not the reality of injustice and unfairness – with the political risk in the short term of a backlash against the market reforms and market institutions that in the long term are the critical ingredients of shared and sustainable growth.
I have three parts to my remarks: first, on inequality and market reforms; second, on inequality and the recent financial crisis; third, on what to do, or more grandly on policy implications.
On Inequality and Market Reform
Consider some examples of how the market reforms associated with globalization can affect inequality in developing countries.
First, trade liberalization. On the one hand, trade liberalization makes economies more competitive and thus is likely to reduce disequalizing rents to insiders. The end of import substitution programs and associated rationing of access to foreign exchange has probably been the greatest single factor in reducing the corrosive effects of corruption and rent-seeking in Latin America. Trade liberalization can also generate new labor-intensive jobs in agriculture and manufacturing – raising the incomes for example of the rural poor. And trade liberalization implies cheaper imports, reducing the real costs of consumption for the urban poor – who after all unlike the rich use most of their income for consumption.
On the other hand, recent evidence shows that trade liberalization leads to growing wage gaps between the educated and uneducated, not only in the OECD countries but in the developing countries. Between 1991 and 1995 wage gaps increased for six of seven countries of Latin America for which we have good wage data. The exception is Costa Rica, where education levels are relatively high. Apparently the combination of technology change with the globalization of markets is raising the demand for and the wage premium to skilled labor faster than the educational system is supplying skilled and trainable workers. In Latin America education levels have been increasing, but painfully slowly – with for example only 1.5 years of additional education added to the average education of the labor force in three decades (in contrast to twice that increase in Southeast Asia). And the distribution of education, though improving slowly, is still highly unequal, meaning that many of today’s workers have even less than the current average of about 4.8 years of completed schooling.
In short, the effect of trade liberalization on inequality depends – including on the extent to which a country’s comparative advantage lies in job-using agriculture or manufactured exports, and on the extent to which education has been increasing and is already broadly shared. In Costa Rica, with good education and a high proportion of the relatively poor engaged in smallholder coffee production, trade liberalization has had equalizing effects. But in Mexico, where the rural poor are concentrated in food production and education levels are still low and unequally shared, income declined between 1986 and 1996 for every decile of the income distribution except the richest, where it increased by 15 percent. Unfortunately Mexico is probably more typical than Costa Rica. For the region as a whole, though trade liberalization is likely to increase average incomes, it is also likely to increase inequality, at least in the near future, because education efforts have lagged and because the region’s comparative advantage (other than in Costa Rica and Uruguay) is in capital-intensive rather than job-creating natural resource-based production.
A second example is privatization. Privatization of utilities (power, water, telecommunications) has been good news for the lower deciles of the income distribution all over the developing world. Why? Because it has dramatically increased access to services. Prior to privatization, publicly managed utilities were chronically insolvent financially and thus their services were highly rationed. The rich had access to water to fill their swimming pools (and often at artificially low prices meant to protect to the poor!) while the poor paid 20 times the unit cost to purchase water from private trucks.
On the other hand, it is increasingly obvious that privatization poses grave risks of concentrating wealth unless done well and with the full complement of regulation. In small economies with limited competition and high concentrations of political and economic power, even privatization of firms that in larger settings with more arms-length and transparent market rules would face the discipline of competition, can end up locking in rather than eliminating private privileges. In a recent poll in Latin America, respondents agreed by three to one to the general statement that “a market is best”. But in Argentina, Peru, Colombia, Uruguay and Panama, fewer than half supported the idea that privatization had been beneficial – apparently because of the widespread perception that the high costs of newly privatized services reflect lack of real competition. Russia is of course the most extreme example of the danger that corruption will infect the privatization process. Those of you familiar with the saga of the privatization of banks in Mexico in the early 1990s, and the subsequent political fallout in 1998 (when a sound proposal from the technical point of view was nearly derailed by the political effects of the 1995 rescue of many insider bank owners and borrowers) will recognize the political risks associated with a privatization process that ends up reinforcing rather than diffusing initial inequality of wealth and privileges.
The risks of privatization arise because developing and transitional economies, almost by definition, are handicapped by relatively weak institutions, less well-established rules of transparency, and often, not only high concentrations of economic and political power but a high correlation between those two areas of power. These conditions combine to make it difficult indeed to manage the privatization process in a manner that is not disequalizing.
Third: financial liberalization. On the one hand, there is little doubt that low- and middle-income consumers and small and medium businesses were the biggest losers in the 1980s with the repressed banking systems of Latin America. Controls on interest rates reduced their access to any credit at all, and government-run credit allocation favored small enterprises only on paper. Similar arrangements almost surely penalized the middle class and the poor in Africa. In the medium term, elimination of financial repression and the increased competition of a modern and liberalized financial sector will increase access to credit for small enterprises and raise the return to the banking deposits which are the principal vehicle for small savers. The advantages for small business in turn is likely to generate more good jobs and raise wages for the working poor.
However in the short run at least, financial liberalization tends to help those most who already have assets, increasing the concentration of wealth which undergirds in the medium term a high concentration of income. For one thing, liberalization increases the potential returns to new and more risky instruments for those who can afford a diversified portfolio and therefore more risk, and who have access to information and the relatively lower transacting costs that education and well-informed colleagues provide. In Latin America, with repeated bouts of inflation and currency devaluations in the last several decades, the ability of those with more financial assets to move them abroad (often while accumulating corporate and bank debt that has been socialized and thus eventually repaid by taxpayers) has been particularly disequalizing. In Mexico between 1986 and 1996 small savers who kept their assets in bank savings accounts lost about 50 percent, while those able to invest in equity instruments realized modest gains. Those who moved their assets into dollars or dollar-indexed instruments before the 1994-95 devaluation did best of all in terms of local purchasing power.
On Inequality and the Financial Crisis
The recent financial crisis has highlighted how volatility associated with global capital markets can compound the problem of destructive inequality in developing countries. For example, high inflows of capital generate inflationary pressure and hurt labor-intensive agriculture and manufactured exports, especially but not only under fixed exchange rate regimes. In Asia and Latin America, Gini coefficients of inequality increased during the boom years of high capital inflows in the mid-1990s, as portfolio inflows and high bank lending fueled demand for short-term inelastic assets such as land and stocks, favoring the rich. In both regions the poor gained less during the boom, and then lost more with the bust. During the bust, with capital fleeing, the high interest rates countries are forced to impose to protect their currencies (again, whether the exchange rate is fixed or floating), hurt small capital-starved enterprises and their low-wage employees most, and of course reduce employment in general. In Latin America, a high-interest environment also tends to benefit net savers and hurt small debtors, with a regressive impact; this has certainly been the effect in Mexico and Brazil. Helmut Reisen has recently pointed out the additional regressive impact of the fiscal cost of bank bailouts in developing countries, simply because the redistributive impact of public debt tends to be negative. He recalls Keynes’ Tract on Monetary Reform, where Keynes reminds us that public debt implies a transfer from taxpayers to rentiers. Worst of all in Latin America’s historically inflation-plagued economies (though this is notably much less the case the today), the poor hold cash, the non-interest bearing part of the debt which has been subject to considerable inflation tax.
The problem emerging markets face is a broader one. Because global market players doubt their commitment to fiscal rectitude at the time of any shock, they are forced into tight fiscal and monetary policy, to re-establish market confidence, at precisely the moment when in the face of recession they would ideally implement counter-cyclical fiscal and monetary measures in order to stimulate their economies. The austerity policies that the global capital market demands of emerging markets are precisely the opposite of what the OECD economies can afford to implement – such relatively automatic Keynesian stabilizers as unemployment insurance, increased availability of food stamps, and public works employment programs, the ingredients of a modern and effective social safety net. Furthermore we know now that the effects of unemployment and bankruptcy on the poorer half of the population can be permanent; in Mexico increases in child labor force participation and reduced enrollment in school during the 1995 downturn have not been reversed. Similarly a collapse in employment opportunities for labor force entrants can have lifetime effects on job possibility and income-earning potential for the affected cohorts.
On What to Do: Are There Policy Implications?
There are implications for domestic policy, and for international economic policy as well.
On the domestic policy side, one obvious implication of the vulnerability of emerging market economies to volatility in global capital availability is to reduce reliance on foreign capital. Dani Rodrik emphasizes the centrality of a locally financed investment push to the success of small open developing economies, implying the need to increase private and/or public savings. The recent crisis highlights, for a different reason, the importance of public savings. If public spending in developing countries is to play a socially and economically efficient countercyclical role during a downturn, public savings in the form of a prior and precautionary fiscal surplus has to have already created the necessary fiscal space to finance safety net programs. Today Brazil has virtually no such fiscal flexibility, and is paying a price in increasing inequality. Chile does have space, and any increase in inequality will be lower. Of course, maintaining and insulating politically a fiscal surplus is no easy task – as the current politics-of- the-surplus debate in the U.S. shows.
In addition, the developing countries face the same problem as the OECD countries: raising revenue to finance a social safety net requires taxing the public. In a global economy, there is some evidence that it is increasingly difficult to tax footloose capital (and even to tax the income of highly educated and internationally mobile labor). David Hale noted this morning that Singapore and South Africa have recently reduced corporate taxes. So countries ironically need to tax most in good times those who are most vulnerable in bad times – and to the extent these are the innocent bystanders to the excesses of the boom and bust cycles, the impression if not the reality of unfair burden sharing is heightened.
Assured revenue for an effective safety net minimizes the welfare and human capital losses the poor otherwise suffer with economic or other shocks. But in the medium run, the best vaccine against inequality is widespread access to good education. In today’s global information age, education is the people’s asset; the more there is of it, the lower the inequality of real total wealth in the long run. It is still unfortunately the case that in many countries of Latin America, education is a vehicle for reinforcing rather than compensating for initial differences across households in income and wealth. I have written and spoken elsewhere about the need for aggressively targeted public programs to bring good education to the poor. Unfortunately in a vicious circle, education for the poor is a political and technical task made all the more difficult where high current income inequality, as in Latin America, constrains effective demand of poor households and generates resistance of rich households to use of the public fisc to finance effective basic schooling.
A third key ingredient of domestic policy to counter inequality is what might be called an aggressive EOF bias, i.e. constant and vigorous Equal-Opportunity Fine-tuning of economic policies. For example, if macroeconomic equilibrium requires high interest rates, temporary measures to ensure equal access to credit for small and micro enterprises may be warranted. If a major restructuring of the financial sector is required, distributional considerations demand that bank shareholders assume their share of losses; not all the costs should be passed to depositors and taxpayers. Privatization schemes can make special provisions under which small investors can buy small lots of shares, and can borrow at reasonable rates to purchase available shares – as has been tried in Peru; or can be arranged to generate widely distributed benefits for all citizens in the form of future pension assets, as in Bolivia.
What about international economic programs and policies? First, the international financial institutions could pay much more attention to the political reality of inequality of assets and income in developing countries. Conditionality associated with international lending and grants could be much more explicitly focussed on slashing subsidies that benefit the rich, on encouraging and financing market-consistent land reform, and most important, on ensuring that there is effective public education, on which the poor so heavily depend if they are to join in the benefits of a market economy.
Second, the OECD countries could revisit their trade stance as it affects the poor in developing countries. Protection of agriculture and of textiles discriminates against the poor within countries. The head of the World Trade Organization has proposed elimination of tariffs on all imports of the world’s 50 poorest countries. This would reduce income inequality not only across but within poor countries.
Third, the poor and vulnerable in developing countries might well benefit from some international financing of countercyclical safety net programs in emerging market economies that are hit by global liquidity crises. Max Corden has set out the conditions that would make such financing appropriate, which include a solid record of sound fiscal policy in recipient countries; the political capacity to mount such programs without corruption and to unwind them when the crisis recedes; and the long-run fiscal capacity to service any resultant external debt. These are stringent conditions, but the fact is that Mexico in 1995 and Korea in 1998 could have qualified, and could thus have reduced the tremendous and terrible costs to human welfare and the permanent losses of human capital associated with the impact of financial crises on those Joe Stiglitz has called the innocent bystanders. International financing is now used during liquidity crises to build reserves (and thus market confidence) and to finance imports. Why do we know so little about the potential costs (e.g., effects on inflation) and benefits of external financing earmarked for temporary increases in spending on social insurance and safety net programs?
*          *           *           *           *           *           *
In conclusion, the developing countries face special risks that globalization and the market reforms that reflect and reinforce their integration into the global economy, will exacerbate inequality, at least in the short run, and raise the political costs of inequality and the social tensions associated with it. The risks are likely to be greatest in the next decade or so, as they undergo the difficult transition to more competitive, transparent and rule-based economic systems with more widespread access to the assets, especially education, which ensure equal access to market opportunities. During that transition, more emphasis on minimizing and managing inequality, on making the market game as nearly as possible a fair one, even in the short run, would minimize the real risks of a protectionist and populist backlash. A backlash would be a shame, as in a perverse twist, it would undermine the benefits that more open and more globally integrated economies and polities can deliver to all the people of the developing world.

On Earth Day, forget not World Malaria Day

$
0
0
On Earth Day, forget not World Malaria Day

On Earth Day, forget not World Malaria Day

by james on April 22, 2013

Introduction

Smoke began to spread through the flashing room. Few had noticed the steady uprising of the ghostly haze before its tendrils reached the noses of most of the gyrating crowd. Strobe lights in the club ripped like lightning through the pale cloud, adding to the heat and thrill and pounding beat. Dry ice was often added for effect. But when a pungent odor reached the nose, then eye, of the first raver, it was plain to him that something was different from usual. Something was wrong.
It hurt. It burnt. A woman screamed. Like a machine gun flashing in his mind, thought racing faster than sound, a mute image sprang at his throat, gagging him. Terrorist! Poison gas!
Fear brought him low. By then the screams had intensified as others found their voice. As he tried to rise a knee slammed into his chest and knocked him down. He gagged again and gasped. Someone vomited on him.
He rose. He ran like a wild creature, splashed outward, tumbled heavily down the precipitous steps onto those who beat him to the door. Before he could rise someone landed on top of him.
Eyes rolling wide with fear, the mad flood poured down the narrow stairwell. In a moment the tide became a rising, writhing wave, throttling life at the bottom. Athleticism terminated survival of the fittest.
An investigation found that the hysterical stampede at the Chicago nightclub[i] began when security used pepper spray to break up a fight between two women. There was no need to panic. Who knew?

Crowd Dynamics

Recently in Goya, Argentina, Francisco Lotero and Miriam Coletti ate a meal with their two young children. Then Lotero and Coletti killed themselves. Fear, like guilt, is a terrible thing. It can drive people frantic.
For some the fear in the smoky club is matched by the anxiety and stress they feel over any number of crises. It is easy to panic. But how does one decide whether a crisis is real and deserving of urgent attention? When is a stampede reasonable? When is it suicide?
Lotero and his wife first shot their children. Their suicide pact, explained in a note left on the kitchen table, was prompted over fears about global warming. One can only imagine the fevered discussions around their kitchen table, their painful conclusion that the only way to reduce their carbon footprint was to destroy their family.

The Biggest Crisis

We are all familiar with the litany of our ever deteriorating environment. Images of drowning polar bears, melting icebergs, groaning trees, dirty air, and overall environmental mayhem clog our emotional arteries.
Doubtless we have problems to deal with today. The planet has a fever. Fevers can lead to death. Such arguments make sense when the music screeches to a halt as the club burns down. All arguments to the contrary will not keep people from doing whatever it takes to save their lives from hellfire. Unfortunately, moving people in the wrong direction can lead to needless pain and suffering and death. Ask the Lotero’s.
Would they reconsider self-murder if the planet had actually not warmed over the last sixteen years? It has not warmed. If only they knew that the hypothesis of human caused global warming is now so scientifically untenable that it must be rebranded as ‘climate change’.

The real killers

Are there real environmental problems? Without a doubt! Are the polar bears in danger? No they are not. Polar bear populations are larger than ever before in human history.[ii] Polar bears are in more danger of being hit by an asteroid than by being killed due to global warming.
A neurotic might now begin to have nightmares about asteroid strikes. After all, potential human deaths from an asteroid strike are staggering. But one ought to question the stability of those who fret over vanishingly remote possibilities.
North Americans quietly suffer the hardship of increased grocery prices as the corn cost spirals up due to government edicts. What we find a painful inconvenience is certain death for others in countries who might otherwise buy and eat the 40 percent of the American corn crop diverted to biofuel.[iii] Ethanol in our gas tanks not only destroys engines. It is an appalling assault on the millions of people who are desperately clinging to the edge.
In the modern environmentalist analysis, such facts go by the wayside.

Malaria: A real environmental crisis

Malaria is a case in point.
Arguably the greatest environmental tragedy of the last forty years is the needless death of over fifty million people due to malaria. This is more people than Hitler killed, twice as many as Stalin killed, and approaching as many as Mao killed. And it is the direct result of eco-hysteria.
For environmental activists, the facts about malaria are an inconvenient truth that conflicts with their ideology. The global warming myth makers, alarmists and creators of hysteria, argue that malaria is a tropical disease greatly expanding due to global warming. The reality is that even during the Little Ice Age, hundreds of years ago, when the River Thames froze over, malaria was rampant in Essex marshes.[iv]
Ague, as it was known, is common throughout human history. At least three million people a year died of malaria just a century ago. In the early 1920s an epidemic swept the Soviet Union as far north as the Arctic Circle, killing about six hundred thousand people.
The New England puritan Jonathan Edwards suffered severely from malarial fevers. When New England was first settled yellow fever and malaria were common diseases, persisting well into the twentieth century.[v]
Pioneers to Wisconsin were no strangers to malaria[vi] and in 1878 the New York Times reported malarial outbreaks in Brooklyn and Coney Island.[vii] Malaria epidemics were once common in Canada;[viii] infection rates up to 60% and death rates of 4% were reported among laborers in Ontario.
Surely no one would blame these outbreaks on global warming. Neither are these places tropical paradise then or now.
It is arguable that in the history of the world there has been no greater killer plague than malaria. The numbers are staggering. Today over three billion people somehow find the strength to cope with its debilitating effects. Those people are largely in the impoverished South.
You see, malaria was eliminated in the West and North because of the invention of the miracle pesticide DDT. Soon after the first Earth Day, as eco-hysteria drove public policy, DDT was banned in the United States.
DDT is not without its detriments. But, in the absence of effective and affordable alternatives, when one weighs the costs of the use of DDT versus the benefits of the elimination of disease ridden pests, it is a small price to pay.
Anyone who has lost a child or parent understands this. In Africa a child dies because of malaria every thirty seconds, and someone is infected every twelve seconds. This is a clear and present legacy of eco-hysteria.
Christians may be attracted to the environmental movement because they understand they must be good stewards of God’s creation. But they are mistaken to think the work of the environmental movement is the work of the Lord. It is not enough to have good intentions. In this regard, environmentalists are beginning to drown in credibility problems.
In 1970 Joni Mitchell sang with a certain self-righteous moral outrage, “Hey Farmer Farmer, put away that DDT now. Give me spots on my apples, but leave me the birds and the bees.”
Poor farmer farmer had no choice choice. In spite of questionable science, the heavy hand of the federal government slammed down, and within a year after Mitchell’s song became a hit, DDT was banned in the United States. No problem for Americans and Canadians – spraying had already eliminated malaria and yellow fever. Big problem for parts of the world still suffering the scourge.
The American ban reverberated around the world. Africans could actually afford to use DDT, were they allowed. But large, multinational green organizations with massive budgets blew the risks of DDT so out of proportion that it became virtually impossible to use it. After the US ban worldwide deaths from DDT skyrocketed as did the budgets of the green multinationals.
Greens congratulated themselves on a prodigious victory, on being caring people. The fact is that organic coffee is more dangerous than equal concentrations of DDT. Joni Mitchell could have birds birds and fifty million people did not need to die.
Today DDT is still the best agent against mosquitoes. Despite decades of rhetoric against it there is nothing anywhere near as good or as safe.
But the eco-hysteria of radical environmentalists, who worry more about overpopulation than human rights, knows no reasonable boundaries. Environmental activists should be ashamed of their role in promoting the demonization of a cheap life-saving pesticide. Instead they receive Nobel peace prizes.
This is not environmental justice. It is scandalous eco-hysteria, with terrible results.

Conclusion

Eco-hysteria also imposes unreasonable economic costs, resulting in lower standards of living. The fragile “Earth in the balance” scenario is fake. It satisfies emotional needs, but does not comport with the data. It does not comport with scientific data.[ix] And it does not comport with biblical data, such as Genesis 8:22: “While the Earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.”
The greatest challenge facing mankind, the biggest crisis, is not ultimately environmental. We are not mere products of our environment, as evolutionists and materialists teach. The greatest problem is spiritual. This sin problem leads to all the other problems that we so keenly feel. The problem is that of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda.
World Malaria Day comes three days after Earth Day. Ironically, if it were not for Earth Day there would be no World Malaria Day.


[i] David E. Thigpen, In Chicago, Jesse on the Spot, Time Magazine, February 24, 2003.
[ii] Paul Waldie, Healthy Polar Bear Count confounds doomsayers, The Globe and Mail, 5 April 2012.
[iii] Elisabeth Rosenthal, Rush to Use Crops as Fuel Raises Food Prices and Hunger Fears, New York Times, 7 April 2011, p. A1.
[iv] Paul Reiter, The inconvenient truth about malaria, The Spectator, 2 December 2009; online at http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/5592863/the-inconvenient-truth-about-malaria/, last viewed 1/25/2013.
[v] Curtis R . Best, A History of Mosquitoes in Massachusetts, Northeastern Mosquito Control Association, November 1993.
[vi] Peter T. Harstad, Sickness and Disease on the Wisconsin Frontier: Malaria, 1820 – 1850, Wisconsin Magazine of History, volume 43, 2, Winter 1959-1960.
[vii] Malaria on the Hudson, The New York Times, October 10, 1878.
[viii] J. Dick McLean, and Brian J. Ward, the return of Swamp fever: malaria in Canadians, Journal of the Canadian medical Association, January 26, 1999; 160 (2), 211-212.
[ix] Peter Kareiva, Michelle Marvier, Robert Lalasz, Conservation in the Anthropocene, Breakthrough Journal, Winter 2012; online at http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/journal/past-issues/issue-2/conservation-in-the-anthropocene/, last viewed 1/25/2013.

World Malaria Day, 25 April 2013

$
0
0

World Malaria Day, 25 April 2013

Invest in the future. Defeat malaria.

Over the last decade, the world has made major progress in the fight against malaria. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen by more than 25%, and 50 of the 99 countries with ongoing transmission are now on track to meet the 2015 World Health Assembly target of reducing incidence rates by more than 75%. A major scale-up of vector control interventions, together with increased access to diagnostic testing and quality-assured treatment, has been key to this progress.
But we are not there yet. Malaria still kills an estimated 660 000 people worldwide, mainly children under five years of age in sub-Saharan Africa. Every year, more than 200 million cases occur; most of these cases are never tested or registered. A recent plateauing of international funding has slowed down progress, and emerging drug and insecticide resistance threaten to reverse recent gains.
If the world is to maintain and accelerate progress against malaria, in line with Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 6, and to ensure attainment of MDGs 4 and 5, more funds are urgently required.
The theme for 2013 and the coming years is: Invest in the future. Defeat malaria.

Goal: energize commitment to fight malaria

World Malaria Day was instituted by WHO Member States during the World Health Assembly of 2007. It is an occasion to highlight the need for continued investment and sustained political commitment for malaria prevention and control. It is also an opportunity:
  • for countries in affected regions to learn from each other's experiences and support each other's efforts;
  • for new donors to join a global partnership against malaria;
  • for research and academic institutions to flag scientific advances to both experts and the general public; and
  • for international partners, companies and foundations to showcase their efforts and reflect on how to further scale up interventions.
WHO will use this opportunity to illustrate best practices in a range of settings where malaria is a major health challenge, and will facilitate the sharing of experiences between countries to adapt and strengthen malaria control efforts.

Key facts oif maleria

$
0
0

Key facts

  • Malaria is a life-threatening disease caused by parasites that are transmitted to people through the bites of infected mosquitoes.
  • In 2010, malaria caused an estimated 660 000 deaths (with an uncertainty range of 490 000 to 836 000), mostly among African children.
  • Malaria is preventable and curable.
  • Increased malaria prevention and control measures are dramatically reducing the malaria burden in many places.
  • Non-immune travellers from malaria-free areas are very vulnerable to the disease when they get infected.
  •  http://magazine.jhsph.edu/sebin/p/e/full_cycle.jpg

According to the latest estimates, there were about 219 million cases of malaria in 2010 (with an uncertainty range of 154 million to 289 million) and an estimated 660 000 deaths (with an uncertainty range of 490 000 to 836 000). Malaria mortality rates have fallen by more than 25% globally since 2000, and by 33% in the WHO African Region. Most deaths occur among children living in Africa where a child dies every minute from malaria. Country-level burden estimates available for 2010 show that an estimated 80% of malaria deaths occur in just 14 countries and about 80% of cases occur in 17 countries. Together, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Nigeria account for over 40% of the estimated total of malaria deaths globally.
Malaria is caused by Plasmodium parasites. The parasites are spread to people through the bites of infected Anopheles mosquitoes, called "malaria vectors", which bite mainly between dusk and dawn.
There are four parasite species that cause malaria in humans:
  • Plasmodium falciparum
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Plasmodium malariae
  • Plasmodium ovale.
Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are the most common. Plasmodium falciparum is the most deadly.
In recent years, some human cases of malaria have also occurred with Plasmodium knowlesi– a species that causes malaria among monkeys and occurs in certain forested areas of South-East Asia.

Transmission

Malaria is transmitted exclusively through the bites of Anopheles mosquitoes. The intensity of transmission depends on factors related to the parasite, the vector, the human host, and the environment.
About 20 different Anopheles species are locally important around the world. All of the important vector species bite at night. Anopheles mosquitoes breed in water and each species has its own breeding preference; for example some prefer shallow collections of fresh water, such as puddles, rice fields, and hoof prints. Transmission is more intense in places where the mosquito lifespan is longer (so that the parasite has time to complete its development inside the mosquito) and where it prefers to bite humans rather than other animals. For example, the long lifespan and strong human-biting habit of the African vector species is the main reason why more than 90% of the world's malaria deaths are in Africa.
Transmission also depends on climatic conditions that may affect the number and survival of mosquitoes, such as rainfall patterns, temperature and humidity. In many places, transmission is seasonal, with the peak during and just after the rainy season. Malaria epidemics can occur when climate and other conditions suddenly favour transmission in areas where people have little or no immunity to malaria. They can also occur when people with low immunity move into areas with intense malaria transmission, for instance to find work, or as refugees.
Human immunity is another important factor, especially among adults in areas of moderate or intense transmission conditions. Partial immunity is developed over years of exposure, and while it never provides complete protection, it does reduce the risk that malaria infection will cause severe disease. For this reason, most malaria deaths in Africa occur in young children, whereas in areas with less transmission and low immunity, all age groups are at risk.

Symptoms

Malaria is an acute febrile illness. In a non-immune individual, symptoms appear seven days or more (usually 10–15 days) after the infective mosquito bite. The first symptoms – fever, headache, chills and vomiting – may be mild and difficult to recognize as malaria. If not treated within 24 hours, P. falciparum malaria can progress to severe illness often leading to death. Children with severe malaria frequently develop one or more of the following symptoms: severe anaemia, respiratory distress in relation to metabolic acidosis, or cerebral malaria. In adults, multi-organ involvement is also frequent. In malaria endemic areas, persons may develop partial immunity, allowing asymptomatic infections to occur.
For both P. vivax and P. ovale, clinical relapses may occur weeks to months after the first infection, even if the patient has left the malarious area. These new episodes arise from dormant liver forms known as hypnozoites (absent in P. falciparum and P. malariae); special treatment – targeted at these liver stages – is required for a complete cure.

Who is at risk?

Approximately half of the world's population is at risk of malaria. Most malaria cases and deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. However, Asia, Latin America, and to a lesser extent the Middle East and parts of Europe are also affected. In 2011, 99 countries and territories had ongoing malaria transmission.
Specific population risk groups include:
  • young children in stable transmission areas who have not yet developed protective immunity against the most severe forms of the disease;
  • non-immune pregnant women as malaria causes high rates of miscarriage and can lead to maternal death;
  • semi-immune pregnant women in areas of high transmission. Malaria can result in miscarriage and low birth weight, especially during first and second pregnancies;
  • semi-immune HIV-infected pregnant women in stable transmission areas, during all pregnancies. Women with malaria infection of the placenta also have a higher risk of passing HIV infection to their newborns;
  • people with HIV/AIDS;
  • international travellers from non-endemic areas because they lack immunity;
  • immigrants from endemic areas and their children living in non-endemic areas and returning to their home countries to visit friends and relatives are similarly at risk because of waning or absent immunity.

Diagnosis and treatment

Early diagnosis and treatment of malaria reduces disease and prevents deaths. It also contributes to reducing malaria transmission.
The best available treatment, particularly for P. falciparum malaria, is artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT).
WHO recommends that all cases of suspected malaria be confirmed using parasite-based diagnostic testing (either microscopy or rapid diagnostic test) before administering treatment. Results of parasitological confirmation can be available in 15 minutes or less. Treatment solely on the basis of symptoms should only be considered when a parasitological diagnosis is not possible. More detailed recommendations are available in the Guidelines for the treatment of malaria (second edition).

Antimalarial drug resistance

Resistance to antimalarial medicines is a recurring problem. Resistance of P. falciparum to previous generations of medicines, such as chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), became widespread in the 1970s and 1980s, undermining malaria control efforts and reversing gains in child survival.
In recent years, parasite resistance to artemisinins has been detected in four countries of the Greater Mekong subregion: Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand and Viet Nam. While there are likely many factors that contribute to the emergence and spread of resistance, the use of oral artemisinins alone, as monotherapy, is thought to be an important driver. When treated with an oral artemisinin-based monotherapy, patients may discontinue treatment prematurely following the rapid disappearance of malaria symptoms. This results in incomplete treatment, and such patients still have persistent parasites in their blood. Without a second drug given as part of a combination (as is provided with an ACT), these resistant parasites survive and can be passed on to a mosquito and then another person.
If resistance to artemisinins develops and spreads to other large geographical areas, the public health consequences could be dire, as no alternative antimalarial medicines will be available for at least five years.
WHO recommends the routine monitoring of antimalarial drug resistance, and supports countries to strengthen their efforts in this important area of work.
More comprehensive recommendations are available in the WHO Global Plan for Artemisinin Resistance Containment (GPARC), which was released in 2011.

Prevention

Vector control is the main way to reduce malaria transmission at the community level. It is the only intervention that can reduce malaria transmission from very high levels to close to zero.
For individuals, personal protection against mosquito bites represents the first line of defence for malaria prevention.
Two forms of vector control are effective in a wide range of circumstances.
Insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs)
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the preferred form of ITNs for public health distribution programmes. WHO recommends coverage for all at-risk persons; and in most settings. The most cost effective way to achieve this is through provision of free LLINs, so that everyone sleeps under a LLIN every night.
Indoor spraying with residual insecticides
Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with insecticides is a powerful way to rapidly reduce malaria transmission. Its full potential is realized when at least 80% of houses in targeted areas are sprayed. Indoor spraying is effective for 3–6 months, depending on the insecticide used and the type of surface on which it is sprayed. DDT can be effective for 9–12 months in some cases. Longer-lasting forms of existing IRS insecticides, as well as new classes of insecticides for use in IRS programmes, are under development.
Antimalarial medicines can also be used to prevent malaria. For travellers, malaria can be prevented through chemoprophylaxis, which suppresses the blood stage of malaria infections, thereby preventing malaria disease. In addition, WHO recommends intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for pregnant women living in high transmission areas, at each scheduled antenatal visit after the first trimester. Similarly, for infants living in high-transmission areas of Africa, 3 doses of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is recommended delivered alongside routine vaccinations. In 2012, WHO recommended Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention as an additional malaria prevention strategy for areas of the Sahel sub-Region of Africa. The strategy involves the administration of monthly courses of amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to all children under 5 years of age during the high transmission season.

Insecticide resistance

Much of the success to date in controlling malaria is due to vector control. Vector control is highly dependent on the use of pyrethroids, which are the only class of insecticides currently recommended for ITNs or LLINs. In recent years, mosquito resistance to pyrethroids has emerged in many countries. In some areas, resistance to all four classes of insecticides used for public health has been detected. Fortunately, this resistance has only rarely been associated with decreased efficacy, and LLINs and IRS remain highly effective tools in almost all settings.
However, countries in sub-Saharan Africa and India are of significant concern. These countries are characterized by high levels of malaria transmission and widespread reports of insecticide resistance. The development of new, alternative insecticides is a high priority and several promising products are in the pipeline.. Development of new insecticides for use on bed nets is a particular priority.
Detection of insecticide resistance should be an essential component of all national malaria control efforts to ensure that the most effective vector control methods are being used. The choice of insecticide for IRS should always be informed by recent, local data on the susceptibility target vectors.
In order to ensure a timely and coordinated global response to the threat of insecticide resistance, WHO has worked with a wide range of stakeholders to develop the Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management in malaria vectors (GPIRM), which was released in May 2012. The GPIRM puts forward a five-pillar strategy calling on the global malaria community to:
  • plan and implement insecticide resistance management strategies in malaria-endemic countries;
  • ensure proper and timely entomological and resistance monitoring, and effective data management;
  • develop new and innovative vector control tools;
  • fill gaps in knowledge on mechanisms of insecticide resistance and the impact of current insecticide resistance management approaches; and
  • ensure that enabling mechanisms (advocacy as well as human and financial resources) are in place.

Surveillance

Tracking progress is a major challenge in malaria control. Malaria surveillance systems detect only around 10% of the estimated global number of cases. Stronger malaria surveillance systems are urgently needed to enable a timely and effective malaria response in endemic regions, to prevent outbreaks and resurgences, to track progress, and to hold governments and the global malaria community accountable. In April 2012, the WHO Director-General launched new global surveillance manuals for malaria control and elimination, and urged endemic countries to strengthen their surveillance systems for malaria. This was embeddedpart of in a larger call to scale up diagnostic testing, treatment and surveillance for malaria, known as WHO’s T3: Test. Treat. Track initiative.

Elimination

Malaria elimination is defined as interrupting local mosquito-borne malaria transmission in a defined geographical area, i.e. zero incidence of locally contracted cases. Malaria eradication is defined as the permanent reduction to zero of the worldwide incidence of malaria infection caused by a specific agent; i.e. applies to a particular malaria parasite species.
Many countries – especially in temperate and sub-tropical zones – have been successful in eliminating malaria. The global malaria eradication campaign, launched by WHO in 1955, was successful in eliminating the disease in some countries, but ultimately failed to achieve its overall goal, thus being abandoned less than two decades later in favour of the less ambitious goal of malaria control. In recent years, however, interest in malaria eradication as a long-term goal has re-emerged.
Large-scale use of WHO-recommended strategies, currently available tools, strong national commitments, and coordinated efforts with partners, will enable more countries – particularly those where malaria transmission is low and unstable – to progress towards malaria elimination. In recent years, 4 countries have been certified by the WHO Director-General as having eliminated malaria: United Arab Emirates (2007), Morocco (2010), Turkmenistan (2010), and Armenia (2011).

Vaccines against malaria

There are currently no licensed vaccines against malaria or any other human parasite. One research vaccine against P. falciparum, known as RTS,S/AS01, is most advanced. This vaccine is currently being evaluated in a large clinical trial in 7 countries in Africa. A WHO recommendation for use will depend on the final results from the large clinical trial. These final results are expected in late 2014, and a recommendation as to whether or not this vaccine should be added to existing malaria control tools is expected in 2015.

WHO response

The WHO Global Malaria Programme (GMP) is responsible for charting the course for malaria control and elimination through:
  • setting, communicating and promoting the adoption of evidence-based norms, standards, policies, technical strategies, and guidelines;
  • keeping independent score of global progress;
  • developing approaches for capacity building, systems strengthening, and surveillance;
  • identifying threats to malaria control and elimination as well as new areas for action.
GMP serves as the secretariat for the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC), a group of 15 global malaria experts appointed following an open nomination process. The MPAC, which meets twice yearly, provides independent advice to WHO to develop policy recommendations for the control and elimination of malaria. The mandate of MPAC is to provide strategic advice and technical input, and extends to all aspects of malaria control and elimination, as part of a transparent, responsive and credible policy setting process.
WHO is also a co-founder and host of the Roll Back Malaria partnership, which is the global framework to implement coordinated action against malaria. The partnership mobilizes for action and resources and forges consensus among partners. It is comprised of over 500 partners, including malaria endemic countries, development partners, the private sector, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, foundations, and research and academic institutions.

For more information contact:

WHO Media centre
Telephone: +41 22 791 2222
E-mail: mediainquiries@who.int

The natural ecology of malaria

$
0
0
The natural ecology of malaria involves malaria parasites infecting successively two types of hosts: humans and female Anopheles mosquitoes. In humans, the parasites grow and multiply first in the liver cells and then in the red cells of the blood. In the blood, successive broods of parasites grow inside the red cells and destroy them, releasing daughter parasites ("merozoites") that continue the cycle by invading other red cells.
The blood stage parasites are those that cause the symptoms of malaria. When certain forms of blood stage parasites ("gametocytes") are picked up by a female Anopheles mosquito during a blood meal, they start another, different cycle of growth and multiplication in the mosquito.
After 10-18 days, the parasites are found (as "sporozoites") in the mosquito's salivary glands. When the Anopheles mosquito takes a blood meal on another human, the sporozoites are injected with the mosquito's saliva and start another human infection when they parasitize the liver cells.
Thus the mosquito carries the disease from one human to another (acting as a "vector"). Differently from the human host, the mosquito vector does not suffer from the presence of the parasites.
An image depicting the Life Cycle of the Malaria Parasite
The malaria parasite life cycle involves two hosts. During a blood meal, a malaria-infected female Anopheles mosquito inoculates sporozoites into the human host 1. Sporozoites infect liver cells 2and mature into schizonts 3, which rupture and release merozoites 4. (Of note, in P. vivax and P. ovale a dormant stage [hypnozoites] can persist in the liver and cause relapses by invading the bloodstream weeks, or even years later.) After this initial replication in the liver (exo-erythrocytic schizogony A), the parasites undergo asexual multiplication in the erythrocytes (erythrocytic schizogony B). Merozoites infect red blood cells 5. The ring stage trophozoites mature into schizonts, which rupture releasing merozoites 6. Some parasites differentiate into sexual erythrocytic stages (gametocytes) 7. Blood stage parasites are responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease.
The gametocytes, male (microgametocytes) and female (macrogametocytes), are ingested by an Anopheles mosquito during a blood meal 8. The parasites’ multiplication in the mosquito is known as the sporogonic cycle C. While in the mosquito's stomach, the microgametes penetrate the macrogametes generating zygotes 9. The zygotes in turn become motile and elongated (ookinetes) 10which invade the midgut wall of the mosquito where they develop into oocysts 11. The oocysts grow, rupture, and release sporozoites 12, which make their way to the mosquito's salivary glands. Inoculation of the sporozoites 1into a new human host perpetuates the malaria life cycle.

Anopheles Mosquitoes

$
0
0

Anopheles Mosquitoes

Diagram of Adult Female Mosquito

Malaria is transmitted among humans by female mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles. Female mosquitoes take blood meals to carry out egg production, and such blood meals are the link between the human and the mosquito hosts in the parasite life cycle. The successful development of the malaria parasite in the mosquito (from the "gametocyte" stage to the "sporozoite" stage) depends on several factors. The most important is ambient temperature and humidity (higher temperatures accelerate the parasite growth in the mosquito) and whether the Anopheles survives long enough to allow the parasite to complete its cycle in the mosquito host ("sporogonic" or "extrinsic" cycle, duration 10 to 18 days). Differently from the human host, the mosquito host does not suffer noticeably from the presence of the parasites.

General Information

Thumbnail of the mosquito distribution map.
ap of the world showing the distribution of predominant malaria vectors
Larger Picture
There are approximately 3,500 species of mosquitoes grouped into 41 genera. Human malaria is transmitted only by females of the genus Anopheles. Of the approximately 430 Anopheles species, only 30-40 transmit malaria (i.e., are "vectors") in nature.

Geographic Distribution

Anophelines are found worldwide except Antarctica. Malaria is transmitted by different Anopheles species, depending on the region and the environment.
Anophelines that can transmit malaria are found not only in malaria-endemic areas, but also in areas where malaria has been eliminated. The latter areas are thus constantly at risk of re-introduction of the disease.
Anopheles freeborni mosquito pumping blood
Anopheles freeborni mosquito pumping blood
Larger Picture
Powerpoint slide of Anopheles freeborni mosquito pumping blood
Sequential images of the mosquito taking its blood meal


Life Stages

Like all mosquitoes, anophelines go through four stages in their life cycle: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The first three stages are aquatic and last 5-14 days, depending on the species and the ambient temperature. The adult stage is when the female Anopheles mosquito acts as malaria vector. The adult females can live up to a month (or more in captivity) but most probably do not live more than 1-2 weeks in nature.
Top: Anopheles Egg; note the lateral floats. Bottom: Anopheles eggs are laid singly
Top: Anopheles Egg; note the lateral floats.
Bottom: Anopheles eggs are laid singly.

Eggs

Adult females lay 50-200 eggs per oviposition. Eggs are laid singly directly on water and are unique in having floats on either side. Eggs are not resistant to drying and hatch within 2-3 days, although hatching may take up to 2-3 weeks in colder climates.

Larvae

Mosquito larvae have a well-developed head with mouth brushes used for feeding, a large thorax, and a segmented abdomen. They have no legs. In contrast to other mosquitoes, Anopheles larvae lack a respiratory siphon and for this reason position themselves so that their body is parallel to the surface of the water.
Larvae breathe through spiracles located on the 8th abdominal segment and therefore must come to the surface frequently.
Image of a Anopheles larva, floating parallel to water surface
Anopheles Larva. Note the position, parallel to the water surface.
The larvae spend most of their time feeding on algae, bacteria, and other microorganisms in the surface microlayer. They dive below the surface only when disturbed. Larvae swim either by jerky movements of the entire body or through propulsion with the mouth brushes.
Larvae develop through 4 stages, or instars, after which they metamorphose into pupae. At the end of each instar, the larvae molt, shedding their exoskeleton, or skin, to allow for further growth.
Larvae of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in Africa, can breed in very diverse habitats. Tire tracks habitat.
Larvae of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in Africa, can breed in very diverse habitats. Rice fields habitat
Larvae of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in Africa, can breed in very diverse habitats. Irrigation water habitat.
Larvae of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in Africa, can breed in diverse habitats. Three habitats are shown from left to right: tire tracks, rice fields, and irrigation water.

The larvae occur in a wide range of habitats but most species prefer clean, unpolluted water. Larvae of Anopheles mosquitoes have been found in fresh- or salt-water marshes, mangrove swamps, rice fields, grassy ditches, the edges of streams and rivers, and small, temporary rain pools. Many species prefer habitats with vegetation. Others prefer habitats that have none. Some breed in open, sun-lit pools while others are found only in shaded breeding sites in forests. A few species breed in tree holes or the leaf axils of some plants.
Graph of pupa of Anopheles, illustrating coma shape
Anopheles Pupa

Pupae

The pupa is comma-shaped when viewed from the side. The head and thorax are merged into a cephalothorax with the abdomen curving around underneath. As with the larvae, pupae must come to the surface frequently to breathe, which they do through a pair of respiratory trumpets on the cephalothorax. After a few days as a pupa, the dorsal surface of the cephalothorax splits and the adult mosquito emerges.
The duration from egg to adult varies considerably among species and is strongly influenced by ambient temperature. Mosquitoes can develop from egg to adult in as little as 5 days but usually take 10-14 days in tropical conditions.
Schema of adult Anopheles seen from above, and from the side to show typical resting position)
Anopheles Adults. Note (bottom row) the typical resting position.

Adults

Like all mosquitoes, adult anophelines have slender bodies with 3 sections: head, thorax and abdomen.
The head is specialized for acquiring sensory information and for feeding. The head contains the eyes and a pair of long, many-segmented antennae. The antennae are important for detecting host odors as well as odors of breeding sites where females lay eggs. The head also has an elongate, forward-projecting proboscis used for feeding, and two sensory palps.
The thorax is specialized for locomotion. Three pairs of legs and a pair of wings are attached to the thorax.
The abdomen is specialized for food digestion and egg development. This segmented body part expands considerably when a female takes a blood meal. The blood is digested over time serving as a source of protein for the production of eggs, which gradually fill the abdomen.
Anopheles mosquitoes can be distinguished from other mosquitoes by the palps, which are as long as the proboscis, and by the presence of discrete blocks of black and white scales on the wings. Adult Anopheles can also be identified by their typical resting position: males and females rest with their abdomens sticking up in the air rather than parallel to the surface on which they are resting.
Adult mosquitoes usually mate within a few days after emerging from the pupal stage. In most species, the males form large swarms, usually around dusk, and the females fly into the swarms to mate.
Female Anopheles dirus Feeding
Female Anopheles dirus feeding
Males live for about a week, feeding on nectar and other sources of sugar. Females will also feed on sugar sources for energy but usually require a blood meal for the development of eggs. After obtaining a full blood meal, the female will rest for a few days while the blood is digested and eggs are developed. This process depends on the temperature but usually takes 2-3 days in tropical conditions. Once the eggs are fully developed, the female lays them and resumes host seeking.
The cycle repeats itself until the female dies. Females can survive up to a month (or longer in captivity) but most probably do not live longer than 1-2 weeks in nature. Their chances of survival depend on temperature and humidity, but also their ability to successfully obtain a blood meal while avoiding host defenses.

Factors Involved in Malaria Transmission and Malaria Control

Understanding the biology and behavior of Anopheles mosquitoes can help understand how malaria is transmitted and can aid in designing appropriate control strategies. Factors that affect a mosquito's ability to transmit malaria include its innate susceptibility to Plasmodium, its host choice, and its longevity. Factors that should be taken into consideration when designing a control program include the susceptibility of malaria vectors to insecticides and the preferred feeding and resting location of adult mosquitoes.

Preferred Sources for Blood Meals

One important behavioral factor is the degree to which an Anopheles species prefers to feed on humans (anthropophily) or animals such as cattle (zoophily). Anthrophilic Anopheles are more likely to transmit the malaria parasites from one person to another. Most Anopheles mosquitoes are not exclusively anthropophilic or zoophilic. However, the primary malaria vectors in Africa, An. gambiae and An. funestus, are strongly anthropophilic and, consequently, are two of the most efficient malaria vectors in the world.

Life Span

Once ingested by a mosquito, malaria parasites must undergo development within the mosquito before they are infectious to humans. The time required for development in the mosquito (the extrinsic incubation period) ranges from 10 to 21 days, depending on the parasite species and the temperature. If a mosquito does not survive longer than the extrinsic incubation period, then she will not be able to transmit any malaria parasites.
It is not possible to measure directly the life span of mosquitoes in nature. But indirect estimates of daily survivorship have been made for several Anopheles species. Estimates of daily survivorship of An. gambiae in Tanzania ranged from 0.77 to 0.84 meaning that at the end of one day between 77% and 84% will have survived. (Charlwood et al., 1997, Survival And Infection Probabilities of Anthropophagic Anophelines From An Area of High Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum in Humans, Bulletin of Entomological Research, 87, 445-453).
Assuming this is constant through the adult life of a mosquito, less than 10% of female An. gambiae would survive longer than a 14-day extrinsic incubation period. If daily survivorship increased to 0.9, over 20% of mosquitoes would survive longer than a 14-day extrinsic incubation period. Control measures that rely on insecticides (e.g., indoor residual spraying) may actually impact malaria transmission more through their effect on adult longevity than through their effect on the population of adult mosquitoes.

Patterns of Feeding and Resting

Most Anopheles mosquitoes are crepuscular (active at dusk or dawn) or nocturnal (active at night). Some Anopheles mosquitoes feed indoors (endophagic) while others feed outdoors (exophagic). After blood feeding, some Anopheles mosquitoes prefer to rest indoors (endophilic) while others prefer to rest outdoors (exophilic). Biting by nocturnal, endophagic Anopheles mosquitoes can be markedly reduced through the use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) or through improved housing construction to prevent mosquito entry (e.g., window screens). Endophilic mosquitoes are readily controlled by indoor spraying of residual insecticides. In contrast, exophagic/exophilic vectors are best controlled through source reduction (destruction of the breeding sites).

Insecticide Resistance

Insecticide-based control measures (e.g., indoor spraying with insecticides, ITNs) are the principal way to kill mosquitoes that bite indoors. However, after prolonged exposure to an insecticide over several generations, mosquitoes, like other insects, may develop resistance, a capacity to survive contact with an insecticide. Since mosquitoes can have many generations per year, high levels of resistance can arise very quickly. Resistance of mosquitoes to some insecticides has been documented just within a few years after the insecticides were introduced. There are over 125 mosquito species with documented resistance to one or more insecticides. The development of resistance to insecticides used for indoor residual spraying was a major impediment during the Global Malaria Eradication Campaign. Judicious use of insecticides for mosquito control can limit the development and spread of resistance. However, use of insecticides in agriculture has often been implicated as contributing to resistance in mosquito populations. It is possible to detect developing resistance in mosquitoes and control programs are well advised to conduct surveillance for this potential problem.

Mosquito Facts: All About Mosquitoes

$
0
0

Mosquito Facts: All About Mosquitoes

When most people think of mosquitoes, they think of that annoying mosquito sound and that even more annoying mosquito bite. Believe it or not, there is much more to mosquitoes than you think - and you're about to learn all those mosquito facts!

Mosquito Anatomy

If you're like most people, you're so busy swatting when you see a mosquito that you've never had the time to examine one. At a glimpse, mosquitoes look like angry little critters that want nothing more than to suck your blood and make your itchy skin miserable. While that might be true in a sense, here are some of the mosquito facts you may have missed while you were busy trying to kill that dreaded mosquito.
  • The three main parts of a mosquito are its head, its abdomen, and its thorax
  • A mosquito has two eyes that make up the majority of its head. Each eye is filled with little lenses so it can see from multiple directions at once - thus making it almost impossible to swat that dreaded mosquito
  • A mosquito has one pair of wings coming off its thorax
  • A mosquito has six legs
  • Upon close inspection, a mosquito's abdomen has distinct markings that make it possible to tell which species it is
  • Mosquitoes are approximately 16 millimeters long
  • The average weight of a mosquito is about 2.5 milligrams
Did you ever notice any of those mosquito facts before? If not, you'll be sure to notice them the next time you hear that annoying mosquito sound!

Mosquito Gender Roles

You may think all mosquitoes are out to get you, but that's simply not true. Similar to other insect species like the praying mantis, only female mosquitoes are a threat to humans. As you read through the differences between female mosquitoes and male mosquitoes, be prepared for some surprises!
  • Both male and female mosquitoes eat flower nectar for nourishment
  • Female mosquitoes bite humans and animals so they can receive protein. This protein helps them lay eggs, thus bringing more blood-sucking mosquitoes into the world
  • A female mosquito has a ridged proboscis to pierce human and animal skin. Because of the serrated edges of her proboscis, her bite usually goes undetected until the itchiness sets in
  • A male mosquito has a proboscis, but it does not have ragged edges for biting
  • Male mosquitoes are slightly smaller than females
  • Only female mosquitoes make that annoying mosquito sound that puts you on red alert
It's amazing to see the difference genders can make, isn't it!? Now you can rest at ease when you see a mosquito that doesn't make noise and only save your jumping for those pesky females that love to buzz before they bite.

Mosquito Control

The most important mosquito fact that people usually want to know is how to get rid of that dreaded mosquito in the first place. There are many mosquito control products on the market, but you should certainly keep some tips in mind before you go on a mosquito prevention and control shopping spree!
  • Mosquito repellant lotion and mosquito spray can certainly keep mosquitoes from biting you, but you must be sure to reapply often if you are outside in a highly populated mosquito area
  • Mosquito fog can help reduce the number of mosquitoes on your property, but this is not the best solution for the environment
  • Mosquito sprays (especially aerosol ones) are effective, but they are bad for the environment
  • Garlic mosquito repellant is fairly effective, which just goes to show why vampires are afraid of garlic, too
  • Mosquito net fabric can be used to surround your bed, your gazebo, or your favorite chair. Just remember that the second you step out from under the fabric, you are at risk again
  • Mosquito zappers may be popular, but they very rarely capture mosquitoes
  • A revolutionary breakthrough in mosquito control comes in the form of a product called Mega-CatchTM, a mosquito trap that safely lures mosquitoes with UV lighting, C02 octenol, and heat.
No matter what type of mosquito prevention and control methods you use, remember that the best mosquito trap is the kind that is as effective as it is safe for you, your family, and the environment.

Mosquito History

Even though your first instinct when you see a mosquito is to kill it and make it history, you may be surprised to learn a bit about the real history of mosquitoes. Here is a quick tutorial on mosquito evolution and history.
  • Mosquitoes were around in the Jurassic era when dinosaurs ran free and they are still just as strong today
  • Scientists believe that mosquitoes originated in South Africa and eventually spread to the rest of the world
  • Mosquitoes have evolved to the point where there are approximately 2,700 different species of mosquitoes
  • Ancient mosquitoes were up to three times larger than today's mosquitoes
  • The word mosquito actually means "biting fly"
  • Some cultures associate mosquitoes with reincarnations of dead people

Mosquito Feeding Facts

Have you ever felt like a mosquito went out of its way to bite you? If so, then there's a good chance you were right. Here are some of the most likely targets for mosquito bites and unwanted attacks.
  • Mosquitoes are more attracted to women than to men
  • If given the choice, mosquitoes would usually rather drink blood from a blonde
  • Mosquitoes like to aim for moving targets
  • Many mosquitoes target people in dark clothing
  • When female mosquitoes drink blood, they purify the blood in their systems and leave a small puddle of urine on their victim's skin. That is why when you first get bit, you may notice a small wet spot surrounding the bite
  • On average, female mosquitoes drink from 0.001 to 0.1 millimeters of blood per feeding
  • Mosquitoes are more prone to attacking people and animals during a full moon

Random Mosquito Facts

As irritating as they may be, mosquitoes can actually be quite fascinating - as long as they're not biting you. Be sure to set up your Mega-CatchTM or put on your DEET repellant so you can enjoy this random trivia you never knew about mosquitoes!
  • Even though they seem to move quickly, the average mosquito can only fly up to 1.5 miles per hour
  • Mosquitoes cannot fly too high; they fly somewhere between 25 and 40 feet up in the air
  • Most mosquito species can only fly about 300 feet before they need to rest
  • Mosquitoes from salt marshes can fly up to 40 miles for their next meal
  • When a mosquito flies, it flaps its wings between 400 and 700 times per second
  • Mosquito saliva has some of the same ingredients as rat poison
  • Any fans of mosquitoes can go to the annual Great Texas Mosquito Festival where mosquitoes are honored in the strangest of ways
There you have it. Mosquitoes may only be known for a few things, but now that you've read these mosquito facts, you know much more about mosquitoes than you ever thought you would. So remember your trivia, tell your friends, and the next time you see a mosquito, be happy that you can at least be more knowledgeable as you swat it.
Viewing all 8088 articles
Browse latest View live