Quantcast
Channel: EHSQL(Environment-Energy ,Health,Safety, Security and Social Ac. ,Quality-Lab) Technical services
Viewing all 8075 articles
Browse latest View live

Blast: HPCL CMD promises probe

$
0
0

Blast: HPCL CMD promises probe


CPI (M) State secretariat member Ch. Narsinga Rao posing a question to HPCL Chairman and Managing Director S. Roy Choudhury and Executive Director V.V.L. Narasimham as MP T.Subbarami Reddy and Visakha West MLA Malla Vijaya Prasad look on at a review meeting in Visakhapatnam on Monday. Photo: K.R. Deepak
CPI (M) State secretariat member Ch. Narsinga Rao posing a question to HPCL Chairman and Managing Director S. Roy Choudhury and Executive Director V.V.L. Narasimham as MP T.Subbarami Reddy and Visakha West MLA Malla Vijaya Prasad look on at a review meeting in Visakhapatnam on Monday. Photo: K.R. Deepak

Says state-of-the-art facilities installed to fight fires and prevent accidents

HPCL Chairman and Managing Director S. Roy Choudhury on Monday said they could curtail the damage due to blast and fire leading to collapse of cooling tower at the Visakh Refinery by taking timely action.
Stating that they had installed world-class fire fighting equipment, he told reporters that they could prevent spread of fire to other sensitive units of the refinery due to immediate intervention.
Earlier, Rajya Sabha member T. Subbarami Reddy, Congress MLAs Malla Vijay Prasad and Ch. Venkataramaiah, CPI (M) State secretariat member Ch. Narsinga Rao and others interacted with Mr. Choudhury and other top officials of the HPCL and demanded enhanced compensation and permanent jobs to kin of contract workers killed in the blast. Mr. Choudhury said they had installed state-of-the-art facilities to fight fire and prevent accidents and had achieved compliance to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)-Process Safety Management (PSM) standards.
Terming the August 23 blast as most unfortunate, he said they would take action against officials if they were found guilty. Contractors if found responsible would be blacklisted, he stated. He said they would engage international experts and go for third-party check before commissioning any project and promised to conduct probe into the accident with transparency. Due to timely action, fire that gutted Crude Distillation Unit-3 on May 17 was doused without any casualty.
Air ambulance
He said all those injured were being extended best possible health care in super-speciality hospitals. Instead of one-seater, they were trying to engage a three-seater air ambulance to carry patients with less than 50 per cent burns to Mumbai for better care. HPCL doctors have been brought from Mumbai to provide expert guidance.
To a question, HPCL Executive Director V.V.R. Narasimham said they had off-site and on-site emergency response system in place and an arrangement for mutual assistance with neighbouring establishments like the Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and the Andhra Petrochemicals.
The Rajya Sabha MP thanked the HPCL management for agreeing to give compensation to the injured persons and consider jobs of permanent nature through workers’ societies to one member from the families of contract workers killed in the blast.

NFCL IS DEDICATED TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE SYSTEMS WITH RECENTLY RC 14001

$
0
0
 
Today's rapidly changing business environment confronts managers with a complex set of internal and external stakeholder demands. Senior management is seeking increased efficiencies and cost savings to remain competitive in the global marketplace while maintaining a safe workplace. At the same time, an organization's customers seek assurance that it can meet exacting standards for quality; avoid disruptions due to economic, environmental, health, safety and, more recently, security factors; and lower costs through more efficient production and better management of the supply chain. In addition to these important business drivers, managers must continue to respond to the public's environmental, health, safety and security (EHSS) performance expectations for the organization's manufacturing activities, as well as its products, as they move from production to final use and disposal.
The American Chemistry Council's member companies and Responsible Care partners developed the RC14001 technical specification as a tool to better integrate EHSS activities within their business operations while also meeting commercial and other stakeholder demands for improved performance. RC14001 uses the ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS) standard as a platform, adding health and safety and security issues to the management system's scope. RC14001 also includes specific Responsible Care elements related to transportation and supply chain management, product stewardship and stakeholder engagement, all of which require managers to consider hazard and risk issues well beyond their organization's physical boundaries.
Organizations that have conducted RC14001 audits report improvements in the following areas: employee training and awareness, purchasing controls for EHSS service providers and vendors, integration of EHSS goals and objective-setting processes, contractor qualification and selection, integrating internal auditing procedures, and coordination and management of the EHSS-related activities (e.g., sales, marketing, research and development, commercial partner selection, security, etc.) traditionally "owned" at the corporate or business- division level.
Background: ACC and Responsible Care
The American Chemistry Council (www .americanchemistry.com) is the nation's largest trade association representing the business of chemistry. ACC's 130 member companies and their 880,000 employees represent about 85 percent of the total chemical production volume in the United States. These organizations manufacture thousands of products that are essential to our modern way of life.
Responsible Care, the industry's EHSS performance-improvement initiative, was adopted by ACC as an obligation of membership in 1988. In 1992, ACC expanded the initiative's reach by creating a partnership program for organizations such as barge, rail, warehouse, bulk-liquid terminal storage and trucking companies, all of which handle chemicals in the supply chain. The Responsible Care partner program now includes more than 80 companies ranging from class one railroads to logistics management companies.
Responsible Care is centered on key requirements that are intended to improve the overall performance of the industry, respond to stakeholder concerns regarding the industry's operations and its products, and assist companies in improving their overall business operations. These key Responsible Care requirements include annual reporting of specific EHSS performance data on a publicly available Web site (www.responsiblecare-us.com); adhering to a set of guiding principles that establish the framework for EHSS activities; implementing a security code that requires enhancements of physical (i.e., site) security, cyber security and security of products in the supply chain; and certifying Responsible Care management systems through a third-party audit process.
RC14001 was developed as one option for Responsible Care third-party certification for ACC members and partners in 2002. Member companies requested that a process be developed to allow them to meet customer demands for ISO 14001 while also meeting their ACC Responsible Care certification requirements. Successful completion of the audit results in two certificates, one for ISO 14001 and one for RC14001. A second option for certification, known as RCMS, was developed for use by companies that want to meet their ACC certification requirements, but have no need for ISO 14001 certification. Like RC14001, RCMS is a classic policy-plan-do-check-act management system model, but is focused specifically on Responsible Care elements and doesn't include certain requirements found in ISO 14001 and RC14001. RC14001 is available to any organization regardless of its business profile, provided its audit meets ACC certification requirements. (See www.rctoolkit.com for information on the Responsible Care initiative and its key requirements.)
RC14001: building a better management system
The initial question asked by individuals unfamiliar with the Responsible Care certification process concerns the differences between RC14001 and ISO 14001. There are a number of significant differences, beginning with the expanded scope of the audit. RC14001 follows ISO 14001's outline in its entirety, and companies seeking RC14001 certification must demonstrate conformance to ISO 14001 to successfully gain their RC14001 certificate. However, wherever the word "environment" appears in the ISO 14001 text, companies implementing RC14001 are required to add "Responsible Care health, safety and security" to the scope of the activity. The environmental policy now becomes an environment, health, safety and security policy or, better yet, a Responsible Care policy. Aspects and impacts, goals and objectives, and timetables now include a wider range of activities, including health and safety factors as well as security issues.
By expanding the scope of the management system, organizations have the opportunity to take a holistic view of their operations and products and to include multiple management disciplines in the system's development and implementation. As management silos are breached, the organization can begin to take advantage of cross-functional expertise and the more efficient use of pooled resources. RC14001 provides organizations with the opportunity to integrate their processes and procedures in planning, training, compliance monitoring, corrective action and measurement, record keeping, document control and management review. A number of ACC companies are integrating their quality systems with RC14001 to create a truly seamless business operation.
In addition to expanding the scope of the existing ISO 14001 elements, RC14001 includes 27 new requirements in the management system. These additional requirements focus on activities that the chemical industry and other business sectors have historically viewed as critical to the success of Responsible Care (or EHSS for non-ACC companies), including maintaining up-to-date risk information on products and processes, assessing transportation-routing risk for products, recognizing employee EHSS excellence, engaging in proactive outreach and dialogue with stakeholders, participating in industry mutual assistance activities, qualifying commercial partners based on EHSS performance, measuring the EHSS performance of commercial partners, determining if customers can safely handle products, and assessing security vulnerabilities. In many cases, interactions with commercial partners aren't managed at the plant level, so an organization seeking RC14001 certification may be required to include headquarters and/or business unit personnel in the audit process. This can be an eye-opening process for departments and individuals who may have viewed themselves as immune from previous EHSS audits.
RC14001 and the supply chain
The chemical industry, like other sectors, is subject to market forces that require the efficient delivery of product to its customers. In the matter of chemical products, efficient delivery also means getting the product to the customer safely and with minimal disruption due to accidents or worker injuries. Selection of the correct carriers, toll manufacturers, storage facilities and logistics providers to support product movement to customers is a critical piece of the chemical business. Likewise, chemical companies are equally concerned about the ability of customers (and often their customers' customers) to handle their products safely. For more than 15 years, ACC members have worked closely with their commercial partners to steward products through the supply chain, sharing the industry's experience, knowledge and resources to eliminate any possibility that chemicals might be mishandled or otherwise misused.
RC14001 includes a number of requirements that focus on the industry's supply chain concerns and require specific product-stewardship actions, including reviewing EHSS performance when selecting a commercial partner (e.g., carriers, contractors, toll manufacturers, suppliers, etc.), reviewing commercial partners' ongoing performance on a periodic basis, and sharing risk information and working with commercial partners (including customers) to ensure safe handling of products. ACC members have learned that robust interactions on EHSS issues can help solidify existing supply chain relationships, lead to increased business opportunities and spread the Responsible Care ethic to others. RC14001 reinforces these requirements and opportunities.
A new dimension: security
Following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, ACC's member companies quickly closed ranks and moved to further strengthen the security of chemical operations and the chemical supply chain. Although the industry had always been concerned about the security of its operations, it was a traditional focus aimed at maintaining safe working conditions and operations, preventing acts of retaliation by disgruntled employees, or preventing theft of product and/or proprietary information. In 2002, ACC adopted a mandatory security code for its members and Responsible Care partners that required assessments of security vulnerabilities and implementation of countermeasures at company sites, within information technology/cyberstructure and along the supply chain. The code was written in a plan-do-check-act format so it could be incorporated into the RC14001 (and RCMS) management system model.
Organizations seeking RC14001 certification are required to make security an integral part of their management systems. As a result, security issues can be found among company aspects and impacts, employees are receiving security training, countermeasures are being implemented by organizations at their locations and in concert with their commercial partners along the supply chain, and security has become part of the internal checking, corrective action and management review processes. RC14001 certification and its continuing surveillance audits will continue to ensure that robust security programs are part of company management systems.
Ensuring credibility
In creating its Responsible Care certification process, ACC determined that it was necessary to develop a process that met the high expectations of its membership and the industry's stakeholders. Registrars seeking to conduct RC14001 audits must first be accredited to conduct ISO 14001 audits and then must conduct an additional witness audit for RC14001. RC14001 witness audits are conducted under the supervision of the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (www.anab.org) using established processes. As part of its commitment to continuous improvement, ACC is also working with registrars to identify common trends being reported on RC14001 certification audits so it can assist its members in improving their management systems and performance.
Individual auditors must meet ACC expe rience and qualification requirements to ensure that they have sufficient knowledge and expertise. ACC also requires auditors to attend and pass accredited Responsible Care auditor courses that provide comprehensive instruction on the initiative and its requirements, including new security issues. Finally, each auditor participating in the process is required to be certified by RABQSA International (www.rabqsa.com) or the Board of Environment, Health and Safety Auditor Certifications (www.beac.org). Auditor certification requirements include passing a Responsible Care test administered by BEAC.
In an effort to reach out to local stakeholders and make RC14001 more transparent, ACC has strongly encouraged its members to include the local public in their auditing process. To date, several ACC companies have invited local residents to attend all or part of their RC14001 audit as observers. In several cases, auditors have requested and been given access to local chemical company-sponsored community advisory panels (CAPs) so that they could gather evidence on the organization's implementation of outreach requirements found in the RC14001. ACC members are also sharing the results of their audits with local stakeholders as another example of meeting public expectations for transparency.
Conclusion
The RC14001 technical specification is providing ACC member companies, Responsible Care partners and a growing number of companies outside the chemical industry with a powerful tool to drive performance improvement and integrate their management systems. Although still a relative newcomer to the list of established management systems models, RC14001 has attracted widespread interest from companies in the oil and gas, automotive supply, mining, and other business sectors both in the United States and overseas. By giving companies the opportunity to conduct a single audit covering a comprehensive set of requirements, business managers can respond to multiple internal and external stakeholder expectations while minimizing the need for competing management systems models.
About the author
Daniel Roczniak is the director of Responsible Care implementation
and performance at the American Chemistry Council in Arlington, Virginia, where he manages ACC's Responsible Care certification and mutual assistance programs.
QD

 http://dramarnathgiri.blogspot.in/search?q=MANAGEMENT+SYSTEMS+AT+NFCL

In 2013, the 25th anniversary of Responsible Care in the United States, ACC is launching an enhanced Responsible Care

$
0
0
For 25 Years...A History of Excellence
Since 1988, Responsible Care has helped American Chemistry Council (ACC) member companies significantly enhance their performance, discover new business opportunities, and improve employee safety, the health of the communities in which they operate and the environment as a whole, moving us toward a safer, more sustainable future.
In 2013, the 25th anniversary of Responsible Care in the United States, ACC is launching an enhanced Responsible Care that strengthens industry’s commitment to the safety of its products and manufacturing process, and includes new operational energy efficiency and performance measurements.
The Responsible Care Milestones Timeline highlights significant milestones in Responsible Care since it was enacted in Canada in 1984 and adopted in the United States in 1998.
A Commitment to Health, Safety and Security

Participation in Responsible Care is a condition of membership for ACC members and Responsible Care Partner companies, all of which have made CEO-level commitments to uphold the program elements. The Responsible Care Guiding Principles are at the heart of the Responsible Care commitment—through these principles, members and Partners pledge to improve EHS&S performance for facilities, processes and products throughout the entire operating system.
Companies also are committed to open and transparent reporting and submit annual data on their progress toward meeting performance measure goals. This information is made publicly available on this website.
Fast Facts:
  • Responsible Care is a global initiative that began in Canada in 1984 and is practiced today by 57 national and regional associations in 65 economies around the world.
  • The U.S. chemical industry invests more than $16 billion annually in environmental, health, safety and security programs.
  • Since 1974, the U.S. chemical industry as a whole has improved its energy efficiency by 54 percent.
  • Responsible Care companies have invested almost $13 billion to further enhance security at their facilities in the past decade.
  • Responsible Care companies are committed to worker safety. They are five times safer than the average of the U.S. manufacturing sector as a whole, and nearly three times as safe as the business of chemistry overall.
  • Responsible Care companies have reduced process safety incidents by 58 percent over the past 18 years.
  • From 1988 to 2011, Responsible Care companies have reduced hazardous releases to the air, land and water by more than 76 percent.

Responsible Care® Product Safety Code

$
0
0

Responsible Care® Product Safety Code


We enjoy healthier and longer lives, thanks, in part, to remarkable innovations in chemistry. From life-saving medical devices to airbags, from child safety seats to clean drinking water, chemistry is at the heart of making our lives better and safer.
As valuable as the products of chemistry are, they also must be used responsibly. The chemical industry is committed to the safe, responsible, sustainable management of chemicals through their life cycles and for their intended uses.
That’s why ACC and its members developed the Responsible Care Product Safety Code to drive continuous improvement in chemical product safety as part of the industry’s signature environmental, health, safety and security management system.
Responsible Care Product Safety Code
Core Elements of the Product Safety Code
The Product Safety Code includes a set of 11 Management Practices, through which chemical manufacturers can evaluate, demonstrate and continuously improve their product safety performance, while also making information about chemical products available to the public.
Specifically, the Product Safety Code Management Practices verify that chemical companies do the following:
  • Undertake scientific analyses of their products, and take steps to assure they can be used safely.
  • Enhance cooperation and communications along the chemical value chain, so that chemical producers and the manufacturers, distributors and retailers who use, handle or sell chemicals, work together to improve awareness about the safety and risks of certain chemicals, and how to manage chemicals safety along the value chain.
  • Consider impacts on public health, the environment and overall sustainability as they improve their products or develop new ones.
  • Determine whether the chemicals they make pose risks, based on any new research, how the chemical is used, and whether children and other sensitive groups come into contact with them.
  • Provide the public with access to product safety and stewardship information.
  • Ensure that company senior executives, including the CMD, commit to a culture of product safety and accountability.

HSE&S (HEALTH , SAFETY , ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY) IN CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

Responsible Care® Performance Measures

$
0
0

 Responsible Care companies commit to systematic, continuous improvement in process safety through applying the Code’s seven management practices, which address:

  • Leadership and culture
  • Accountability
  • Knowledge, expertise and training
  • Understanding and prioritization of process safety risks
  • Comprehensive process safety management system
  • Information sharing
  • Monitoring and improving performance

Responsible Care® Performance Measures

A pillar of the Responsible Care program is environmental, health, safety and security (EHS&S) performance monitoring and reporting, both for individual companies and the chemical industry overall.  
All ACC member companies are required to publicly report, through Responsible Care, specific performance measurements in the following areas: 
  • Environmental metrics, including hazardous air pollutants released, SOx and NOx emissions and net water consumption.
  • Energy metrics, including greenhouse gas emissions and energy efficiency.
  • Safety metrics, including number of process safety incidents, DOT-reportable distribution incidents, OHSA recordable lost workday incidence and fatalities.
  • Accountability metrics, including community outreach and emergency response initiatives.
Some of these metrics are reported on a company-by-company basis, while others are reported as aggregated industry statistics. This public reporting is meant to enhance transparency and accountability and drive performance of ACC member companies.  
ACC uses these reported metrics to openly demonstrate the commitment of ACC members and their partners along the supply chain to continuous improvements in the EHS&S performance of their operations and businesses. 
In addition, companies communicate their progress toward meeting and improving compliance with key performance measures to all of their stakeholders – including facility communities, employees, business partners and the general public.

Responsible Care® Security Code

$
0
0

Responsible Care® Security Code



Security is a top priority for America’s leading chemical producers. Responsible Care companies are leaders in chemical security and work closely with federal, state and local intelligence authorities to safeguard our communities.
After September 11, 2001, ACC members took the lead to enhance security against terrorism. Without waiting for government direction, the ACC Board of Directors adopted the Responsible Care Security Code to further enhance the security of our facilities, our communities and the essential products we produce.
The Responsible Care Security Code is recognized by local, state and federal governments as a model security program for chemical facilities and other U.S. industries. Through Responsible Care, ACC member companies have enhanced coordination, conducted training and safety drills, and shared important security information with local emergency response teams.
The Security Code predates federal security regulations and has served as a model for subsequent regulatory action under the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards program. In addition, through the SAFETY Act, DHS has recognized the Security Code as a Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology, which provides ACC members and Responsible Care Partners with certain liability protections in the event of a terrorist action at their facilities.
HOW THE RESPONSIBLE CARE SECURITY CODE WORKS
Under the Security Code’s 13 management practices – which address facility, cyber and transportation/value chain security – companies must conduct comprehensive security vulnerability assessments (SVAs) and implement security enhancements under a strict timeline, using methods approved by nationally recognized security experts.  Companies also must obtain independent verification to prove they have made required physical site security measures identified during the SVA.
Prioritization and Assessment of Sites
Companies initially prioritize their facilities according to a four-tier system based on vulnerability and then conduct SVAs at all facilities.
Implementation of Security Measures
After completing the SVA process, companies implement security enhancements to control or mitigate identified risks to facility, cyber and value chain security, based on the 13 management practices.
  • Protecting Information and Cyber-Security: Safeguarding information and process control systems is a critical component of sound security management and an essential part of the Security Code.

  • Training, Drills and Guidance: Emergency preparedness is a hallmark of the Responsible Care initiative. Training, drills and guidance enhance security awareness and capabilities across the business of chemistry.

  • Communications, Dialogue and Information Exchange: The Security Code emphasizes cooperation among chemical producers, customers, suppliers, and shippers and establishing and maintaining a constructive, consistent dialogue with government agencies.

  • Response to Security Threats and Incidents: Companies evaluate, respond, report and communicate security threats as appropriate and have a process in place to respond to incidents and take corrective action.

  • Continuous Improvement: The Security Code includes planning, establishing goals and objectives, monitoring progress and performance, analyzing trends, and developing and implementing corrective actions.

  • Independent Review: Facilities undergo independent audits by third-party individuals and organizations to assure that necessary security enhancements are in place.

IMPLEMENTING THE SECURITY CODE
ACC tracks members’ and Partners’ implementation of the Security Code and publicly discloses their performance:
  • In the last decade, Responsible Care companies have invested nearly $13 billion to enhance security at their facilities.

  • ACC members and Responsible Care Partners implement the Security Code at more than 1,550 facilities nationwide.

  • New members and Partners are required to implement the Security Code, conduct site security vulnerability assessments and make necessary security upgrades within three years of joining ACC.

  • Each Responsible Care company’s Security Code implementation status is subject to review as part of ACC’s mandatory third-party, Responsible Care Management Systems® certification process.

Security Code implementation is monitored by ACC and companies that do not meet specific deadlines are held accountable, at the senior executive level, by a Board-level Responsible Care governance process.

-Responsible Care® companies are committed to protecting and improving the environments in which they operate

$
0
0

Environment


Responsible Care® companies are committed to protecting and improving the environments in which they operate. All ACC member companies, through Responsible Care, publicly report on their progress in meeting environmental performance measurements in the following areas:
SOx/NOx
Water Consumption
Reducing Emissions

SOx / NOx
Protecting air quality is critical to public and environmental health. Nitrogen oxide (NOx) and sulphur oxide (SOx) are pollutants emitted by industrial and manufacturing facilities that can negatively affect air quality. As such, SOx and NOx emissions are identified as core environmental indicators. These emissions fall under Clean Air Act Title V permitting requirements, and ACC member companies have implemented a variety of measures to control their emissions.
Between 2008 and 2012, Responsible Care companies reduced SOx emissions by about 40 percent and reduced NOx emissions by about 22 percent.
View Graph

Water Consumption
Water consumption is a global issue – today 1.1 billion people around the world lack access to safe drinking water. The chemistry industry is working to protect water quality and minimize adverse impacts on this critical natural resource.
In 2008, ACC member companies began tracking water consumption, defined as the total amount of water brought onsite for use in manufacturing activities, to demonstrate their commitment to reduce water usage in their operations. In 2012, Responsible Care companies consumed about the same amount of water as in 2008, even with an increase in manufacturing.
View Graph
 

Reducing Emissions
Responsible Care companies have made significant progress in reducing hazardous emissions to the environment. Responsible Care companies measure emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) – chemicals identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) as known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects or adverse environmental effects.
Since 1988, Responsible Care companies have reduced all HAPs emissions by 76 percent. 
View Graph

Determination of Shelf Life of Solutions in Laboratory

$
0
0



Aug 29, 2013

Learn how to determine the shelf life of volumetric, reagents and buffer laboratory solutions.


Incorrect strength or concentration of volumetric solutions, reagents and buffer solutions can alter the results of analyzed products. Solutions prepared for chemical analysis are not stable for a longer period.
The molarities of these solutions may change after a period of time. Shelf life of the solution depends upon the nature of the compound and the solvent also. Therefore, it is necessary to validate the stability period of these solutions individually in which these have to consume. Validation of shelf life is a mandatory GLP and regulatory requirement. There are different ways to assign the shelf life of the solutions; following are the simplest methods for the same.


Volumetric Solutions:
Prepare the volumetric solution and allow standing. After 24 hours determine the molarity of solution in triplicate calculating the mean of the results and continue the determination at an interval of 3 days for 15 days. Determine the RSD of all 5 values. If RSD of all 5 values remains less than 1.0, shelf life of solution should be assigned 15 days otherwise RSD shall be calculated with first 4 values and shelf life should be assigned 12 days. It the RSD of first 4 values remains more than 1.0, RSD shell be calculated with first three values and shelf life of the solution should be assigned accordingly.

 
Reagent Solutions:
Reagents solutions, those are used in analysis as reactants and molarity is not calculated. These are validated on their performance. The Performance of these solutions is checked at an interval of 7 day for 1 month. Evaluate the performance of all 4 tests and assign the life accordingly.

Buffer Solutions:
Buffers are generally used for calibration of pH meters. pH of buffer solutions may change due to chemical degradation. The shelf life of buffer solutions must not be assigned more than 7 days.

Note: Solution should be stored under proper storage conditions otherwise results may alter giving improper shelf life. Validation data should be recorded and maintained for regulatory audits.

PM’s statement on the current economic situation in the country |

$
0
0
The movement of the exchange rate of the Rupee recently is a matter of concern to the government. The Rupee has depreciated sharply against the dollar since the last week of May. There are concerns, and justifiably so, of the impact this would have on our economy.

What triggered the sharp and sudden depreciation was the markets’ reaction to certain unexpected external developments. On May 22, 2013, the US central bank indicated that it would soon ‘taper’ its quantitative easing as the US economy was recovering. This led to a reversal of capital flows to emerging economies which are now sharply pulling down not just the Rupee, but also the Brazilian Real, the Turkish Lira, the Indonesian Rupiah, the South African Rand and many other currencies.

While global factors such as tensions over Syria and the prospect of U.S. Federal Reserve tapering its policy of quantitative easing have caused general weakness in emerging market currencies, the rupee has been especially hit because of our large current account deficit and some other domestic factors. We intend to act to reduce the current account deficit and bring about an improvement in the economy.

In 2010-11 and the years prior to it, our current account deficit was more modest and financing it was not difficult, even in the crisis year of 2008-09. Since then, there has been a deterioration, mainly on account of huge imports of gold, higher costs of crude oil imports and recently, of coal. On the export side, weak demand in our major markets has kept our exports from growing. Exports have been further hit by a collapse in iron ore exports. Taken together, these factors have made our current account deficit unsustainably large.

Clearly we need to reduce our appetite for gold, economise in the use of petroleum products and take steps to increase our exports.

We have taken measures to reduce the current account deficit. The Finance Minister has indicated that it will be below $ 70 billion this year, and we will take all possible steps to ensure that outcome. These are already showing results with a declining trade deficit in both June and July. The Government is confident that we will be able to lower our current account deficit to $70 billion. Our medium term objective is to reduce the current account deficit to 2.5% of our GDP. Our short term objective is to finance the current account deficit in an orderly fashion. We will make every effort to maintain a macro economic framework friendly to foreign capital inflows to enable orderly financing of the current account deficit.

Madam Speaker,

Coming back to the effects of the Rupee depreciation, we must realise that part of this depreciation was merely a needed adjustment. Inflation in India has been much higher than in advanced economies. Therefore, it is natural that there has to be a correction in the exchange rate to account for this difference. To some extent, depreciation can be good for the economy as this will help to increase our export competitiveness and discourage imports.

There are many sectors which are regaining competitiveness in export markets as a result of the fall in the exchange rate. Over the next few months, I expect the effects of this to be felt more strongly, both in exports and in the financial position of exporting sectors. This in itself would correct the current account deficit to some extent.

However, foreign exchange markets have a notorious history of overshooting. Unfortunately this is what is happening not only in relation to the Rupee but also other currencies.

The RBI and Government have taken a number of steps to stabilize the rupee. Some measures have given rise to doubts in some quarters that capital controls are on the horizon. I would like to assure the House and the world at large, that the Government is not contemplating any such measures. The last two decades have seen India grow as an open economy and we have benefitted from it. There is no question of reversing these policies just because there is some turbulence in capital and currency markets. The sudden decline in the exchange rate is certainly a shock, but we will address this through other measures, not through capital controls or by reversing the process of reforms. The Finance Minister has clarified this, and I take this opportunity to reaffirm our position.

Madam Speaker,

Ultimately, the value of the rupee is determined by the fundamentals of our economy. While we have taken a number of actions to strengthen those fundamentals, we intend to do more.

Growth has slowed down in recent quarters. I expect growth in the first quarter of 2013-14 to be relatively flat, but as the effects of the good monsoon kick in, I expect it to pick up.

There are many reasons for this optimism. The decisions of the Cabinet Committee on Investment in reviving stalled projects will start bearing fruit in the second half of the year. The full effect of the growth friendly measures that have been taken over the last six months, such as liberalizing norms for FDI, resolution of some tax issues of concern to industry and fuel subsidy reform will come into play over the year resulting in higher growth particularly in manufacturing. Exports are also starting to look up as the rest of the world is improving its growth. So I believe growth will pick up in the second half of the fiscal year barring extreme unforeseen eventualities.

There are questions about the size of the fiscal deficit. The government will do whatever is necessary to contain the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP this year. The most growth-friendly way to contain the deficit is to spend carefully, especially on subsidies that do not reach the poor, and we will take effective steps to that end.

Inflation measured by the Wholesale Price Index has been coming down, even though inflation measured by the Consumer Price Index is still too high. The depreciation of the rupee and rise in dollar prices of petroleum products will no doubt lead to some further upward pressure on prices. The RBI will therefore continue to focus on bringing down inflation. The favourable monsoon and the anticipated good harvest will help bring down food prices and ease the task of controlling inflation.

All in all, the macro-stabilization process which should support the value of the rupee is under way. I expect that as the fruits of our efforts materialize, currency markets will recover.

Madam Speaker,

Even while we go about doing what is necessary, it is important to recognize that the fundamentals of the Indian economy continue to be strong. India’s overall public-debt to GDP ratio has been on a declining trend from 73.2% of GDP in 2006-07 to 66% in 2012-13. Similarly, India’s external debt is only 21.2% of GDP and while short-term debt has risen, it stands at 5.2% of GDP. Our forex reserves stand at US$278bn, and are more than sufficient to meet India’s external financing requirements.

Many foreign analysts worry about banking problems in the wake of the currency crisis. The Indian banking sector has seen some rise in bad loans. The question that needs to be asked is whether there is a liquidity problem or a solvency problem for the borrowers. My belief is that there is a liquidity problem. Many of the projects are not unviable but only delayed, in contrast to the overbuilding that has characterized the banking sector problems in other countries. As these projects come on stream, they will generate revenue and repay loans. Our banks are fortunately well capitalized much above the Basel norms and have the capacity to provide for any non-performing assets until those assets are turned around.

Madam Speaker,

The easy reforms of the past have been done. We have the more difficult reforms to do such as reduction of subsidies, insurance and pension sector reforms, eliminating bureaucratic red tape and implementing Goods and Services Tax. These are not low hanging fruit and need political consensus.

It is here that I urge Members across the political spectrum to reflect on the need of the hour. Many laws that are necessary are held up for lack of political consensus. Reforms such as the Goods and Services Tax, which everyone agrees is essential to restore growth, require States to come to an agreement. We need to forge consensus on such vital issues. I urge political parties to work towards this end and to join in the government’s efforts to put the economy back on the path of stable and sustainable growth.

There may be short term shocks to our economy and we need to face them. That is the reality of a globalised economy, whose benefits we have reaped in the last 15 to 20 years.We will need to ensure that the fundamentals remain strong so that India continues to grow at a healthy rate for many years to come. That we will ensure. We are no doubt faced with challenges, but we have the capacity to address them. It is at times like these that the nation shows what it is truly capable of.

PM’s statement on the current economic situation in the country | http://pmindia.nic.in/speech-details.php?nodeid=1341  Madam Speaker and Hon’ble Members of this august House,  The movement of the exchange rate of the Rupee recently is a matter of concern to the government.  The Rupee has depreciated sharply against the dollar since the last week of May. There are concerns, and justifiably so, of the impact this would have on our economy.  What triggered the sharp and sudden depreciation was the markets’ reaction to certain unexpected external developments. On May 22, 2013, the US central bank indicated that it would soon ‘taper’ its quantitative easing as the US economy was recovering.  This led to a reversal of capital flows to emerging economies which are now sharply pulling down not just the Rupee, but also the Brazilian Real, the Turkish Lira, the Indonesian Rupiah, the South African Rand and many other currencies.  While global factors such as tensions over Syria and the prospect of U.S. Federal Reserve tapering its policy of quantitative easing have caused general weakness in emerging market currencies, the rupee has been especially hit because of our large current account deficit and some other domestic factors. We intend to act to reduce the current account deficit and bring about an improvement in the economy.  In 2010-11 and the years prior to it, our current account deficit was more modest and financing it was not difficult, even in the crisis year of 2008-09. Since then, there has been a deterioration, mainly on account of huge imports of gold, higher costs of crude oil imports and recently, of coal. On the export side, weak demand in our major markets has kept our exports from growing. Exports have been further hit by a collapse in iron ore exports. Taken together, these factors have made our current account deficit unsustainably large.  Clearly we need to reduce our appetite for gold, economise in the use of petroleum products and take steps to increase our exports.  We have taken measures to reduce the current account deficit. The Finance Minister has indicated that it will be below $ 70 billion this year, and we will take all possible steps to ensure that outcome. These are already showing results with a declining trade deficit in both June and July. The Government is confident that we will be able to lower our current account deficit to $70 billion. Our medium term objective is to reduce the current account deficit to 2.5% of our GDP.  Our short term objective is to finance the current account deficit in an orderly fashion.   We will make every effort to maintain a macro economic framework friendly to foreign capital inflows to enable orderly financing of the current account deficit.  Madam Speaker,  Coming back to the effects of the Rupee depreciation, we must realise that part of this depreciation was merely a needed adjustment. Inflation in India has been much higher than in advanced economies. Therefore, it is natural that there has to be a correction in the exchange rate to account for this difference. To some extent, depreciation can be good for the economy as this will help to increase our export competitiveness and discourage imports.  There are many sectors which are regaining competitiveness in export markets as a result of the fall in the exchange rate. Over the next few months, I expect the effects of this to be felt more strongly, both in exports and in the financial position of exporting sectors. This in itself would correct the current account deficit to some extent.  However, foreign exchange markets have a notorious history of overshooting.  Unfortunately this is what is happening not only in relation to the Rupee but also other currencies.  The RBI and Government have taken a number of steps to stabilize the rupee.  Some measures have given rise to doubts in some quarters that capital controls are on the horizon. I would like to assure the House and the world at large, that the Government is not contemplating any such measures. The last two decades have seen India grow as an open economy and we have benefitted from it. There is no question of reversing these policies just because there is some turbulence in capital and currency markets. The sudden decline in the exchange rate is certainly a shock, but we will address this through other measures, not through capital controls or by reversing the process of reforms. The Finance Minister has clarified this, and I take this opportunity to reaffirm our position.  Madam Speaker,  Ultimately, the value of the rupee is determined by the fundamentals of our economy. While we have taken a number of actions to strengthen those fundamentals, we intend to do more.  Growth has slowed down in recent quarters. I expect growth in the first quarter of 2013-14 to be relatively flat, but as the effects of the good monsoon kick in, I expect it to pick up.  There are many reasons for this optimism. The decisions of the Cabinet Committee on Investment in reviving stalled projects will start bearing fruit in the second half of the year.  The full effect of the growth friendly measures that have been taken over the last six months, such as liberalizing norms for FDI, resolution of some tax issues of concern to industry and fuel subsidy reform will come into play over the year resulting in higher growth particularly in manufacturing.  Exports are also starting to look up as the rest of the world is improving its growth. So I believe growth will pick up in the second half of the fiscal year barring extreme unforeseen eventualities.  There are questions about the size of the fiscal deficit. The government will do whatever is necessary to contain the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP this year.   The most growth-friendly way to contain the deficit is to spend carefully, especially on subsidies that do not reach the poor, and we will take effective steps to that end.  Inflation measured by the Wholesale Price Index has been coming down, even though inflation measured by the Consumer Price Index is still too high. The depreciation of the rupee and rise in dollar prices of petroleum products will no doubt lead to some further upward pressure on prices. The RBI will therefore continue to focus on bringing down inflation. The favourable monsoon and the anticipated good harvest will help bring down food prices and ease the task of controlling inflation.  All in all, the macro-stabilization process which should support the value of the rupee is under way. I expect that as the fruits of our efforts materialize, currency markets will recover.  Madam Speaker,  Even while we go about doing what is necessary, it is important to recognize that the fundamentals of the Indian economy continue to be strong.  India’s overall public-debt to GDP ratio has been on a declining trend from 73.2% of GDP in 2006-07 to 66% in 2012-13. Similarly, India’s external debt is only 21.2% of GDP and while short-term debt has risen, it stands at 5.2% of GDP.  Our forex reserves stand at US$278bn, and are more than sufficient to meet India’s external financing requirements.  Many foreign analysts worry about banking problems in the wake of the currency crisis. The Indian banking sector has seen some rise in bad loans. The question that needs to be asked is whether there is a liquidity problem or a solvency problem for the borrowers. My belief is that there is a liquidity problem. Many of the projects are not unviable but only delayed, in contrast to the overbuilding that has characterized the banking sector problems in other countries. As these projects come on stream, they will generate revenue and repay loans. Our banks are fortunately well capitalized much above the Basel norms and have the capacity to provide for any non-performing assets until those assets are turned around.  Madam Speaker,  The easy reforms of the past have been done. We have the more difficult reforms to do such as reduction of subsidies, insurance and pension sector  reforms, eliminating bureaucratic red tape and implementing Goods and Services Tax. These are not low hanging fruit and need political consensus.  It is here that I urge Members across the political spectrum to reflect on the need of the hour. Many laws that are necessary are held up for lack of political consensus. Reforms such as the Goods and Services Tax, which everyone agrees is essential to restore growth, require States to come to an agreement.  We need to forge consensus on such vital issues.   I urge political parties to work towards this end and to join in the government’s efforts to put the economy back on the path of stable and sustainable growth.  There may be short term shocks to our economy and we need to face them. That is the reality of a globalised economy, whose benefits we have reaped in the last 15 to 20 years.We will need to ensure that the fundamentals remain strong so that India continues to grow at a healthy rate for many years to come. That we will ensure. We are no doubt faced with challenges, but we have the capacity to address them. It is at times like these that the nation shows what it is truly capable of.

India Launches Its First Advanced Communication Satellite For Defence GSAT-7 Successfully

$
0
0
India Launches Its First Advanced Communication Satellite For Defence GSAT-7 Successfully

India's advanced multi-band communication satellite, GSAT-7, was successfully launched at 0200 hrs IST today (August 30, 2013) by the Ariane-5 launch vehicle of Arianespace from Kourou, French Guiana. Ariane-5 precisely placed GSAT-7 into the intended Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) after a flight of 34 minutes 25 seconds duration.

As planned, ISRO's Master Control Facility (MCF) at Hassan in Karnataka started acquiring the signals five minutes prior to the separation of GSAT-7 from Ariane-5 launch vehicle. The solar panels of the satellite have been deployed and they are generating power. Initial checks have indicated normal health of the satellite.

The present orbit of the satellite will be raised to Geostationary Orbit of about 36,000 km altitude through three orbit raising manoeuvres by firing of GSAT-7's Liquid Apogee Motor (LAM). Preparations are underway for the first firing, planned in the early hours of August 31, 2013. The satellite will be placed in the Geostationary Orbit by Sep 04, 2013. ( ISRO)

FACT SHEET: Executive Order on Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security

$
0
0

FACT SHEET: Executive Order on Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
August 01, 2013

 

Today, the President signed an Executive Order to improve the safety and security of chemical facilities and reduce the risks of hazardous chemicals to workers and communities.   Chemicals and the facilities that manufacture, store, distribute and use them are essential to our economy.  However, incidents such as the devastating explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas in April are tragic reminders that the handling and storage of chemicals present serious risks that must be addressed.  While the cause of the Texas explosion is under investigation, we can take some common sense steps now to improve safety and security and build on Federal agencies’ ongoing work to reduce the risks associated with hazardous chemicals.  
The Executive Order on Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security directs the Federal Government to:
  • improve operational coordination with state and local partners;
  • enhance Federal agency coordination and information sharing;
  • modernize policies, regulations and standards; and
  • work with stakeholders to identify best practices. 
Improving Operational Coordination with State and Local Partners
Federal, state, local, and tribal governments have different responsibilities in addressing risks associated with chemical facilities, including response planning for potential emergencies.  To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of risk management and response measures, the Executive Order charges Federal agencies with improving coordination and information sharing with state and local governments.  For example, the Executive Order requires Federal agencies to develop a plan within 90 days that identifies ways to ensure State homeland security advisors, State Emergency Response Commissions (SERCs), Tribal Emergency Response Commissions (TERCs), Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs), Tribal Emergency Planning Committees (TEPCs), State regulators, and first responders have ready access to key information in a useful format to prevent, prepare for, and respond to chemical incidents.
Enhancing Federal Coordination and Information Sharing
Programs designed to improve the safety and security of chemical facilities through regulations, information reporting requirements, site inspections, and voluntary partnerships are managed by multiple Federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Labor (DOL), and the Department of Justice (DOJ).  To improve the collective performance of these Federal programs, the Executive Order calls upon Federal agencies to initiate innovative approaches for working together on a broad range of activities, such as identification of high-risk facilities, inspections, enforcement, and incident investigation and follow up.  For example, the Executive Order requires that the Federal agencies deploy a regional pilot program that will validate best practices and test innovative new methods for Federal interagency collaboration on chemical facility safety and security.  Additionally, Federal agencies are specifically directed to modernize the collection and sharing of chemical facility information to maximize the effectiveness of risk reduction efforts and reduce duplicative efforts.
Modernizing Policies, Regulations and Standards
The Executive Order directs Federal agencies to work with stakeholders to improve chemical safety and security through agency programs, private sector initiatives, Federal guidance, standards, and regulations.  For example, to reduce risks associated with ammonium nitrate, agencies will examine new options to address the safe and secure storage, handling, and sale of this explosive chemical.  Agencies will also determine if additional chemicals should be covered by existing Federal regulatory programs, such as EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP), DHS’s Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATs), and DOL’s Process Safety Management Standards (PSM).  In addition, agencies will consider whether to pursue an independent, high-level assessment of the U.S. approach to chemical facility risk management to identify additional recommendations for all levels of government and industry to reduce the risk of catastrophic chemical incidents in the future.
Working with Stakeholders to Identify Best Practices
Many chemical facilities have taken steps to create safer work environments and reduce risks of chemical incidents to nearby communities. The Executive Order directs key Federal agencies to convene a wide range of interested stakeholders, including representatives from industry, state, local, and tribal governments, non-governmental organizations, and the first responder community, to identify and share successes to date and best practices to reduce safety and security risks in the production and storage of potentially harmful chemicals, including through the use of safer alternatives, adoption of best practices, and potential public-private partnerships.
Background on Federal Programs for Chemical Facility Safety and Security
Federal agencies implement a number of programs to help prevent chemical facility accidents, reduce risks of terrorist attacks on chemical facilities, protect chemical facility workers, collect and share relevant information with the public and decision makers, and prepare communities and local, tribal, and state first-responders to respond to potential large-scale accidents.  State,  local, and tribal authorities also have critical responsibilities in managing risks from chemical facility accidents through setting and enforcing requirements for zoning, siting, and emergency response and planning.  The primary Federal agencies and programs aimed at addressing chemical safety and security at chemical facilities[1] are summarized below:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP), established under the Clean Air Act, is aimed at reducing chemical risk at the local level.  EPA’s rules require owners and operators of a facility that manufactures, uses, stores, or otherwise handles certain listed flammable and toxic substances to develop a risk management program that includes hazard assessment (including an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental release scenarios), prevention mechanisms, and emergency response measures.  Facilities submit information regarding their risk management program (the information submitted is a "Risk Management Plan" or "RMP") to EPA.  RMP information helps local fire, police, and emergency response personnel prepare for and respond to chemical accidents, while allowing citizens to understand chemical hazards in their communities.  EPA has focused its chemical plant safety inspection and enforcement efforts on the highest risk facilities. 
  • EPA also implements the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), which was designed to promote emergency planning and preparedness at the state, local, and tribal levels.  EPCRA helps ensure local communities and first responders have needed information on potential chemical hazards within their communities in order to develop community emergency response plans.  Under EPCRA, facilities with Extremely Hazardous Chemicals must notify the State Emergency Response Commission or Tribal Emergency Response Committees (TERCs) and Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), as well as participate in local emergency planning activities. LEPCs and TERCs are then responsible for developing a community emergency response plan. 
Department of Labor/Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
  • OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) standard sets requirements for the management of highly hazardous substances to prevent and mitigate the catastrophic releases of flammable, explosive, reactive, and toxic chemicals that may endanger workers.  The PSM standard covers the manufacturing of explosives and processes involving threshold quantities of flammable liquids and flammable gasses, as well as 137 other highly hazardous chemicals.
  • In 2011, OSHA launched its Chemical Plant National Emphasis Program (NEP) to conduct focused inspections at randomly-selected facilities among worksites likely to have highly hazardous chemicals in quantities covered by the PSM standard.  Under this program, OSHA has corrected serious safety issues through approximately 350 inspections and the issuance of 1,325 violations.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD)
  • DHS/NPPD is responsible for implementing Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS), the Federal government’s primary regulatory authority for security of chemicals at stationary facilities.  CFATS is helping make the nation more secure by requiring high-risk chemical facilities to develop and implement security plans that meet eighteen risk-based performance standards established by the Department.  Additionally, since the program’s inception, more than 3,000 facilities have voluntarily removed or reduced the onsite quantity of chemicals of interest to the point that the facilities are no longer considered high-risk.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/United States Coast Guard (USCG)
  • The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) is responsible for maritime security under the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA), 46 U.S.C. § 70101, et seq., which includes authority over certain port facilities that use, store, or transport chemicals or engage in other chemical-related activities.
  • MTSA reinforces the national and global importance of security for the marine transportation system, and provides a crucial framework for ensuring the safety of maritime commerce and our domestic ports. MTSA's key requirement is to prevent a maritime transportation security incident (TSI) - defined as any incident that results in a significant loss of life, environmental damage, transportation system disruption, or economic disruptions to a particular area. Within the maritime venue, preventing TSI's has been a core mission of the Coast Guard since its beginning.
Department of Justice/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (DOJ/ATF)
  • ATF is responsible for enforcing federal explosives laws that govern commerce in explosives in the United States including licensing, storage, record keeping, and conduct of business.  ATF conducts inspections of federal explosives licensees who manufacture, import, sell or store explosives in the United States to ensure explosives are managed in accordance with federal law. In Fiscal Year 2012, ATF conducted 5,390 explosives inspections resulting in approximately 400 reports of violations.


[1] The Federal government also has a number of regulatory programs related to the safe and secure transportation of chemicals across all modes of transportation, including highway, rail, aviation, maritime, and pipeline.  This fact sheet is focused on chemical safety and security at fixed facilities and does not address the programs focused on the transportation of hazardous materials.

Dumping of Wastage in Yamuna Banks

$
0
0
Dumping of Wastage in Yamuna Banks An Application No. 06/2012 has been filed before Hon’ble National Green Tribunal (NGT) regarding removal of debris, solid wastes, construction material, etc, lying along the banks of river Yamuna. The NGT vide its order dated 22nd July 2013, has directed all concerned agencies to remove this debris by 15th August 2013. This was stated by Shrimati Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Environment and Forests, in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.

The Minister further stated that as per the information provided by the concerned agencies, Delhi Development Authority has removed 101,500 cubic metres (m3) of debris, Public Works Department and Irrigation & Flood Control Department of Delhi Government have removed 20,000 m3 of debris, Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department has removed 71,000 m3 of debris and Delhi Metro Rail Corporation has removed approximately 73,000 metric tonnes of construction & demolition waste from their jurisdiction.

The Minister further stated that the Ministry has issued Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 which stipulates that all development activities, including construction, which are listed in the said Notification requires necessary clearances under the Notification. Violation of the notification attracts punitive action under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Under the provision of EIA Notification, 2006, environmental clearance for building & construction and township & area development projects are appraised by the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEACs) and approved by the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). Further, State Governments issue Notifications/Notices from time to time to not take up construction on the river flood plain, the Minister added.

RM/RS- USQ2028 - RS
(Release ID :98861)

Policy for Recycling Computer Waste

$
0
0
Policy for Recycling Computer Waste
As per the available information, UNEP has come out with a report during the year 2009 entitled, “Recycling- From E-waste to Resources”. In section 3.2.1.1 of this report there is reference of e-waste generated from personal computers in terms of per capita per year. India with generation of less than 0.15 kg/capita/year of e-waste has been shown to be amongst countries with lowest quantity of per capita e-waste from personal computers. . This was stated by Shrimati Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Environment and Forests, in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.

The Minister further stated that the Ministry of Environment and Forest, has already notified E-Waste Rules in May 2011, which have come into force with effect from 1st May 2012. The concept of Extended Producers Responsibility (EPR) has been enshrined in these rules. As per these Rules, the producers are required to collect e-waste generated from the end of life of their products by setting up collections centers or take back systems either individually or collectively. E-waste recycling can be undertaken only in facilities authorized and registered with State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committee (PCCs). Wastes generated are required to be sold to a registered or authorized recycler or re-processor having environmentally sound facilities. The rules have provision for setting up of Collection Centre individually or jointly; or by a registered society or a designated agency; or by an association to collect e-waste, the Minister added.

RM/RS- USQ2034 - RS
(Release ID :98862)

Decision Regarding Reducing of Carbon Emission

$
0
0
Decision Regarding Reducing of Carbon Emission
Government of India has announced that it would reduce emissions intensity of its Gross Domestic Product by 20-25% from 2005 level by 2020 in December, 2009. As per the interim report on ‘Low Carbon Strategy for Inclusive Growth’ prepared by the Expert Group set up by the Planning Commission, twelve focus areas have been identified for 12th Five Year Plan. These areas are Advanced Coal Technologies, National Wind Energy Mission, National Solar Mission, Technology Improvement in Iron and Steel Industry, Technology Improvement in Cement Industry, Energy Efficiency Programmes in the Industry, Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Programme, Improving the Efficiency of Freight Transport, Better Urban Public and Non-motorized Transport, Lighting, Labelling and Super-efficient Equipment Programme, Faster Adoption of Green Building Codes and Improving the Stock of Forest and Tree Cover. No measurement has been made to know the status of carbon emissions in these areas. This was stated by Shrimati Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Environment and Forests, in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.

RM/RS- USQ2039 - RS
(Release ID :98865)

Loss of Environmental Degradation

$
0
0
Loss of Environmental Degradation
The World Bank has submitted the Report titled ‘India Diagnostic Assessment of Select Environmental Challenges’ to the Government of India. The report states inter-alia, “The report estimates the total cost of environmental degradation in India at about Rs.3.75 trillion (US$80 billion) annually”. The Report is being examined by the Government. This was stated by Shrimati Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Environment and Forests, in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.

The Minister further stated that poor water supply is not a direct cause of deaths in children. However, drinking of unsafe water is responsible for water-borne diseases which can cause morbidity and mortality in children. As per WHO estimates, 11% of Child mortality in the age group of 0-5 years in India is due to Diarrhoeal disease.

The Minister further stated that the Government of India provides financial and technical assistance to States under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) to supplement their efforts to provide adequate safe drinking water to the rural population. A budgetary allocation of Rs. 11,000 crores has been provided for NRDWP in 2013-14. Under NRDWP, the Government of India has given priority to cover partially covered and quality affected habitations with safe drinking water. Up to 67% of the allocations made to States under NRDWP can be utilized for coverage of partially covered and quality affected habitations. 5% of NRDWP allocation is earmarked for allocation to those States facing problems of chemical contamination in drinking water or with Japanese Encephalitis and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome affected high priority districts, the Minister added.

RM/RS- USQ2046-RS
(Release ID :98866)

Revival of FCI's Talcher Fertilizer Factory

$
0
0
Revival of FCI's Talcher Fertilizer Factory
The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) had in August, 2011 approved the Draft Rehabilitation Scheme (DRS) for revival of all the Units of FCIL, including Talcher Fertilizer Plant. DRS envisaged revival of Talcher Unit by the consortium of M/s. Rashtriya Chemical & Fertilizers Limited (RCF), M/s Coal India Limited (CIL) and M/s Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL). Recently, CCEA in its meeting held on 9.5.2013, inter-alia, approved waiver of Government of India loan and interest of Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited (FCIL) to facilitate FCIL to arrive at positive net worth. This enabled FCIL to get de-registered from the purview of Board For Industrial and Financial reconstruction (BIFR). Talcher project involves setting up 3850 MTPD Urea plant and 1000MTPD of Ammonium Nitrate plant with an estimated cost of Rs. 9000 core. No time schedule has been fixed as yet, however, it takes normally around three years to fully operationalise a urea plant from its zero date.

This information was given by the Minister of State for Chemicals and Fertilisers, Shri Srikant Kumar Jena in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha today.


***

National Policy on Fertilizers

$
0
0
National Policy on Fertilizers

Urea is the only fertilizer under statutory price control and its import to bridge the gap between assessed demand and estimated indigenous production is made on Government account. The Government has notified the New Investment Policy 2012 on 2nd January, 2013 to facilitate fresh investment in urea sector and to reduce India’s import dependency. In response to New Investment Policy, 2012 the Department of Fertilizers have received 14 proposals, the details of which is as under:



S. No.
Units
State

1
Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.(NFCL)-III, Kakinada
Andhra Pradesh
2
Indo Gulf,Jagdishpur- II
Uttar Pradesh
3
Indian Farmers Fertilizer Coop. Ltd. (IFFCO)- Kalol-II
Gujarat
4
Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. (CFCL), Gadepan-III
Rajasthan
5
KrishakBharati Cooperative Limited (KRIBHCO) Hazira-II
Gujarat
6
Tata Chemicals Limited (TCL) Babrala-II
Uttar Pradesh
7
Gujarat State Fertilizers Co.Ltd.(GSFC)
Gujarat
8
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co.Ltd (GNFC)
Gujarat
9
Matix-II
West Bengal
10
Kanpur Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited (KFCL)-II
Uttar Pradesh
11
KRIBHCO Shyam Fertilizers Limited (KSFL)
Uttar Pradesh
12
Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers (RCF)Thal-III
Maharashtra
13
Fertilizers and Chemical Travancore Limited (FACT)
Kerala
14
EPC- Sriram
Odisha






The P&K fertilizers like DAP, various grades of complex fertilisers and SSP etc. are being produced in the country, however country is almost dependent on imports by way of imports of raw materials/intermediates or by way of imports of finished Phosphatic fertilizers. Government has taken initiatives to encourage indigenous production in P&K sector by reducing the custom duty on phosphoric acid to enable indigenous manufacturers of P&K fertilizers to procure this important input at reasonable price. Government is also encouraging private sector and public sector companies to explore the possibilities for joint ventures abroad to ensure uninterrupted supply of fertilizer inputs to P&K sector. There are no exploitable reserves of potash in the country and the country is fully dependent on its import to meet the demand of potassicfertilizers.


This information was given by the Minister of State for Chemicals and Fertilisers, ShriSrikant Kumar Jena in a written reply in the LokSabhatoday.

***
DNM/NSK/DB

(Release ID :98764)

Policy for Import of Fertilizers

$
0
0



Import of urea in the country is restricted and permitted through three State Trading Enterprises i.e. MMTC Limited, State Trading Corporation of India Limited and Indian Potash Limited.  Import of all other fertilisersis free and importers are importing these fertilizers under Open General License (OGL) as per their requirements.
 
The P&K fertiliserslike DAP, various grades of complex fertilisers and SSP etc. are being produced in the country, howevercountry is almost dependent on imports by way of imports of raw materials/intermediates or by way of imports of finished Phosphaticfertilizers. There are no exploitable reserves of potash in the country and the country is fully dependent on its import to meet the demand of Potassicfertilisers. The details of P&K fertilizers imported during the last three years are as under:-

Fig in LMT
           Product
Year
DAP
MAP
TSP
NPK
MOP (Agri)
2010-11
74.11
1.88
0.98
9.81
45.00
2011-12
69.05
4.94
1.60
36.73
26.94
2012-13
57.02
1.52
0.00
4.05
18.80

The sales of P&K fertilisersin the country have dropped during the year 2012-13 as compared to the year 2011-12. The details are as under:-

Product
2011-12
2012-13
DAP
111.95
92.22
MOP
29.92
21.34
NPK
113.94
77.29
Total (in Lakh MT)
255.81
190.85

          The name of the companies who imported Potassic& Phosphatic(P&K) fertilizers during last three years and the current year are Agrigold Organics Pvt. Ltd, Coromandel International Limited, Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Ltd., Foliage, Green Star Fertilizer Ltd., Madras Fertilizers Limited, Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., Indian potash Limited, Gujarat State Fertilizer & Chemicals Ltd., HPM Chemicals & Fertilizes, Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Ltd., Indo Gulf  Fertilizers Ltd, Mosaic India (P) Ltd., Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, ParadipPhosphate Ltd., Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd., SunfertInternational Pvt. Ltd, Tata Chemicals Ltd., KPR FertilisersLtd., Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd., ShriramFertilizers, Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., National Fertilizers Limited, KrishakBharati Cooperative Ltd., ZuariHoldings Limited. 

          The countries from where the P&K fertilizers have been imported during the last three years and current year are Australia, Bahrain, Belarus, China, Canada, CIS, Estonia, Germany, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Korea, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Morocco, Philippines, Russia, S. Arabia, S. Africa, Singapore, Spain, Turkey, Tunisia, USA  Ukraine and Vietnam.

          Government has taken initiatives to encourage indigenous production in P&K sector by reducing the custom duty on phosphoric acid to enable indigenous manufacturers of P&K fertilizers to procure this important input at reasonable price. The Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme has also been announced on P&K fertilizers w.e.f.01.04.2010 to ensure subsidy on indigenous P&K fertilizers at par with imported P&K fertilizers. Government is also encouraging private sector and public sector companies to explore the possibilities for joint ventures abroad to ensure uninterrupted supply of fertilizer inputs to P&K sector.

This information was given by the Minister of State for Chemicals and Fertilisers, Shri Srikant Kumar Jena in a written reply in the Lok Sabha today.

***
DNM/NSK/DB

(Release ID :98767)

ISO 14001 Environments Aspect - Impact

Viewing all 8075 articles
Browse latest View live