Quantcast
Channel: EHSQLaw Greenko -AMGreen Group (Env-Energy,Health,Safety,Security ,Social Ac.Quality-Lab) Tech.Serv.
Viewing all 10191 articles
Browse latest View live

Regeneration methods for ion exchange units

$
0
0

Regeneration methods
for ion exchange units

Introduction

Most ion exchange resins are used in columns. Ion exchange operation is basically discontinuous: a loading phase, called service run, is followed by regeneration of the exhausted resins. There are two main methods for the regeneration process:
  • Co-flow regeneration, where the fluids are flowing from the top to the bottom of the column both during the service run as well as during regeneration.
  • Reverse flow regeneration, where the fluids are flowing alternatively upwards and downwards during service and regeneration.
We will also give information about MB regeneration, regenerant quantities (regeneration ratio), thoroughfare regeneration, and regenerant types and concentrations. Separate pages give information about the water quality required for regeneration, and regenerant neutralisation.

Co-flow regeneration (CFR)

This regeneration technique has been used used at the beginning of ion exchange: the solution to treat flows from the top to the bottom of the column, and the regenerant uses the same path.
The problem is that strongly acidic and strongly basic resins are not completely converted to the H or OH form at the end of the regeneration, because this would require too large an excess of chemical regenerant. As a result, the bottom layers of the resin bed are more contaminated than the top layers at the end of regeneration, so that when the next loading run begins the leakage is high due to the displacement of the contaminating ions by the H+ (or OH) ions produced in the exchange.
Co-flow regen. sequence
Degree of regenerationThe dark zone in the picture above represents the proportion of exhausted resin, the yellow zone the proportion of regenerated resin. The small picture on the right explains what I mean: for instance, at level A, the resin is 50% exhausted and 50% regenerated. Above the exchange zone, the resin is fully exhausted, and below it is fullly regenerated.
With co-flow regeneration, the only way to reduce this permanent leakage is to increase the quantity of regenerant so as to leave less contaminating ions at the outlet of the column.

Reverse flow regeneration (RFR)

This is also called "counterflow regeneraton". In the past, it was called counter-current regeneration, but the term is not strictly correct as the resin bed does not move. With reverse flow regeneration the regenerant is injected in the opposite direction of the service flow. There are two sub-cases:
  1. Upflow loading and downflow regeneration, as in the floating bed and AmberpackTM processes.
  2. Downflow loading and upflow regeneration, as in the UFDTM and UpcoreTM processes.
In this case, the regenerant doesn't have to push the contaminating ions through the whole resin bed. The layers which are less exhausted will be regenerated first and will be the cleanest when the next loading run (exhaustion) starts.
RFR
Or with upflow loading:
RFR2
Reverse flow regeneration offers two significant advantages:
  1. The treated water has a much higher purity than with co-flow, due to a very low leakage.
  2. Less regenerant is required, as the contaminating ions don't have to be pushed through the whole bed, and the leakage is almost independent of the regenerant dosage.

Treated water quality

Leakage profiles
At the end of regeneration, the exit layer of the column regenerated in CFR has the highest concentration of impurities, whereas in RFR the exit layer contains the most highly regenerated resin. This is why in CFR the contaminants at the bottom find their way into the treated water, more at the beginning than in the middle of the run, due to a "self regeneration" effect, whereas in RFR any displaced contaminant from the inlet layer gets immediately removed from a layer underneath.
The graph shows the typical leakage profile during the loading phase (e.g. conductivity in µS/cm but it can be any other leakage depending on the process). The ionic leakage obtained with reverse flow regeneration is usually so low, that it does not depend on the amount of regenerant used. With co-flow, low leakage values are obtained only with high regenerant dosage.

No backwash with RFR

The whole effect of reverse flow regeneration relies on undisturbed resin layers. The resin with the highest degree of regeneration should always be at the column outlet. Therefore, the resin bed should not be backwashed before regeneration, and should not be allowed to fluidise at any time. So either the columns are completely filled with resin (packed beds) or the bed is held down during regeneration. See the "column design" page for the concepts of holddown and packed beds.

Regeneration steps

The general regeneration procedure for ion echange vessels is as follows:
  1. Backwash resin bed (co-flow regeneration only) to remove suspended solids and decompact the bed.
  2. Inject regenerant diluted in appropriate water quality. The injection is at a low flow rate, so that the contact time is 20 to 40 minutes.
  3. Displace the regenerant with dilution water at the same flow rate.
  4. Rinse the bed at service flow rate with feed water until the desired treated water quality is obtained.
The above is valid for most ion exchange columns, e.g. softening, nitrate removal, de-alkalisation. For demineralisation, the cation column is regenerated first with acid, then the anion column with caustic soda; alternatively, both are regenerated at the same time. .

Mixed bed regeneration

MB regenerationInternal regeneration of a mixed bed unit is more complicated. The steps are:
  1. Backwash resin bed to separate the cation from the anion resin.
  2. Let the resins settle.
  3. Optionally: drain the water down to the resin bed surface.
  4. Inject caustic soda diluted in demineralised water.
  5. Displace the caustic with dilution water.
  6. Inject acid diluted in demineralised water.
  7. Displace the acid with dilution water.
  8. Drain the water down to the resin bed surface.
  9. Mix the resins with clean compressed air or nitrogen.
  10. Refill the unit slowly with water.
  11. Do the final rinse with feed water at service flow rate until the desired treated water quality is obtained.
Note 1: If no NaOH distributor is available, caustic "rains" from the top of the column down to the water level. This creates some dilution and the distribution is not as even as with a dedicated distributor.
Note 2: Cation and anion resin can be regenerated simultaneously to save time. Otherwise, always start with the anion resin.
Note 3: In condensate polishing, mixed bed units are usually regenerated externally.

Regeneration efficiency

HCl regeneration
H2SO4 regeneration
NaOH regeneration

The three pictures on the left show the conversion of totally exhausted resins (in the Na+ or Cl form), as a function of regenerant dosage. The y axis "% Regeneration" represents the percentage of conversion of the resins to the H+ and OH form respectively. We can observe the following things:
  1. Hydrochloric acid is more efficient than sulphuric acid to regenerate a strongly acidic cation exchange resin (SAC) initially in the Na+ form.
    With 50 g HCl per litre of resin, a conversion of 60 % to the H+ form is achieved.
    With 50 g H2SO4, a conversion of only 40 % is achieved.
  2. Even expressed as equivalents, hydrochloric acid is more efficient: 36.5 g HCl (1 eq) will convert the resin to 45 %, whereas 49 g H2SO4 (1 eq) convert only 39 %.
  3. To obtain total conversion, i.e. 100 % in the H+ form, we need about 6.5 eq HCl (240 g/L) but 8 eq H2SO4 (400 g/L).
  4. This is due to the fact that the second acidity of sulphuric acid is considerably weaker than the first acidity.
  5. Regeneration of a strongly basic anion exchange resin (SBA) initially in the Cl form with caustic soda is more difficult:
    With 50 g NaOH per litre, only 37 % of the resin are converted; with 40 g (1 eq) only 32 %.
    As much as 37.5 eq NaOH (1500 g) are required to convert the SBA resin to about 100 % in OH form.
  6. The reason why SBA resins of type 1 are more difficult to regenerate than SAC resins is the selectivity coefficient:
    K(Cl/OH) = 22 whilst K(Na/H) = 1.7.
In practice, SAC and SBA resins are not regenerated to a high conversion level, which would be uneconomical in view of the high regenerant consumption. On the other hand, weakly functional resins (WAC and WBA) have a near-linear regeneration curve: the can be regenerated with a dosage close to the stoichiometric value, so they are fully converted (see below) at the end of each regeneration.
Note: all regenerant values are expressed as grams of pure chemical (100 %) per litre of resin.

Regeneration ratio

Definition:
Definition of regeneration ratio
Introduction
  • The regeneration ratio — or regenerant ratio — is calculated as the total amount of regenerant (in equivalents) divided by the total ionic load (also in equivalents) during one cycle.
  • It is is also equal to the number of eq/L regenerant per eq/L of resin operating capacity.
  • A (theoretical) regenerant ratio of 1.00 (i.e. 100 %) would correspond to the stoichiometric quantity.
  • All resins need a certain excess of regenerant above the stoichiometric quantity.
Example
  • Amberjet 1000
  • regenerated with 55 g HCl per litre
  • operating capacity : 1.20 eq/L
  • 55 g/L HCl = 55/36.5 = 1.507 eq/L
  • Regenerant ratio = 1.507/1.20 = 1.26 = 126 %
Excess
The difference between ionic load and regenerant quantity is called excess regenerant.
Excess [in eq]= regenerant [eq] - ionic load [eq]

Excess [in %] = 100 x (regenerant ratio – 1)
Minimum values
  • WAC resins require just above the stoichiometric quantity. A safe number is 105 to 110 %.
  • WBA resins require 115 to 140 %, because most of them they have some strongly basic functional groups.
  • When regenerated with ammonia or sodium carbonate, WBA resins require a regenerant ratio of 150 to 200 %. These regenerants can be used for WBA only, not for SBA resins.
  • SAC and SBA resins require a larger excess than their weak counterparts.
  • Co-flow regenerated SAC and SBA resins require more than those regenerated in reverse flow.
  • SAC resins regenerated in reverse flow with hydrochloric acid need an absolute minimum of 110 % regeneration, but a safer value is 120 %. If the water contains high hardness or low alkalinity, the minimum value must be increased.
  • SAC resins regenerated with sulphuric acid require a larger excess than those regenerated with HCl. At least 40 % more.
  • For SBA resins, there is no easy way to estimate a minimum, as it depends on the type of SBA resin (styrenic type 1 vs type 2 or acrylic resins).
  • Important note: when calculating the regenerant ratio for SBA resins, one must take 2 equivalents of NaOH for each equivalent of CO2 or SiO2.
  • WAC/SAC couples can be regenerated with a global ratio of about 105 %.
  • WBA/SBA couples can be regenerated with a global ratio of 110 to 120 %. More is required if the silica level is high in the feed water.
  • The regenerant ratio for silica should be at least 800 %. This should be calculated separately as the quantity of NaOH (in eq) divided by the load of silica (in eq) during one cycle. One equivalent of silica is taken as 60 g as SiO2.

Thoroughfare regeneration

When a weak and a strong resin are used in series, the following two rules must apply:
  1. The feed water must pass first through the weak, then only through the strong resin.
  2. The regenerant must pass first through the strong, then through the weak resin.

Separate columns in service
 
Separate columns in regeneration
Why is it so?
  1. The weak resin has a high capacity and good regeneration efficiency, but does not remove all ions. Therefore it must be placed first, and the strong resin will be used to remove whatever the weak resin has not removed, albeit with a lower efficiency.
  2. The strong resin requires a high excess of regenerant. The weak resin requires almost no excess. Therefore the regenerant passes through the strong resin first, and the weak resin is regenerated with the excess regenerant coming out of the strong resin.
The above pictures are for old-fashioned, separate columns with co-flow regeneration. Below the same for an Amberpack double compartment column.

Amberpack in service
 
Amberpack in regeneration
All the above applies equally to a couple of weak acid and strong acid cation exchange resins.

Regenerant types and concentrations

Types of regenerant
  • Sodium chloride (NaCl) is normally used to regenerate SAC resins in the softening process, and SBA resins used for nitrate removal.
  • For softening, potassium chloride (KCl) can also be used when the presence of sodium in the treated solution is undesirable.
  • In some hot condensate softening processes, ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) can be used.
  • For nitrate removal, the SBA resin can be regenerated with other compounds providing chloride ions, such as hydrochloric acid (HCl).
  • For decationisation — the first step of a demineralisation process — SAC resins must be regenerated with a strong acid. The most common acids are hydrochloric and sulphuric acids.
    • Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is very efficient and does not cause precipitations in the resin bed.
    • Sulphuric acid (H2SO4) is sometimes cheaper and easier to store and to handle in general, but less efficient than hydrochloric acid: the operating capacity of the SAC resin is lower. Additionally, its concentration must be carefully adjusted to prevent calcium sulphate precipitation (see below). Once a CaSO4 precipitate is formed, it is very difficult to remove from the resin bed.
    • Nitric acid (HNO3) can also be used in principle, but is not recommended as it can cause exothermic reactions; explosions have been observed in some cases, so that the use of nitric acid is considered dangerous.
  • For dealkalisation, the WAC resin is best regenerated with hydrochloric acid (HCl). When using sulphuric acid, the concentration must be kept under 0.8 % to avoid calcium sulphate precipitation. Other, weaker acids can also regenerate WAC resins, such as acetic acid (CH3COOH) or citric acid, a molecule containing three —COOH groups: (CH2COOH-C(OH)COOH-CH2COOH = C6H8O7). Have a look at the 3-dimensional formula.
  • SBA resins are always regenerated with caustic soda (NaOH) in the demineralisation process. Caustic potash (potassium hydroxide KOH) is in principle also applicable, but usually more expensive.
  • WBA resins are usually also regenerated with caustic soda, but other regenerants— weaker alkalis — can also be used, such as:
    • Ammonia (NH3)
    • Sodium carbonate (soda ash, Na2CO3)
    • A lime (calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2) suspension
In general, WAC resins can be regenerated with an acid having a pKa lower than that of the resin itself. The pKa value of most WAC resins is 4.4 to 4.8. Thus acetic acid (pK 4.8) can just regenerate WAC resins, and citric acid (pK 3.1) is efficient for this purpose, whilst carbonic acid (pK 6.4) is not. In most cases, however, HCl or H2SO4, usually cheaper, are used. In general, WBA resins can be regenerated with an alkali having a pKa higher than that of the resin itself. The pKa value of styrenic WBA resins is around 8.5, that of acrylic WBAs is around 9.5. Thus ammonia, with a pKa of 9.3, can regenerate styrenic WBA resins. In most cases, however, NaOH is used, being often cheaper and easier to handle.
SAC and SBA resins can only be regenerated with strong acids or strong bases respectively.
Concentrations
The most usual concentrations are:
  • NaCl (softening and nitrate removal): 10 %
  • HCl (decationisation, de-alkalisation and demineralisation): 5 %
  • NaOH (demineralisation): 4 %
  • H2SO4: for SAC resins, the acid concentration must be carefully selected between 0.7 and 6 % as a function of the proportion of calcium in the feed water (which is the same in the SAC resin). For WAC resins, the concentration is usually 0.7 %. Too high a concentration may cause calcium sulphate precipitation.
    For SAC resins, stepwise concentrations are often used: after a first step at a low concentration, a second step is carried out at a higher concentration once a great part of the calcium on the resin has been eluted. In rare cases, three steps are used. The steps at higher concentrations reduce the quantity of dilution water and increase the sulphuric acid efficiency.
There are cases where different concentrations (often lower, rarely higher) must be selected.

Special applications

Sweetening-off and -on
In several applications other than water treatment, the solution treated by resins must be displaced before regeneration, to recover as much treated solution as possible, avoiding losses in the regeneration waste. This additional step is called "sweetening off" because it was first introduced in sugar treatment processes. Similarly, a "sweetening on" step is carried out after regeneration and rinse before feeding the raw solution to be treated, to avoid dilution of the treated solution. The complete regeneration process consists then of the following steps:
  1. Backwash with the raw solution (optional)
  2. Sweetening off: displacement of the solution with water
  3. Regenerant injection
  4. Displacement of the regenerant with water
  5. Fast rinse with water
  6. Sweetening on with the solution to be treated
The sweetening-off fraction is sometimes recycled, particularly when the solution contains valuable components (precious metals, expensive chemical compounds). When the solution has a high density, which can be higher than the resin, the service run — which often takes place at a low flow rate — can be carried out upflow to pack the resin bed and thus avoid its floating and fluidisation. This procedure is often used in the treatment of sugar solutions.
Merry-go-round
CarrouselTo increase the concentration of the eluate and the operating capacity of the resin, a system consisting of at least three columns can be used, where two columns are in service, in series, and the third in regeneration, as shown in the picture on the left. The "lead" column is exhausted past its leakage breakthrough, whilst the "lag" column acts as a polisher and guarantees a low leakage in the treated solution.
When the eluate contains a valuable compound removed on the resin, this compound is eluted at a higher concentration than with a single column.

Ion exchange columns

$
0
0

Ion exchange columns


Introduction

Ion exchange resins are used in columns, in principle similar to those used for sand filters or activated carbon. These are pressure vessels, usually made of rubber-lined steel. Small units are made of fiberglass reinforced plastic, and units used in the food industry are often made of stainless steel. A typical ion exchange column with co-flow regeneration is represented below:
CFR column
Co-flow regenerated column
Some explanations about the details shown in the picture:
  • The water enters from the top of the column. So as not to disturb the surface of the resin bed, the incoming water stream is stopped by a simple jet breaker.
  • The column has a large freeboard, usually about the same height as the resin bed, so that the resin can be backwashed inside the column to remove suspended solids accumulated on the bed surface.
  • A manhole (shown on the left side) is necessary to inspect and possibly repair the column inside.
  • Two sight glasses are also shown, one at the top, one at the level of the resin bed surface.
  • An air vent is also necessary at the top, to empty the column by draining the water out for inspection or a resin change.
  • One of the most important features of the vessel is the collector at the bottom: nowadays, one of the most popular types of collector is a plate with densely distributed nozzles .
  • The reinforced plate disk of steel onto which the nozzles are screwed.
  • It is supported by poles or L-shaped beams (here two poles are visible).
  • A regenerant distributor is sometimes — but not always — mounted in the middle of the vessel to ensure a uniform distribution of the regenerant. In absence of such a collector, the regenerant is introduced from the top of the column, which results in some dilution of the chemicals.
Most of the features of the above column (vent, sight glasses, nozzle plates, manhole) are common to many types of column, regenerated in co-flow or in reverse flow. You will find here the most common vessel designs used in water treatment, including:
  • Columns with freeboard
    • Co-flow regenerated vessels
    • Reverse flow regeneration with air hold-down
    • Reverse flow regeneration with water hold-down
    • Stratabed columns
    • Split-flow columns
  • Packed bed columns
    • AmberpackTM and floating beds
    • Multi-compartment Amberpack
    • UpcoreTM (Amberpack Reverse)
    • StratapackTM
  • Some other technologies
    • EconexTM (Italba)
    • ReCoFlowTM (Ecotec)
    • ISEPTM (Calgon Carbon)
  • Polishers
    • Mixed bed units
    • TriobedTM
    • Amberpack SandwichTM
    • MultistepTM (Bayer)
    • TripolTM (Vivendi/Permutit)


Columns with freeboard

The main advantage of having a freeboard in the vessel is to allow for resin backwash. This is useful when the feed water contains suspended matter. The disadvantage of columns with freeboard is wasted space, and complicated or fragile internals.
Co-flow regenerated vessels
See the picture at the top of the page. Co-flow columns are exhausted from top to bottom and regenerated from top to bottom as well.
The freeboard provides space for backwashing the resin bed, when required.
Reverse flow regenerated vessels with hold-down
See the page about regeneration methods. Reverse flow regenerated (RFR) vessels with freeboard are similar in concept to co-flow regenerated (CFR) units, except for a regenerant collector at the top of the resin bed. They are exhausted downflow and regenerated upflow. The bed must be kept compacted and must not fluidise during regeneration. For this reason, the regenerant cannot be removed from the top or the column but must be extracted through a collector just above the resin bed. The two main types of columns with hold-down technology are compacted with air or water. As the bed must be kept compact during regeneration, extra resin is required to cover the collector. This can be inert or inactive resin (see below).
In the following pictures, some details have been omitted, such as sight glasses, valves, vents, and manholes. Thes are essentially the same as those shown in the co-flow picture at the top of this page.
Vessels with air hold-down
In production
RFR
In regeneration
RFR
The picture above shows the basic design in production and in regeneration. The vessel is similar to a co-flow regenerated unit. An inert granular material pushes the bed down during regeneration, under air compression. The inert material is usually polypropylene, which floats when the upper part of the vessel is filled with water, and comes down when it is full of air. It is important that the resin bed itself doesn't get dry, so the inert resin prevents contact between the air and the active resin.
Instead of pushing air into the unit (whereby the compressed air is often warm), you can also suck the liquid using a hydro-ejector. In this case, as the tendency of dehydrating the resin is lower, ion exchange resin can be used to cover the regenerant collector instead of inert material.
Air hold-down is suitable for regeneration flow rates up to 10 m/h, thus fine for sulphuric acid regeneration at a low concentration.
The depth of inert or inactive resin must be enough to cover the regenerant collector at the beginning as well as the end of regeneration; resin swelling must be taken into account when determining its volume. Vessels with water hold-down
In production
RFR
In regeneration
RFR
These are the same as the air hold-down units, except that the counterpressure needed during regeneration is exerted with a flow of water from the top rather than air. In this case, the regenerant collector is buried in the resin bed. The part of the resin that is located above the collector never gets regenerated, and is thus called "inactive". The other disadvantage of this system is that it consumes more water in the regeneration process, and produces a larger volume of waste. In Europe, water hold-down units have not been very popular for this reason.
Water hold-down units can be operated only at very low regeneration flow rates otherwise the hydraulic system is unstable.
The downward flow rate of the hold-down stream must be adjusted as a function of the upward regenerant injection flow rate, density of the regenerant, density of the resin and acceptable contact time, which should not be too long for sulphuric acid regeneration. Although not a rule, it seems that the hold-down flow rate is often equal to the flow rate of the regenerant solution. No inert material is required. The resin volume must be calculated including the amount of inactive resin that must always cover the collector.

Stratified beds
Stratabed
These are hold-down units containing a pair of cation or anion resins: the weakly functional resin has a smaller particle size, and its density is lower than that of the strongly functional resin allows the two components to be kept separated. Some mixing of both layers at the interface is inevitable, though, and periodical re-separation is required. The stratified bed technology saves a column and brings the benefit of a good regeneration efficiency. As the weak resin always has a density smaller than the strong base, stratified bed must always be regenerated in reverse flow. For co-flow regeneration, two separate columns are necessary.
Stratified beds are also called layered beds. StratabedTM is a trademark of Dow.

Air and water hold-down, including Stratabed As we have just seen, additional resin is required, either inert (air holddown) or inactive ion exchange resin (water holddown).

Split-flow units
Split-flow
In split-flow vessels, regeneration is carried out simultaneously from the top and from the bottom of the bed. The regenerant collector is located in the upper third of the resin bed. An additional regenerant distributor is required above the resin bed. The idea is to allow the upper part of the bed to be backwashed to remove accumulated debris without disturbing the lower layers of the bed that are responsible for the good treated water quality. There is no inert or inactive resin, and the system does not consume extra water, but is more complicated and the regeneration flows are sometimes difficult to adjust.

Resins used in vessels with freeboard Practically all resins can be used. In practice, standard grades are often chosen for co-flow units, because they are cheaper.
For reverse flow regeneration, uniform particle size resins are often selected due to their better hydraulic characteristics and to a slightly higher operating capacity compared to the standard grades. For Stratabed units, a fine specially graded weak resin is required, as well as a high density and coarser strong resin.


Packed bed units

Those have no freeboard — although a little space must be allowed to accommodate resin swelling — and no internals that obstruct the hydraulic flow and can be easily damaged. The vessels are thus smaller and cheaper, and the resin depth is usually higher than in a column with freeboard. This offers a benefit for strongly acidic and strongly basic resins, which have a higher operating capacity when the bed depth is high. Also, there is no need for an inactive resin, although Bayer's floating bed and Dow's Upcore use an inert material. Of course, the resin can no longer be backwashed in situ due to the absence of freeboard. A separate backwash column is necessary in most cases.

Floating bed units
Amberpack
Amberpack in service and regeneration

Called "Schwebebett" by Bayer AG in 1963, this design has upflow loaded, downflow regenerated columns in which the bed was initially partially fluidised. The floating bed technology has been a big success since the mid 1970's has been adopted, with some variations, by most of the European OEMs. Today, these units are fully packed with practically no fluidised resin.
Bayer's Schwebebett (called WS system in some countries) uses an inert floating material at the top of the resin chamber. It cannot be backwashed.

AmberpackTM
Amberpack
Amberpack with double chamber

The Amberpack system of Rohm and Haas is a variation of the floating bed and enables resin transfer to a backwashing column. The ion exchange vessels are similar to Bayer's Schwebebett units, the differences being the absence of inert floating material and the presence of at least two transfer ports per resin chamber, through which resins can be taken out for backwashing. The resins are exhausted upflow and regenerated downflow. In multicompartment Amberpack columns, two (sometimes three) resins are separated by a plate fitted with double nozzles. This is the ideal system for WBA/SBA and for WAC/SAC combinations: it gives the best efficiency and treated water quality. Each compartent has two transfer ports for external backwashing.
The WAC/SAC combination with sulphuric acid regeneration requires a special version with secondary dilution.
Amberpack demin line
A full Amberpack demineralisation line followed by a mixed bed polisher

UpcoreTM
Upcore
Upcore column in service and regeneration

UpCoRe stands for "Upflow Countercurrent Regeneration". Dow licensed this technology from the Dutch engineering company Esmil in the late 1970s. The units are exhausted downflow and regenerated upflow. A special inert polymer called Dowex Upcore IF62 fills the upper part of the columns.
Dow claim that their system is "self-cleaning", and that suspended solids accumulated during the exhaustion run escape during the first stage of regeneration, but this is only partially true: the system is not capable of eliminating large amounts of suspended matter, unlike Amberpack with its dedicated backwashing tower.
Besides, upflow regeneration is more difficult than downflow, particularly with hydrochloric acid, because of the high velocity required to compact the bed and the resulting short contact time. This system consumes a little more water, as an additional step is required to compact the bed against the top nozzle plate before regenerant injection.
Upcore is also available as Amberpack Reverse, the main difference being the presence of a backwash column as a safety feature.
Upcore is useful when the plant works intermittently or when large flow rate variations are expected.

StratapackTM
Stratapack
A Stratapack vessel

Stratapack columns, which are Amberpack Reverse units in the Stratabed fashion, and offer the advantages of both. Inert resin is necessary in view of the relatively fine particle size of the weak base or weak acid resin. The column has three transfer ports. The system is also available as Upcore layered bed.
Stratapack cation units are not recommended with sulphuric acid regeneration.
Because a little mixing at the interface cannot be prevented, Stratapack is not quite as efficient as a double-compartment Amberpack. Additionally, it consumes a little more water, like Amberpack Reverse. To minimise the effect of resin mixing, a higher dosage of regenerant is often used. The common characteristic of all Amberpack systems is the presence of a backwash column, which is an essential safety device to ensure smooth operation of the water treatment plant.

Resins used in packed bed units
Only uniform or semi-uniform grades are suitable. Standard grades will cause serious trouble due to the fine bead fraction. For Stratapack units, a fine specially graded weak resin is required, as well as a high density and coarser strong resin.

Some other technologies

Many OEMs have their own proprietary design. Only a few will be mentioned here.

Econex
The Econex system
EconexTM
This system was developed in the 1970s by Italba-Ionics and Davy-Bamag. The columns have a freeboard, but in normal operation it is filled with inert material so the columns do not need an air or water hold-down during regeneration. When the resin has to be backwashed, the inert is extracted to a holding tank and backwashing is performed in the ion exchange column.
The columns are simple, but large and a transfer system is needed. Some units have double chamber anion columns to house a WBA above and a SBA below.

Recoflo
A ReCoFlo unit
ReCoFloTM
This technology was developed by the Canadian Ecotec Corporation. The columns are very shallow, with a bed depth of typically only about 15 cm (6 inches). Cycles are very short, the service run being only about 20 minutes. Special, fine resins are used. This technology was mainly applied in the surface treatment industry.


ISEP
A simplified ISEP system
ISEPTM
ISEP is a simulated moving bed, operating in a quasi continuous, stepwise fashion. It was developed by the US company Advanced Separation Technologies (AST), now a subsidiary of Calgon Carbon. The columns typically 30 of them) are arranged in a carrousel (merry-go-round). The feed and elution solutions are connected to a stationary upper distributor fitted with typically 20 ports, and the raffinate as well as the extract are connected to a lower stationary connector fitted with the same number of ports. The columns themselves are on a rotating frame. The carrousel rotates continuously at a speed of 0.1 to 1.5 revolutions per hour, and the ports are thus successively connected to all columns. A simplified schema is shown here with only 8 columns and 6 inlet and outlet ports. Simulated moving beds can be used for chromatography, for purification of fermentation broth, sugar syrup deashing, colour removal from various solutions, separation of metals and other applications. The major problem with this system is leaks between the heads of the rotating columns and the fixed distributor.
Higgins
Higgins loop (click)
Other "continuous" systems The Higgins loop shown on the right is a semi-continuous process where a portion of the resin inventory is contacted with the solution to be treated whilst another portion is regenerated and rinsed. At regular intervals (when the resin in the exchange zone is exhausted) a new fraction of freshly regenerated resin is pushed into the exchange chamber, which the exhausted resin leaves to be backwashed and regenerated. The resin and the liquid move in opposite directions. This process is used in various applications such as uranium and gold mining.
The Asahi/ECI system of Degrémont, the Kontimat system of Hager und Elsässer, and the ChemSeps system of Cochrane were popular in the late 1960's and in the 1970's. The resin inventory was small and the production semi-continuous. However, they were quite complicated in design and delicate in operation, and their very short cycles caused the toughest resins to wear rapidly. A few of the continuous plants were still in operation after 2000, but no new installations of this type are built. They are progressively replaced by more simple reverse flow regeneration systems, which also offer a better regeneration efficiency.

Polishing units

There are basically two types of polishers, used in water demineralisation and condensate treatment:
  1. Units with mixed resins
  2. Units with separate resins, in one or several vessels

Mixed bed units
Mixed bed
A mixed bed in service

Strongly acidic cation resin is mixed with strongly basic anion resin. The quality of treated water is excellent, typically with a conductivity of less than 0.1 µS/cm and a residual silica of less than 10 or even down to 1 µg/L when properly designed and operated. The resins must however be separated for regeneration. This is a delicate and lengthy operation.
Regeneration involves the following steps:
  • Backwash for separation
  • Settling
  • Acid injection from the bottom, extraction through the middle collector
  • Acid displacement
  • Caustic injection from the ad hoc distributor, extraction through the middle collector
  • Caustic displacement
  • Air mixing
  • Final fast rinse
See details in the regeneration page.

Regeneration of a mixed bed unit is not efficient, due to the shallow bed depth of the components and the resulting hydraulic distribution problems. Mixed bed vessels are also more complicated than single bed units. For this reason, mixed bed units are mostly used to treat water with very low salinity, as in this case cycles are reasonably long and chemical efficiency is thus not critical.
Mixed bed units used to treat water with more than traces of salinity are usually called "Working MBs".
Mixed bed polishers are often designed based on specific flow rate in BV/h rather than on salinity and running time.
See also the section about water polishers in the page about water treatment processes.

Spherical units
Mixed bed
A spherical vessel

Some power stations have condensate polishers operating under high pressure: 4 to 5 MPa (40 to 50 bar, 600 to 700 psi). In this case the shell of the vessel must be very thick. For this reason spherical vessels are built, because a sphere has a better resistance to pressure than a cylinder, and one can save in the thickness of the vessel shell. Those have disadvantages compared to cylindrical columns, as the flow through the resin bed is less uniform. See the condensate polishing page.

TriobedTM units
Mixed bed
A Triobed after separation

Triobed is a trademark of Rohm and Haas. The concept was developed by Duolite in the 1970's, and had immediate success. The idea was to mix a third, inert component to the active SAC and SBA resins. Density and particle size of the three components are precisely adjusted so that the inert forms a separating layer between cation and anion resins after backwash. Click on the adjacent picture for a better understanding of the principle. Triobed doesn't have only advantages:
  • The inert resin has sometimes problems: it may float if there are traces of oil in the water or condensate, or attract air bubbles at the time of backwashing.
  • The inert "dilutes" the active resins, and uses space: the total capacity of the bed is reduced.
  • The SAC resin is very coarse, which is detrimental to its kinetics, and requires a high backwash flow rate for separation.
For these reasons, conventional two-component mixed beds are now preferred. Amberjet and other uniform resins resins give a very sharp separation, and if absolutely no cross-contamination is acceptable, other techniques are available with external regeneration.
For existing Triobed units, only very specific resin combinations are allowed.

AmberpackTM SandwichTM
Sandwich
Amberpack Sandwich unit

A different type of polisher, with separate cation and anion resins, not a mixed bed. Amberpack Sandwich polishing units are double chamber Amberpack columns with a strong acid and a strong base resin, separated by a nozzle plate. Twice the efficiency of a mixed bed, and half the size.
The small freeboard (see picture) is usually be filled with a floating inert material. A collector is located just below this separation plate. The advantages of Amberpack Sandwich compared to mixed bed units are:
  • As the column is almost full, it contains twice the resin amount, and offers thus a double capacity for the same vessel size.
  • As resins are never mixed, all problems of cross-contamination found in MBs are avoided.
  • Regeneration is in counterflow mode, thus a much smaller quantity of regenerants is required.
  • Sandwich gives the same treated water quality as a conventional MB.
It is sometimes preferred to have the anion column in the bottom compartment: in this way, traces of Na from the anion resin are eliminated by the cation resin. This arrangement is possible only when the feed does not contain any hardness.
Sandwich units can also be used, like "working MBs", for the treatment of low salinity water, such as RO permeate.
TripolTM
A system with separate resin beds in a single column developed by Permutit (now Veolia). Regeneration is external: the cation resins are transferred to a separate regeneration column. The bottom resin is transferred first, then the top resin on top of it. Therefore, the resin from the bottom compartment receives the maximum acid and is always perfectly regenerated. This system is used for condensate polishing.
MultistepTM
This is an inverted Tripol patented by Bayer AG and operating in floating bed fashion. Regeneration is in situ. Of course, the acid must by-pass the anion resin, so two additional collectors/distributors are necessary. Acid comes from the top, is extracted through the collector just underneath the top compartment, then re-injected through the second distributor just underneath the anion compartment. Inert is required.
Separate columns
A combination of SAC and SBA in separate columns, with co-flow regeneration, was the first kind of polishing installed even before mixed beds became popular.
In Germany, several condensate polishers have been installed with this concept, but the columns are of the floating bed type to maximise efficiency and quality.
Resins used in separate bed polishers
As most of these are packed bed units, uniform grades are recommended. For DI polishers, the standard choice is gel type. For condensate polishers, the hybrid gel cation/macroporous anion combination is recommended.

Construction material

Click the small pictures.
Lab columns
In the laboratory, glass columns are used for resin testing or quality control.
Fiberglass
Small units are usually made of fiberglass reinforced plastic. See also SDI.
Industrial columns
Industrial units are made of steel with an internal hard rubber coating.
Stainless
In the food industry and some other industries, ion exchange columns are often made of stainless steel.


Nozzles

Nozzle plate
A nozzle plate with stiffening beam

Backwash column

Backwash towerRienBackwash towerA backwash tower. Left: principle, right: photograph of the bottom of the column.

Ion exchange plant design

$
0
0

Ion exchange plant design

Some basic principles

You will not find here a complete plant design manual. Only a few general recommendations to ensure that an ion exchange system is designed economically and to achieve good performance, and a simple, but detailed example. Basic column types are shown in another page. Reputable water treatment companies have their own technologies and design methods. We will cover in this page some of the basic parameters to consider when designing an ion exchange plant.
These parameters are:
  • Feed water analysis
  • Production flow rate
  • Cycle length
  • Required quality of the treated water
  • Regeneration technology
  • Dimensions of the vessels
  • Selection of resin types
This page is mainly focused on demineralisation systems, but most of the principles and recommendations apply to other ion exchange processes: softening, dealkalisation, nitrate removal etc.

Analysis of the feed water

All ion exchange systems are designed for a given feed water. Some variations of the feed water analysis are acceptable, and should be taken into account, but an ion exchange system cannot be designed efficiently for vastly different water types. For instance, a demineralisation system designed for the treatment of deep well water is completely different from a system designed to treat reverse osmosis permeate.
Water analysisThe first thing to do is thus obtain a reliable water analysi.
When the water analysis is not constant, e.g. due to seasonal variations, do not take an "average composition" as the basis of your design. Instead, use the "most probable" case, design with this water, and check as a second step what will happen with the "minimum" and "maximum"' waters. All water analyses must be perfectly balanced, as shown in the example on the right.
The water analysis will determine what resin combination is required, and if a degasifier should be considered.


Production flow rate

It is important to know whether the system will operate at constant or variable flow rate. Some system designs require a minimum flow rate (e.g. AmberpackTM). Obviously, the system should be able to operate at both limits.
In general, it is not advisable to operate intermittently, i.e. to stop production in the middle of the run and re-start it. Treated water quality may be affected after a stop not followed by regeneration.


Cycle length

A short cycle length is desirable in most cases. The practical limit is that the production run should be at least as long as the regeneration process. As most ion exchange systems are regenerated automatically, the duration of the production run does not have to be "at least one day" as was the rule at the time (many decades ago) when the morning shift would regenerate manually every day at 7 o'clock. Efficient systems have been designed with running times as short as 3 hours.
The limits of the running time are also related to resin kinetics. When reading ion exchange resin product data sheets, you will typically see that the specific flow rate in water treatment should be between 5 and 50 bed volumes per hour (m3/h per m3 of resin). At lower flow rates, hydraulic distribution in the resin bed may be poor, and at higher flow rates, kinetic effects may affect the speed of exchange, resulting in both cases in deterioration of the treated water quality.
So in practice the running time must be selected as a function of the following parameters:
  • Specific flow rate between 5 and 50 bed volumes per hour (BV/h).
  • Mixed bed units should be designed to operate at a minimum of 12 to 15 BV/h.
  • Make the system as small as possible for economical reasons (lower investment in hardware and resins).
  • For packed bed systems, ensure that bed compaction is good both in the production phase (e.g. AmberpackTM) and during regeneration (e.g. UpcoreTM).
With low salinity waters, e.g. when the feed water is good RO permeate, the running time can be several days. Mixed bed polishers after a primary demineralisation will run for several weeks before regeneration is required.


Treated water quality

In ion exchange the quality of the treated water does not depend much on the feed water analysis. Factors affecting the treated water quality are essentially related to the regeneration process.
To a minor extend, temperature may affect the residual silica leakage in the treated water: at temperatures higher than about 50 °C, silica is hardly removed by strongly basic anion exchange resins (SBA).
Other than that, you can expect the treated water quality of a regeneration system regenerated in reverse flow to be:
  • Conductivity: ~ 1 µS/cm
  • Silica: 10 to 25 µg/L
For polishing MB units, conductivity is generally around 0.1 µS/cm, and silica less than 10 µg/L. Well designed and operated mixed bed polishers can achieve a conductivity close to that of pure water (0.055 µS/cm) and silica in the single µg/L range, or below.

Regeneration technology

Details of the regeneration are given in a separate page. Another page shows the corresponding column designs.
Except for very small ion exchange units (and for de-alkalisation with a WAC resin only), plants should always be designed using reverse flow regeneration. Packed bed columns are particularly useful, as they offer a compact and economical design, and very good treated water quality. They are normally sized for relatively short cycles.
One should however pay attention to the following points:
AmberpackTM and other floating bed columns
Those have upflow loading and downflow regeneration. The service flow rate must be high enough to keep the bed compacted. For SAC resins, that have the highest specific gravity, the linear flow rate must be comprised between 25 and about 70 m/h (at about 20 °C). Other resins have a lower specific gravity and are compacted at a lower flow rate, the minimum being about 16 m/h.
UpcoreTM and similar units
With downflow loading and upflow regeneration, the regeneration flow rate must be high enough to keep the bed compacted. This is achieved using the following tricks:
  • An initial short compaction step is performed at about 30 m/h before regenerant injection
  • Regenerant concentration may have to be reduced so that the acid solution can be injected at 7 or more m/h in the SAC unit, and the caustic solution at more than 5 m/h in the anion exchange unit.
  • Contact time of the regenerant solution may have to be reduced.
Short contact times and lower regenerant concentration may however affect the efficiency of regeneration.

Vessel sizing

ColumnsFor a given resin volume, it is generally cheaper to make a tall and narrow column rather than a wide and short unit: in the illustration, both columns contain the same resin volume. Column B is cheaper, because the major cost components of the column are the dished ends and nozzle plates.
There is no limit in height, except that the pressure drop at maximum flow rate should not exceed 100 to 150 kPa (1 to 1.5 bar) at maximum flow rate with clean resins.
When selecting the vessel diameter, the limits of the preceding section (regeneration technology) should also be considered.


Resin choice

You will have to refer to the resin manufacturer. However, a few general recommendations can be made:
  • Macroporous resins are normally not required for demineralisation or softening
  • An exception: all styrenic WBA resins are macroporous
  • Special particle sizes are required depending on the design technology:
    • uniform or semi-uniform resins are necessary for packed beds
    • special grades are required for stratified beds (e.g. StratabedTM or StratapackTM)
    • special grades are also required for mixed bed polishers
  • When the feed water contains high organics, acrylic anion resins are a good choice

How to calculate by hand, approximately

You can make an approximate calculation by hand even without using a computer program or the engineering data of the resin manufacturer. The results may be only 20 % precise, but will give you an idea. In any case, it is a good exercise for understanding the basic principles presented above.
This calculation can be done for softening units and for simple demineralisation trains comprising a single (strongly acidic) cation exchange resin column an optional degasifier and a single (strongly basic) anion exchange resin column.
Here is the procedure for a simple demineralisation plant:
  1. Examine water analysis (details above)
  2. Calculate cation concentration Cc [meq/L]
  3. Decide about the use of a degasifier:
    If the bicarbonate content is greater than 0.6 to 1.0 meq/L a degasifier may be justified
  4. Calculate the anion concentration Ca [meq/L]: it contains
    Cl, SO4=, NO3, SiO2, HCO3or residual CO2 after degasser if any
  5. Decide about a reasonable running time t in hours between regenerations
  6. Using the flow rate f in m3/h calculate the throughput Q [m3]:
    Q = f · t [m3]
  7. Calculate the ionic load per cycle in eq (concentration in meq/L times throughput in m3):
    • Cation load [eq] = Cc· Q
    • Anion load [eq] = Ca· Q
  8. Consider the approximate operating capaciy of the resins as follows:
    • SAC: capc = 1.0 eq/L with HCl regeneration or
      SAC: capc = 0.8 eq/L with H2SO4 regeneration
    • SBA: capa = 0.5 eq/L
  9. The resin volume V required (in litres) is equal to the ionic load [eq] divided by the operating capacity [eq/L]:
    • SAC: Vc = Cc· Q / capc [L]
    • SBA: Va = Ca· Q / capa [L]
  10. At the end of this calculation, we must make sure that the specific flow rate of both resin columns is compatible with the general recommendations of the resin producer. The specific flow rate in h—1 (often expressed in bed volumes per hour BV/h) is equal to the flow rate in m3/h divided by the resin volume in m3. The usual range is 5 to 50 h—1. For a compact plant with minimum investment cost, use a specific flow rate around 30 to 35 h—1.
    If the specific flow rates calculated from the resin volumes Vc and Va are too high, increase the running time t. If they are too low, reduce the running time t.
This calculation is obviously only approximate, as we have taken in point 8 an estimated operating capacity for both resins, not taking into account several parameters that, in reality, affect this capacity: regeneration level, exact water composition, temperature, selected endpoint, etc. Furthermore, the additional ionic load caused by the quantity of ancillary water required to dilute regenerants and rinse resins has not been taken into account. Depending on the feed water salinity, this extra water can increase the ionic load by 2 to 10 %.
Besides, the calculation of WAC/SAC or WBA/SBA resin couples cannot be done by hand, as it requires iterations for the optimisation of the "overrun".
A precise calculation can be done with a dedicated software, such as IXCalcTM for the resins produced by Dow.

Example

DeminUsing the 10 point procedure described above.
  1. Water analysis [meq/L]
    Cations Anions
    Ca 3.2 Cl 1.1
    Mg 0.7 SO40.6
    Na 0.9 NO30.2

     HCO32.9
    Σ Cations4.8 Σ Anions4.8

     SiO20.4
  2. Cc = 4.8 meq/L
  3. HCO3 = 2.9 meq/L — a degasifier is recommended
    Residual CO2 after degasifier = 0.25 meq/L
  4. Ca = 1.1 + 0.6 + 0.2 + 0.25 = 2.15 meq/L
  5. Select runnning time t = 12 h
  6. Flow rate 60 m3/h
    Throughput 60 · 12 = 720 m3
  7. Ionic load
    • Cation load [eq] = 4.8 · 720 = 3456 eq
    • Anion load [eq] = 2.15 · 720 = 1548 eq
  8. Operating capacity
    • Cation regeneration with HCl: capc = 1.0 eq/L
    • Anion regeneration with NaOH: capa = 0.5 eq/L
  9. Resin volumes
    • SAC: Vc = 3456 / 1.0 = 3456 L
    • SBA: Va = 1548 / 0.5 = 3096 L
  10. Specific flow rate
    • SAC: 60 / 3.456 = 16.9 h—1
    • SBA: 60 / 3.096 = 19.4 h—1
    The specific flow rate values are OK, but one could reduce the running time to say 8 hours to make the plant smaller. The new data would then be:
    • Throughput 60 · 8 = 480 m3
    • Cation load [eq] = 4.8 · 480 = 2304
    • Anion load [eq] = 2.15 · 480 = 1032 eq
    • SAC volume: Vc = 2304 / 1.0 = 2304 L
    • SBA volume: Va = 1032 / 0.5 = 2064 L
    • SAC flow rate: 60 / 2.304 = 26.0 h—1
    • SBA flow rate: 60/2.064 = 29.1 h—1
    In most cases, the demineralisation system will comprise at least 2 trains operating alternatively, with automatic regeneration, so the shorter running time is an advantage. We have assumed in our example (see picture above) that the colums are regenerated in Amberpack mode, which will guarantee a very good treated water quality, with typically less than 1 µS/cm conductivity and less than 10 µg/L residual silica.
     
    Amberpack, Upcore, Stratabed, and Stratapack are trademarks of the Dow Chemical Company.

Experimenting with ion exchange resins requires a simple setup and a few basic precautions.

$
0
0

Laboratory trials and setup

Introduction

Experimenting with ion exchange resins requires a simple setup and a few basic precautions.
Resin volume
For most applications, resins are used and measured by volume, not by weight. A quantity of 50 to 250 ml of resin is usually sufficient to perform efficiency and capacity tests.
Basic setup
The laboratory setup shown here can be used as an example. More sophisticated arrangements including pumps and regeneration equipment are also used. The basic setup includes:
  1. A tank containing the solution to be treated.
  2. A small tap or a rubber tube with a screw clamp to control the flow rate.
  3. A column fitted with a rubber stopper.
  4. The ion exchange resin to be tested.
  5. The bottom of the column must be fitted with fritted glass. Another option is a second rubber stopper covered with a nylon cloth and a small layer of glass beads.
  6. Another small tap.
  7. The bottom tank collects the treated solution.
The column diameter should be selected so as to have a resin bed depth of 300 to 800 mm. In most cases, this means a diameter of 20 to 25 mm. Glass or plexiglas columns are usually suitable. Glass columns should be avoided when resins are regenerated with caustic soda. The volume of resin should be measured with sufficient precision. As in small columns, a wall effect may affect the results, you can weigh a resin quantity, transfer it to a graduated cylinder, tap it gently on a rubber mat and measure the volume.
The operating capacity of the resin can be calculated using the information in the capacity page.

The picture shows a quantity of solution above the resin bed. It is most important never to let the column run dry, otherwise the hydraulic distribution may be disturbed and the resin may be damaged. Regeneration of the resin can be carried out in the same equipment. Regeneration steps include:
  • Backwash (optional)
  • Regenerant injection
  • Regenerant displacement
  • Rinse
  Recommended operating conditions
Resin volume50 to 250 ml
Column diameter20 to 30 mm
Resin bed depth150 to 800 mm
Loading flow rate2 to 40 BV/h
Regenerant flow rate2 to 5 BV/h
Regenerant contact time20 to 60 minutes
Regenerant displacement2 to 4 BV of water
Final rinse2 to 10 BV at service flow rate
The flow rate is expressed in bedvolumes per hour (BV/h), i.e. in litres of solution per litre of resin per hour. In general, the highest the concentration of contaminants to remove, the lowest the flow rate to use. When filling the column with resin, a short backwash with deionised water is recommended to ensure proper packing and classification of the bed.

More than one cycle may be required

To determine the operating capacity and the leakage, it is often necessary to perform several cycles of exhaustion and regeneration. The first run made with a new, totally regenerated resin, produces generally a higher capacity and a lower leakage. After two or three cycle, an equilibrium is obtained, and the subsequent cycles should be more or less identical.
 
Lab columnsGlass columns in the Lanxess laboratory

Ion exchange capacity

$
0
0

Ion exchange capacity

Introduction

Ion exchange is a cyclic process: ions are loaded to resins, the resins get progressively exhausted, and when there is no place to load more ions, the loading phase is interrupted, and the resins must be regenerated.
Ion exchange capacity indicates the quantity of ions loaded to the resin.

Definitions

Total capacity
The total capacity of a resin sample is the number of ion exchange sites.In other words, the total capacity is the maximum theoretical quantity of ions that the resin can load.
Operating capacity
Also called useful capacity, it is the number of ion exchange sites where exchange has really taken place during the loading run. It is also the number of resin charges — not the number of ions because some ions have more than one charge — picked up by the resin in one cycle. In other words, the operating capacity is the actual quantity of ions loaded on the resin between regenerations.
The ion exchange capacity is expressed as eq/L (equivalents per litre of resin).
The unit of mole should be avoided altogether in ion exchange, as it does not take valence into account and brings only confusion. For reference: 1 eq = 1 mole / valence.
The operating capacity is always smaller than the total capacity. We will see why.

Zone of exchange

Ideal case
Begin
Start of the run
Middle
Middle of the run
End
End of the run
In an ideal case, we would start with a fully regenerated resin. During the exhaustion run, the exchange front would be absolutely flat, meaning that each infinitesimal resin layer would be instantaneously converted from regenerated to exhausted, capturing the incoming ions with an infinite speed of exchange. This flat front would move down the column as more ions are removed from water. At some point, the flat front would reach the bottom of the column, and the resin would then be totally exhausted. In such a case, the operating capacity would be equal to the total capacity of the resin. This case does not exist in practice, as the exchange front is not flat and the resin is not always fully regenerated at the beginning of the run.
In the real world, there are two cases:
Case 1: the resin is totally regenerated at the beginning of the run (WAC & WBA)
Begin
Start of the run
Middle
Middle of the run
End
End of the run
At the start of the run, the resin is totally regenerated. In the course of the loading run, the top layers of the bed get progressively exhausted. However, the exchange reaction is not infinitely fast, as the ions must find their way to available sites inside each resin bead. Therefore, some ions find their way to lower levels of the bed before the layers above are totally exhausted. The area between fully regenerated and fully exhausted resin is called exchange zone or reaction zone, as shown in the pictures.
At some stage, the ions begin to "leak" iinto the treated water. The loading run is stopped at the time the concentration of this ion leakage reaches a preset value. This is called the endpoint of the run. At this stage, the ion exchange resin is not fully exhausted, so the operating capacity is smaller than the total capacity.
The operating capacity is, as defined above, the difference between the exhausted resin at the start and at the end of the run. The behaviour shown here is typical of weakly acidic and weakly basic ion exchange resins, that can be fully regenerated with a minimum amount of regenerant, close to the stoichiometric value. A stoichimetric regenerant quantity is the quantity of chemical equivalents exactly equal to the ionic load during the exchange cycle. In practice, weak resins are regenerated with a small excess over the stoichiometric quantity.
The typical operating capacity of a weak base anion exchange resin is 70 to 90 % of the total capacity. For weak acid cation resin, operating capacity depends on several parameters, so there is no such simple estimate. However, WAC resins having a high total capacity and being regenerated almost without an excess (see regenerant ratio), their use is very helpful for waters containing a high concentration of alkalinity and hardness.
Case 2: the resin is partially exhausted at the beginning of the run (SAC & SBA)
Begin
Start of the run
Middle
Middle of the run
End
End of the run
This second case is typical of strongly acidic and strongly basic resins, which are more difficult to regenerate, so that an excess of regenerant chemical must be passed through the resin bed. Even so, it is not economical to regenerate the resin totally, which would mean a very high regenerant dosage, so in practice the resin bed is only partially regenerated. The pictures here indicate a resin bed with downflow loading and upflow regeneration. See the page about regeneration details.
Typically the operating capacity of SAC and SBA resins is 40 to 60 % of their total capacity.
Case 2b: co-flow regenerated resins
Begin
Start of the run
Middle
Middle of the run
End
End of the run
The feed water during the exhaustion run and the regeneration solution are both flowing from top to bottom. As a result, the top layers of the resin bed are well regenerated at the start of the run, but the bottom of the bed is not. During the exhaustion run, a fraction of the ions from the feed not removed during regeneration leak into the treated water, as shown in the regeneration page.
For example, if the resin is regenerated with acid, some of the H+ ions released by the removal of Na+ ions from the feed wander down the column and displace a few of the Na+ ions left at the bottom after the previous regeneration. The sodium leakage is thus much higher than with reverse flow regeneration.

Ion exchange kinetics

Weak acid and weak base resins are sensitive to flow rate. When the flow rate increases, the reaction zone becomes longer.
Fast exchange
Low flow rate:
the reaction zone is short
Slow exchange
High flow rate:
the reaction zone is long
When the reaction zone is short, the achievable operating capacity is higher, because a higher fraction of the total capacity can be used before the leakage reaches its endpoint.
SAC and SBA resins are less sensitive to flow rate.
Fine resins have generally higher kinetics; this is especially true for WAC and WBA resins. The reason is a shorter path for the ions to travel inside the resin beads.

Parameters affecting operating capacity

The operating capacity depends on a number of process variables including:
  • Concentration and type of ions to be adsorbed
  • Service flow rate
  • Temperature
  • Type, concentration and quantity of regenerant
  • Type of regeneration process (co-flow, reverse flow...)
  • Bed depth (reverse flow regeneration only)
  • Particle size of the ion exchange resins
The ion exchange resin manufacturers publish performance data allowing users to calculate the operating capacity of their resins under the most common conditions of use. Several of them also have computer programs to make basic designs for ion exchange systems. I have developed such a program for Rohm and Haas under the name of IXCalc.

Measurement of the total capacity

The total capacity of a resin sample is measured by titration and expressed in eq/L. The procedure involves a volume measurement and must be carried out under strict conditions. As the volume changes according to the ionic form of the resin — some ions have a higher mass and their volume is different from others — the ionic form of measurement must always be reported. The total capacity must also be reported as dry weight capacity after drying of the resin sample. The dry weight capacity measures the number of active groups per kg of dry resin, i.e. without the moisture content. It is expressed in eq/kg. Mention of the ionic form is critical here as well, as different ions have different masses.
Dry weight capacity is important for two different purposes:
  1. For new resins, it gives information about the efficiency of the activation process: for instance, if every aromatic ring has been sulphonated in a strongly acidic resin, the theoretical maximum total dry weight capacity is about 5.5 eq/kg in H+ form.
  2. For used resins, it gives information about a possible fouling: a fouled resin sample contains foreign matter, which increases the dry weight, and as a consequence the dry weight capacity (number of active groups per kg of dry matter) decreases, even if no functional group has been lost.

Operating capacity in practice

We have seen that the operating capacity of an ion exchange resin is a fraction of the total capacity. It is also expressed in eq/L (equivalents per litre of resin) and indicates the quantity of ions (more precisely the number of charges) that can be exchanged during a cycle. The following table shows typical total and operating capacity values for the common resins (all values in eq/L, most common value in brackets):

Resin type*Total capacityOperating capacity
WAC3.7 to 4.5 [4.2]1.0 to 3.5
SAC1.7 to 2.2 [2.0]0.6 to 1.7
WBA1.1 to 1.7 [1.3]0.8 to 1.3
SBA0.9 to 1.4 [1.2]0.4 to 0.9
* See abbreviations and resin types Let's consider for example a strongly acidic cation exchange resin (SAC) used for softening, and let's assume the water to be treated has a hardness concentration of 4.4 meq/L and the resin, under specific operating conditions, has an operating capacity of 1.1 eq/L, which is 1100 meq/L.
Each litre of ion exchange resin will thus be able to treat 1100 / 4.4 = 250 litres of the hard water before having to be regenerated. In ion exchange jargon, this means that the throughput is 250 bed volumes. If the water hardness is higher, the throughput will be less, and vice-versa. See also concentration and capacity units.

Experimental calculation of the operating capacity

Softening example
You have an ion exchange column containing a volume V (litres) of SAC(Na) resin. The water you are treating contains a concentration C of hardness expressed in meq/L. To measure and calculate the operating capacity, you must measure continuously the residual hardness coming out of the column, or take a sample every few minutes (say 5 to 15 min) and analyse its hardness. Plotting the individual residual hardness values should produce the following red curve.
Softening
The cycle is stopped when the residual hardness reaches the endpoint value. At this point, a volume Q of soft water has been produced. The quantity R of hardness ions removed by the resin is (in meq):
R = Q · C
And the operating capacity of your column is:
Cap = Q · C / V (meq/L)
Example: your column holds V = 2000 L of resin (Amberjet 1000 Na), your feed water contains C = 6 meq/L of hardness, your throughput Q is 360 m3 = 360'000 L, so the operating capacity of the column is
Cap = (360'000 · 6) / 2000 = 1080 meq/L = 1.08 eq/L
Exactly the same calculation would apply to a nitrate removal column using a nitrate-selective SBA resin, where the nitrate concentration would be used instead of hardness.
Demineralisation
The situation here is more complicated, because you have at least two resin types (cation and anion exchangers), and sometimes three or four (weak and strong). If you have two resins only, the cation resin profile is similar to the above graph, but you would use the conductivity (after the anion column) as a control parameter instead of hardness. To calculate the cation resin capacity, you would need the total cation concentration in the feed water, and for the anion resin you would need the anion concentration after degasifier (if any) making sure to add silica and free CO2 to the anions.
Important remark
The test should not be done with a "virgin" resin. A few cycles (typically two or three) must be performed before the system reaches an equilibrium. The capacity of the first run (called cycle zero) is higher than that obtained in the subsequent cycles, because in this first run the resin is totally regenerated, which is not the case later.
ION EXCHANGE
Update 14 Jun 2013

Abbreviations and units
used in these pages


AbbreviationDescription
AlkAlkalinity (essentially HCO3)
BODBiological oxygen demand
BVBed volume (1 BV = 1 m3 water per m3 resin)
BV/h = h–1Specific flow rate or space velocity
(1 BV/h = 1 m3 water per m3 resin per hour)
CFRCo-flow ("co-current") regeneration
CODChemical oxygen demand
(oxidisable organics)
DIDe-ionisation
DMDemineralisation (is the same as DI)
DVBDivinylbenzene (cross-linker)
EMAEquivalent mineral acidity
(= Cl + SO4 + NO3 in raw water)
eqEquivalent (= mole divided by valency)
eq/L is a unit of ion exchange capacity,
meq/L is a unit of ionic concentration
FBFree base (regenerated) form of a WBA resin
FMAFree mineral acidity
(= Cl + SO4 + NO3 after cation exchange)
IXIon exchange
kPaKilopascal (unit of pressure = 0.01 bar)
MBMixed bed
meqMilliequivalent (see eq)
ppbPart per billion (10–9 = µg/kg or µg/L or mg/m3)
(very dilute solutions)
ppmPart per million (10–6 = mg/kg or mg/L or g/m3)
(in dilute solutions)
pptPart per trillion (10–12 = ng/kg or ng/L or µg/m3)
(extremely dilute solutions)
RFRReverse flow (counterflow or "counter-current") regeneration
ROReverse osmosis
SACStrong acid cation [resin]
SBAStrong base anion [resin]
TDSTotal dissolved solids
THTotal hardness (alkaline earth metals)
TOCTotal organic carbon
WACWeak acid cation [resin]
WBAWeak base anion [resin]
µS/cmMicroSiemens per centimetre (unit of conductivity)

Feed water and some recommended limits for ion exchange systems

$
0
0

Feed water
and some recommended limits for ion exchange systems

Introduction

Ion exchange resins exchange ions. Not a surprise, but the composition of the feed water affects plant performance. It is therefore essential to know precisely the water composition of the feed to the ion exchange system.
The following components and characteristics should be known:
  • Salinity (see also the separate page on water analysis details)
  • Suspended solids and turbidity
  • Temperature
  • pH value
  • Organic substances in the water
  • Other impurities, such as iron, manganese, aluminium, oil, polyelectrolytes...
We will examine the effect of all above parameters and try to set practical limits for each.

Salinity (water analysis)

This is the single most important item to estimate the performance of an ion exchange system. It is also one of the first things to check when plant performance deteriorates. You cannot rely on an analysis that was made months or years ago. Some effects of a change in salinity are:

Type of changeEffect
Higher salt contentShorter runs, lower throughput, sometimes lower quality of the treated water
Lower salt contentLonger runs, higher throughput
Change in ionic balance (e.g. less bicarbonate, more chloride)Change in treated water quality. The resin volumes become unbalanced, the degasifier has less or more carbon dioxide to handle
Higher ratio of silica to total anionsThis may increase silica leakage and require a change in regeneration conditions.

The picture below is a schematic representation of a water analysis, with cations and anions. A good water analysis must be balanced.
Feed water analysis
Click on picture to see it enlarged with more details.
See also a detailed description of the water analysis, with the concentration units to use and a table of the most common ions in water.
If the water analysis varies according to season, plant performance should be re-assessed, and perhaps operating conditions re-adjusted, to reflect the seasonal variations. If you don't analyse the water yourself, give a sample to a reputable laboratory for testing. If your feed water is city water, you should be able to obtain an accurate analysis from your municipality.
When re-assessing the performance of a plant, or optimising it, it is recommended to use the most probable analysis for the basic calculation, then to re-run the calculation with seasonal analyses to estimate plant throughput under various conditions. All the water analyses should be real, not maxima, averages or minima.
We strongly recommend that you should update the expected performance of the plant based on actual operating conditions. You should collect the necessary data:
  • Water analysis (after pre-treatment)
  • Resin types and volumes
  • Regeneration method (co-flow, reverse flow, packed beds)
  • Regenerant quantities and concentrations
Salinity limitsIon exchange is the perfect technology for low concentrations. At high salinity, the cycles become very short, regenerant consumption increases and in extreme cases the water required for regeneration may exceed the volume of treated water. As a guideline, a salinity of 20 meq/L (1000 ppm as CaCO3) seems to be the high limit, with some exceptions. Higher salinity water is probably best treated with RO.
Sea water cannot be demineralised by ion exchange, as the resins would be exhausted in less than 3 bed volumes.

Suspended solids and turbidity

Ideally, the feed water to an ion exchange vessel should be perfectly clear and free of suspended solids. It is essential to ensure that mechanical filters installed ahead of an ion exchange system operate properly. Insufficient filtration resulting in excessive suspended solids may cause:
  • Channeling of the resin bed, resulting in high leakage and short runs.
  • High pressure drop values, sometimes resulting in flow reduction, and requiring frequent backwash of the unit.
Suspended solids are traditionally measured by filtration on a 0.45 µm filter and expressed as dry mass. The tolerated amount of suspended solids varies according to the ion exchange technology and to the run length. If the resins can be easily backwashed and cleaned, a higher quantity of suspended solids is acceptable.
  • As co-flow regenerated vessels can be backwashed before each regeneration, they are not very sensitive to suspended solids, and several mg/L (ppm) are usually acceptable.
  • In all cases, if the system has long cycles, the accumulated suspended solids may cause pressure drop problems even if the amount of suspended solids in the feed is relatively low.
  • Reverse flow regenerated vessels are not backwashed at the end of every cycle, and the pressure drop should be monitored closely to determine when a resin backwash is necessary.
  • Packed bed units are more sensitive to suspended solids, as they cannot be backwashed in situ. In general, the tolerated suspended solids should be well below 1 mg/L (1 ppm).
    • In Upcore plants, the suspended solids land on the surface of the resin bed, and some are backwashed away during regeneration.
    • In Amberpack and floating bed, the suspended solids enter in a slightly fluidised part of the bed and accumulate there. A higher quantity is tolerated because it migrates partially upward, but this quantity cannot be removed until the resin is taken out to the backwash tower.
Turbidity (cloudiness or haziness) is measured in NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units). There is no fixed relation between turbidity and suspended solids.
Limits for suspended solids There is no simple number here: the most sensible way is to calculate the load of solids during one cycle and to express the result per square metre of vessel (cross-section). Here some suggestions:
Suspended solids
SystemMax. load per cycle
Co-flow6 kg/m2
Split-flow6 kg/m2
RFR hold-down2 kg/m2
Condensate2 kg/m2
UpcoreTM& similar0.5 kg/m2
AmberpackTM& similar0.2 kg/m2
ADITM, ADNTM0.1 kg/m2

Turbidity limits Turbidity is not used much in conjunction with ion exchange systems. See suspended solids above. For floating bed systems without a backwash tower, it was found that 1 NTU is more than what the columns can tolerate.

Temperature

The temperature of the feed water (and of the regenerants) can affect plant performance.
Some effects of a change in temperature are:
  • At low temperature, the operating capacity of all resins decreases.
  • There is an exception to the above rule: at high temperature, the silica removal capacity of a SBA resin decreases, to become virtually zero if the temperature exceeds about 60°C.
  • Styrenic SBA resins of type 2 (e.g. Amberjet 4600) and acrylic SBA resins (e.g. Amberlite IRA458) should not be operated or regenerated at a temperature higher than 35°C. High temperatures may result in problems of rinse and a loss of strong base capacity, which will cause a higher silica leakage and shorter runs.
  • Cation resins can operate at high temperature, sometimes in excess of 100°C. However, the presence of oxygen and trace metals can cause slow oxidation of the resin.
Temperature limits See the table with limits of temperature for all anion exchange resins.
Cation resins can withstand 100°C or even more. Product data sheets give details for all resins.

pH value

Ion exchange resins can tolerate any pH value (0 to 14) without suffering damage, provided strong osmotic shocks due to rapid change of pH or concentration are avoided.
In service however, resins operate only within pH limits: cation resins cannot operate at very low pH, or anion resins at very high pH, because they would be permanently regenerated and unable to exchange other ions. Similarly, the resins are normally not used in very concentrated solutions. This is why in practice the table below should only go up to pH 12 and down to pH 2, which would be 10 meq/L of NaOH or acid respectively.
pH limits
Operating pH range
Type of resinpH range
WAC6 to 14
SAC4 to 14
WBA0 to 7
SBA0 to 9

Organics

Organic matter in water can interfere with ion exchange. The main effect of organics is irreversible fouling of anion exchange resins.
Some problems caused by organics are:
  • Low pH (< 6) of the treated water when organic acids slip through the plant.
  • High conductivity of the treated water.
  • Increased silica leakage.
  • Increased time for rinsing and high volume of waste water.
  • Shorter runs.
The traditional measurement of organics (COD) in natural water uses the potassium permanganate oxidation method, and its result is expressed in mg/L as KMnO4.
Unfortunately, there is no direct correlation between this method and the more modern analysis of TOC (Total Organic Carbon). However, experience has shown that as a rule of thumb, 1 mg/L TOC (1 ppm as C) can be roughly translated into 5.5 mg/L (5.5 ppm) as KMnO4.
Limits of organic loadSee the table for all anion exchange resins (same as temperature table).

Other impurities

Other impurities can also interfere with ion exchange. Some of them are listed below with their effect and possible remedies.
EffectsPrevention/TreatmentLimits
Iron and manganese
  • Pressure drop
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Oxidation and filtration
  • Resin cleaning with HCl
Limits for Fe
Softening and nitrate removal: 1 mg/L
Demineralisation HCl: 15 mg/L
Demineralisation H2SO4: 0.5 mg/L
Condensate polishing: 0.1 mg/L (up to 2 mg/L at startup)
Aluminium
  • Precipitation of Al(OH)3
    (at neutral pH)
  • Al dissolves in acid or alkali
Limits for aluminium
Aluminium usually does not foul resins unless it is a large proportion of the cationic load.
Barium
  • Precipitation of BaSO4
  • Regenerate cation resins with HCl only!
Limits for barium
When Ba is more than 0.1 % of total cations, H2SO4 should be avoided.
Oil
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Check pumps for oil leakage
  • Resin cleaning with non-ionic surfactant
Limits for oil
Virtually zero
0.05 mg/L maximum
Oxidants, chlorine or ozone
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Sodium leakage from anion resins
  • Pressure drop when resin gets "soft"
  • Adjust (reduce) dosage
  • Use activated carbon as pre-treatment
  • Scavenge excess oxidant with bisulphite
Limits for oxidants
See table with acceptable limits.
Polyelectrolytes
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Adjust dosage
  • Clean resin with 4 % NaOH
Limits for polyelectrolytes
No known limits. Caution recommended. In doubt, polyelectrolyte supplier should be asked for harmlessness.
 


Water analysis details

$
0
0

Water analysis details

Introduction

This page covers the water analysis required for ion exchange applications. It is considerably simpler than the analysis you would use to assess the quality of drinking water.
Inorganic componentsThe general feed water characteristics are described in another page, with recommended limits for certain contaminants and parameters. Here, we focus on the inorganic components dissolved in the water.
The picture here (click it for bigger size) shows only the components usually found in surface or deep well water and important for the ion exchange processes.
Some of the components are traditionally grouped:
Ca++ + Mg++= TH
HCO3 + CO3= + OH= m-Alk
Cl + SO4= + NO3= EMA
  • Calcium and magnesium are the Total Hardness (TH).
  • Bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxide are the Total Alkalinity (m-Alk). Usually, natural water does not contain carbonate or hydroxide.
  • Chloride, sulphate and nitrate are the Equivalent Mineral Acidity (EMA), also called Salts of Strong Acids (SSA) or, after cation exchange, Free Mineral Acidity (FMA).
  • When hardness is greater than alkalinity (in meq/L) the bicarbonate hardness is called "temporary hardness" (= TH – Alk) and the remaining hardness is called "permanent hardness". The value of temporary hardness is then equal to that of alkalinity in meq/L.
  • When hardness is smaller than alkalinity (in meq/L) there is no permanent hardness and temporary hardness is equal to total hardness.
  • All natural waters are ionically balanced, i.e. the sum of cations in meq/L is equal to the sum of anions.
Other ions, usually present as traces but sometimes not completely negligible, can be combined with the above:
  • barium (Ba++) and strontium (Sr++) are alkaline earth metals (see important note below) and belong thus to the hardness;
  • for calculation with an ion exchange software, you would also add divalent iron (Fe++), nickel (Ni++) and copper (Cu++) to the hardness group, by convenience;
  • ammonium (NH4+) and potassium (K+) are handled like sodium;
  • lithium (Li+) also reacts like sodium (Na+);
  • phosphate (PO43–) belongs to the EMA;
  • fluoride (F), bromide (Br) and iodide (I) are halogenides and behave like chloride.
Beware that standard resins may have poor affinity for some of these ions, such as Li and F. Also, other possible components, such as aluminium, arsenic and many other metals may be complexed and behave as anions, and sometimes their removal is difficult.
Barium and strontium specific behaviour:
  • The solubility of barium sulphate is only 2 mg/L, thousand times lower than that of calcium sulphate.
  • Ba and Sr are not well removed on WAC resins. These resins have a lower affinity for Ba and Sr than for Ca and Mg. See the table of selectivity values.
  • Ba (and Ra) are very well removed on SAC resins. So well that regeneration may be difficult. Using H2SO4 to regenerate a SAC resin loaded — even partially — with barium may be close to impossible.
.

Units of concentration and capacity

Because we need to know the number of ions to be exchanged — their mass is not helpful here — the concentration of all these ions must be converted into chemical "equivalent" units, of which the international unit is eq·kg–1, which we traditionally re-name as equivalents per litre eq/L, and in case of low concentrations, meq/L. Other units of concentrations are still used regionally:
 
Units of concentration
(per volume of water)
NameAbbreviation
meq/L
ppm as calcium carbonate1 ppm as CaCO3=0.02
French degree1 °f=0.2
German hardness degree1 °dH=0.357
Grain as CaCO3 per US gallon1 gr as CaCO3/gal=0.342
 
Units of capacity
(per volume of resin)
NameAbbreviation
eq/L
Gram as CaCO3 per litre1 g as CaCO3/L=0.02
French degree1 °f=0.0002
Gram as CaO per litreg CaO/L=0.0357
kgr as CaCO3 per cubic footkgr CaCO3/ft3=0.0458
The complete tables of conversion can be seen in a separate window.
The unit of mole should be avoided altogether in ion exchange, as it does not take valence into account and brings only confusion. For reference: 1 eq = 1 mole / valence.
For those curious, a mole contains 6.02×1023 atoms, ions or molecules. This big number is called Avogadro constant.
Note: in Germany and some other Central and Eastern European countries, mval/L and val/L are used instead of meq/L and eq/L.

Examples

The table shows the most common ions in water and their equivalent mass.
NameIong/moleg/eq
CalciumCa++4020
MagnesiumMg++2412
SodiumNa+2323
PotassiumK+3939
AmmoniumNH4+1818
ChlorideCl35.535.5
SulphateSO4=9648
NitrateNO36262
BicarbonateHCO36161
CarbonateCO3=6030
In water, the concentrations are expressed in meq/L. For instance, if you have a calcium concentration of 90 mg/L, the equivalent concentration is 90/20=4.5 meq/L.
Silica (SiO2), not ionised in normal water, has a molar mass of 60. For ion exchange (with a strongly basic resin in OH form), it is considered monovalent, so the equivalent mass is also 60.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is very slightly ionised in normal water, and is also considered monovalent, with a molar and equivalent mass of 44. The equilibrium between CO2 and HCO3 is shown at the bottom of this page.
Don't be confused: 1 equivalent CaCO3 (50 g), for instance, contains 1 eq Ca (20 g) and 1 eq CO3 (30 g). You don't add these (one eq cation and one eq anion): it is still only 1 eq CaCO3, not 2!

A balanced analysis ?

Water is electrically neutral, even when it contains large quantities of ions. This means that the number of anionic charges is exactly the same as that of cationic charges. Otherwise you would have an electric shock when putting your hand in water. Therefore, once you have carefully converted all the elements of your water analysis in meq/L units, the sum of anions should be the same as the sum of cations. The only exceptions to that rule are:
  • A small difference due to imprecision in the analytical procedures is acceptable as long as the difference between total cations and total anions is less than 3 %.
  • At high pH (> 8.2), e.g. in the presence of ammonia or after lime decarbonation, there will be hydroxide or carbonate ions. Hydroxide ions are usually not reported separately. Carbonate ions are not always reported. In such a case, you would have more cations than anions.
  • At low pH (say < 6.8), the water may contain either free mineral acidity (very rare for natural water) or free carbon dioxide, both producing H ions which are usually not reported separately.

An example of water analysis

Here is an analysis as required to calculate an ion exchange plant (softening, demineralisation, de-alkalisation, nitrate removal). This is a real water (1), from the Oise river, in France, dated 28 September 2005.
Cationsmg/Lmeq/LAnionsmg/Lmeq/L
Ca++934.65Cl671.89
Mg++121.00SO4=330.69
Na+261.13NO360.10
K+40.10HCO32594.23
Total cations6.90Total anions6.91

SiO22.40.04
pH value7.04Free CO2451.02
Conductivity µS/cm627Anion load7.97
Organic matter (2)2.6 
Temperature °C16
(1)Important note: To calculate an ion exchange plant, a real water analysis should always be used, not an average. If necessary, two or three analyses should be considered when the salinity shows seasonal variations.
(2)Organic matter (COD) is important because it can foul anion exchange resins. It is usually expressed in mg/L as KMnO4.
This particular analysis is typical of Western Europe, with relatively high hardness and alkalinity, and little silica. Silica and free carbon dioxide are removed by the strong base anion resin in a demineralisation system. However, carbon dioxide can be reduced with a degasifier after cation exchange to reduce the anion load.

m- and p-Alkalinity

Alkalinity includes following anions:
  • Hydrogencarbonate HCO3, often called bicarbonate
  • Carbonate CO3=
  • Hydroxide OH
Alkalinity in water is measured by titration with an acid. Two different indicators are used:
  • Phenolphthalein changing colour at pH 8.3 measures p-alkalinity
  • Methylorange changing colour at pH 4.5 measures m-alkalinity
The total alkalinity is m-Alk, and can include OH, CO3, and HCO3 ions. p-Alk measures only the OH and half of the CO3 ions. When the pH value of the water is smaller than 8.3, p-Alk is equal to zero, and the water can contain only bicarbonate. At a higher pH, carbonate can exist. At even higher pH values, hydroxide ions can exist, but then there will be no bicarbonate ions left, as those would combine with OH to produce carbonate ions and water:
HCO3 + OH---> CO3= + H2O
You will have thus with increasing pH either only bicarbonate, or bicarbonate + carbonate, or only carbonate, or carbonate + hydroxide, or only hydroxide. This gives the following table, from which the components of alkalinity can be calculated:
 
Ion
p = 0p < m/2p = m/2m/2 < p < mp = m
OH=0002 p - mp
CO3=02 pm = 2 p2 (m - p)0
HCO3=mm - 2 p000
The values in the table are expressed in equivalent units, i.e. in meq/L, ppm CaCO3, French or German degrees, not in mol/L or mg/L!
Let us see examples with values in meq/L, with waters of increasing pH
 
Example 1m-Alk = 5p-Alk = 0
OH = 0CO3 = 0HCO3 = 5

Example 2m-Alk = 5p-Alk = 1.5
OH = 0CO3 = 3HCO3 = 2

Example 3m-Alk = 5p-Alk = 3
OH = 1CO3 = 4HCO3 = 0


If p-Alkalinity is > 0, which means the pH value is more than 8.3, you don't have free CO2, because it would combine with CO3 to produce HCO3.
CO2 + CO3= + H2O ---> 2 HCO3

Free CO2 and pH

pH vs Alk to CO2 ratioA low pH value means that there are H+ ions in solution. In the presence of bicarbonate, the following equilibrium exists:
H+ + HCO3<---> H2CO3<---> CO2 + H2O
The two pictures illustrate this equilibrium. Use the second graph to verify that the water analysis given by your customer makes sense, and to estimate the concentration of free carbon dioxide if it is not given. You also see there that at a pH of more than 7.2, this concentration is practically negligible.
When treating RO permeate, however, this relationship is very important, as CO2 is the largest part of the anion load on the resin. In this case, you can use the third graph, which is a close-up of the other one for low concentrations.

CO2 vs pH and Alk  CO2 vs pH and Alk

Limits of oxidants

$
0
0
ION EXCHANGE
Update 5 July 2010

Limits of oxidants

The table shows the maximum acceptable concentration of chlorine, chlorine dioxide or ozone in water, for conventional water treatment applications. It is not valid for UPW, CPP etc.
Excess oxidants can be neutralised with sulphite or dithionite salts or sulphur dioxide. Excess chlorine can be removed by an activated carbon filter.
The dosage of chlorine or chlorine dioxide has a "persistent" effect, i.e. the oxidant remains in water for a long time. Ozone, on the other hand, tends to disappear rapidly.
Resin typeMaximum
Cl2
mg/L
Maximum
ClO2
mg/L
Maximum
O3
mg/L
WAC gel 1.0 0.5 0.8
WAC macro 0.05 0.02 0.04
SAC gel 0.20 0.10 0.15
SAC macroporous 0.30 0.15 0.30
WBA (all) 0.05 0.02 0.04
SBA styrenic gel 0.10 0.02 0.04
SBA acrylic gel 0.10 0.05 0.04
SBA styrenic macroporous 0.10 0.05 0.04
SBA acrylic macroporous 0.10 0.02 0.04
SBA nitrate selective 0.10 0.05 0.04
The above values are not guarantee numbers, but only "believed to be safe" in the present state of our knowledge.
Sometimes, chloramines are used instead of chlorine for disinfection. Because the dosage is much higher (expressed as Cl2) and chloramines are not removed well by activated carbon (only 50 % removal compared to about 90 % for free chlorine), chloramines have a strong degradation effect on the resin.



Feed water and some recommended limits for ion exchange systems

$
0
0

Feed water
and some recommended limits for ion exchange systems

Introduction

Ion exchange resins exchange ions. Not a surprise, but the composition of the feed water affects plant performance. It is therefore essential to know precisely the water composition of the feed to the ion exchange system.
The following components and characteristics should be known:
  • Salinity (see also the separate page on water analysis details)
  • Suspended solids and turbidity
  • Temperature
  • pH value
  • Organic substances in the water
  • Other impurities, such as iron, manganese, aluminium, oil, polyelectrolytes...
We will examine the effect of all above parameters and try to set practical limits for each.

Salinity (water analysis)

This is the single most important item to estimate the performance of an ion exchange system. It is also one of the first things to check when plant performance deteriorates. You cannot rely on an analysis that was made months or years ago. Some effects of a change in salinity are:

Type of changeEffect
Higher salt contentShorter runs, lower throughput, sometimes lower quality of the treated water
Lower salt contentLonger runs, higher throughput
Change in ionic balance (e.g. less bicarbonate, more chloride)Change in treated water quality. The resin volumes become unbalanced, the degasifier has less or more carbon dioxide to handle
Higher ratio of silica to total anionsThis may increase silica leakage and require a change in regeneration conditions.

The picture below is a schematic representation of a water analysis, with cations and anions. A good water analysis must be balanced.
Feed water analysis
Click on picture to see it enlarged with more details.

If the water analysis varies according to season, plant performance should be re-assessed, and perhaps operating conditions re-adjusted, to reflect the seasonal variations. If you don't analyse the water yourself, give a sample to a reputable laboratory for testing.y.
When re-assessing the performance of a plant, or optimising it, it is recommended to use the most probable analysis for the basic calculation, then to re-run the calculation with seasonal analyses to estimate plant throughput under various conditions. All the water analyses should be real, not maxima, averages or minima.
We strongly recommend that you should update the expected performance of the plant based on actual operating conditions. You should collect the necessary data:
  • Water analysis (after pre-treatment)
  • Resin types and volumes
  • Regeneration method (co-flow, reverse flow, packed beds)
  • Regenerant quantities and concentrations
Salinity limitsIon exchange is the perfect technology for low concentrations. At high salinity, the cycles become very short, regenerant consumption increases and in extreme cases the water required for regeneration may exceed the volume of treated water. As a guideline, a salinity of 20 meq/L (1000 ppm as CaCO3) seems to be the high limit, with some exceptions. Higher salinity water is probably best treated with RO.
Sea water cannot be demineralised by ion exchange, as the resins would be exhausted in less than 3 bed volumes.

Suspended solids and turbidity

Ideally, the feed water to an ion exchange vessel should be perfectly clear and free of suspended solids. It is essential to ensure that mechanical filters installed ahead of an ion exchange system operate properly. Insufficient filtration resulting in excessive suspended solids may cause:
  • Channeling of the resin bed, resulting in high leakage and short runs.
  • High pressure drop values, sometimes resulting in flow reduction, and requiring frequent backwash of the unit.
Suspended solids are traditionally measured by filtration on a 0.45 µm filter and expressed as dry mass. The tolerated amount of suspended solids varies according to the ion exchange technology and to the run length. If the resins can be easily backwashed and cleaned, a higher quantity of suspended solids is acceptable.
  • As co-flow regenerated vessels can be backwashed before each regeneration, they are not very sensitive to suspended solids, and several mg/L (ppm) are usually acceptable.
  • In all cases, if the system has long cycles, the accumulated suspended solids may cause pressure drop problems even if the amount of suspended solids in the feed is relatively low.
  • Reverse flow regenerated vessels are not backwashed at the end of every cycle, and the pressure drop should be monitored closely to determine when a resin backwash is necessary.
  • Packed bed units are more sensitive to suspended solids, as they cannot be backwashed in situ. In general, the tolerated suspended solids should be well below 1 mg/L (1 ppm).
    • In Upcore plants, the suspended solids land on the surface of the resin bed, and some are backwashed away during regeneration.
    • In Amberpack and floating bed, the suspended solids enter in a slightly fluidised part of the bed and accumulate there. A higher quantity is tolerated because it migrates partially upward, but this quantity cannot be removed until the resin is taken out to the backwash tower.
Turbidity (cloudiness or haziness) is measured in NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units). There is no fixed relation between turbidity and suspended solids.
Limits for suspended solids There is no simple number here: the most sensible way is to calculate the load of solids during one cycle and to express the result per square metre of vessel (cross-section). Here some suggestions:
Suspended solids
SystemMax. load per cycle
Co-flow6 kg/m2
Split-flow6 kg/m2
RFR hold-down2 kg/m2
Condensate2 kg/m2
UpcoreTM& similar0.5 kg/m2
AmberpackTM& similar0.2 kg/m2
ADITM, ADNTM0.1 kg/m2

Turbidity limits Turbidity is not used much in conjunction with ion exchange systems. See suspended solids above. For floating bed systems without a backwash tower, it was found that 1 NTU is more than what the columns can tolerate.

Temperature

The temperature of the feed water (and of the regenerants) can affect plant performance.
Some effects of a change in temperature are:
  • At low temperature, the operating capacity of all resins decreases.
  • There is an exception to the above rule: at high temperature, the silica removal capacity of a SBA resin decreases, to become virtually zero if the temperature exceeds about 60°C.
  • Styrenic SBA resins of type 2 (e.g. Amberjet 4600) and acrylic SBA resins (e.g. Amberlite IRA458) should not be operated or regenerated at a temperature higher than 35°C. High temperatures may result in problems of rinse and a loss of strong base capacity, which will cause a higher silica leakage and shorter runs.
  • Cation resins can operate at high temperature, sometimes in excess of 100°C. However, the presence of oxygen and trace metals can cause slow oxidation of the resin.
Temperature limits See the table with limits of temperature for all anion exchange resins.
Cation resins can withstand 100°C or even more. Product data sheets give details for all resins.

pH value

Ion exchange resins can tolerate any pH value (0 to 14) without suffering damage, provided strong osmotic shocks due to rapid change of pH or concentration are avoided.
In service however, resins operate only within pH limits: cation resins cannot operate at very low pH, or anion resins at very high pH, because they would be permanently regenerated and unable to exchange other ions. Similarly, the resins are normally not used in very concentrated solutions. This is why in practice the table below should only go up to pH 12 and down to pH 2, which would be 10 meq/L of NaOH or acid respectively.
pH limits
Operating pH range
Type of resinpH range
WAC6 to 14
SAC4 to 14
WBA0 to 7
SBA0 to 9

Organics

Organic matter in water can interfere with ion exchange. The main effect of organics is irreversible fouling of anion exchange resins.
Some problems caused by organics are:
  • Low pH (< 6) of the treated water when organic acids slip through the plant.
  • High conductivity of the treated water.
  • Increased silica leakage.
  • Increased time for rinsing and high volume of waste water.
  • Shorter runs.
The traditional measurement of organics (COD) in natural water uses the potassium permanganate oxidation method, and its result is expressed in mg/L as KMnO4.
Unfortunately, there is no direct correlation between this method and the more modern analysis of TOC (Total Organic Carbon). However, experience has shown that as a rule of thumb, 1 mg/L TOC (1 ppm as C) can be roughly translated into 5.5 mg/L (5.5 ppm) as KMnO4.
Limits of organic loadSee the table for all anion exchange resins (same as temperature table).

Other impurities

Other impurities can also interfere with ion exchange. Some of them are listed below with their effect and possible remedies.
EffectsPrevention/TreatmentLimits
Iron and manganese
  • Pressure drop
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Oxidation and filtration
  • Resin cleaning with HCl
Limits for Fe
Softening and nitrate removal: 1 mg/L
Demineralisation HCl: 15 mg/L
Demineralisation H2SO4: 0.5 mg/L
Condensate polishing: 0.1 mg/L (up to 2 mg/L at startup)
Aluminium
  • Precipitation of Al(OH)3
    (at neutral pH)
  • Al dissolves in acid or alkali
Limits for aluminium
Aluminium usually does not foul resins unless it is a large proportion of the cationic load.
Barium
  • Precipitation of BaSO4
  • Regenerate cation resins with HCl only!
Limits for barium
When Ba is more than 0.1 % of total cations, H2SO4 should be avoided.
Oil
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Check pumps for oil leakage
  • Resin cleaning with non-ionic surfactant
Limits for oil
Virtually zero
0.05 mg/L maximum
Oxidants, chlorine or ozone
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Sodium leakage from anion resins
  • Pressure drop when resin gets "soft"
  • Adjust (reduce) dosage
  • Use activated carbon as pre-treatment
  • Scavenge excess oxidant with bisulphite
Limits for oxidants
See table with acceptable limits.
Polyelectrolytes
  • Short cycles (capacity loss)
  • Bad quality (high leakage)
  • Adjust dosage
  • Clean resin with 4 % NaOH
Limits for polyelectrolytes
No known limits. Caution recommended. In doubt, polyelectrolyte supplier should be asked for harmlessness.
 

.As the GV solution is corrosive, it may corrode/erode the vessels pipelines etc. at the operating temperatures and pressure.

$
0
0

With best regards,
 “Join the race to make the world a better place”.(2017)
Dr. AMAR NATH GIRI
EHSQ , NFCL
M.Sc. -Environmental Science,Ph.D -Environmental Science law& DIPLOMA AS - P.G.D.E.P.L,CES, DCA,
EX IIM LUCKNOW FELLOW, EX RESEARCH SCIENTIST
IGIDR-MUMBAI 
9912511918
amarnathgiri@nagarjunagroup.com
http://www.nagarjunafertilizers.com
http://www.gprofonline.com/members/Default.aspx
EHSQ BLOG : http://dramarnathgiri.blogspot.in/?view=magazine

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Amar Giri<goswami248@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM
Subject: GV RELATED
To: PCmohan <PCmohan@nagarjunagroup.com>, varaju <varaju@nagarjunagroup.com>
Cc: Laboratory Kakinada <laboratory@nagarjunagroup.com>


Dear Sir, wish you a very good morning , I am attaching some paper which will be fruitful for our CO2 REMOVAL SYSTEM & TO FIND OUT THE PROBLEMS & ITS APPROPRIATE SOLUTION . Here the Lean od has been drastically observed , we must have to find out the other composition  as carbon, as iron .As the GV solution is corrosive, it may corrode/erode the vessels pipelines etc. at the operating temperatures and pressure. 
1A CASE STUDY OF CO2 REMOVAL SYSTEMPROBLEMS/FAILURES IN AN AMMONIA PLANT2. Revamping out-of-date “hot pot” units: Better efficiency, less energy
(L.Tomasi, Giammarco-Vetrocoke s.r.l ., Venice, Italy)


With best regards,
(2014)
Dr. AMAR NATH GIRI
EHSQ , NFCL
amarnathgiri@nagarjunagroup.com
M.Sc.,Ph.D & DIPLOMA AS - P.G.D.E.P.L,CES, DCA,
EX IIM LUCKNOW FELLOW, EX RESEARCH SCIENTIST
IGIDR-MUMBAI 
EHSQ BLOG :http://dramarnathgiri.blogspot.in/?view=magazine

CHEMISTRY OF GV PROCESS

Synthesis section Decomposition section Recovery section Crystallizations and Priling Sections National Fertilizers Limited Bathinda

Strategic management

Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada Dated :Jan 30, 2017

$
0
0










Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada    Dated :Jan 30, 2017
Kakinada
Past 24 Hours Weather Data
Maximum Temp(oC) (Recorded. on 30/01/17)29.6
Departure from Normal(oC)0
Minimum Temp (oC) (Recorded. on 30/01/17)21.2
Departure from Normal(oC)0
24 Hours Rainfall (mm) (Recorded from 0830 hrs IST
of yesterday to 0830 hrs IST of today)
NIL
Todays Sunset (IST)17:56
Tommorows Sunrise (IST)06:33
Moonset (IST)20:08
Moonrise (IST)08:06
7 Day's Forecast
Date Min Temp Max Temp Weather
30-Jan 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
31-Jan 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
01-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
02-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
03-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
04-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
05-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze

Kakinada
Past 24 Hours Weather Data
Maximum Temp(oC) (Recorded. on 30/01/17)29.6
Departure from Normal(oC)0
Minimum Temp (oC) (Recorded. on 30/01/17)21.2
Departure from Normal(oC)0
24 Hours Rainfall (mm) (Recorded from 0830 hrs IST
of yesterday to 0830 hrs IST of today)
NIL
Todays Sunset (IST)17:56
Tommorows Sunrise (IST)06:33
Moonset (IST)20:08
Moonrise (IST)08:06
7 Day's Forecast
Date Min Temp Max Temp Weather
30-Jan 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
31-Jan 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
01-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
02-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
03-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
04-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
05-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze

  








Bacteriological analysis of drinking water by MPN method.


colony-forming unit (CFU or cfu) is a measure of viable bacterial or fungal cells.

$
0
0

Rafik Karaman
Rafik Karaman· Al-Quds University
Dear Ozge,
For calculating the colony forming unit bacteria, please see the following text:
colony-forming unit (CFU or cfu) is a measure of viable bacterial or fungal cells. In direct microscopic counts (cell counting using haemocytometer) where all cells, dead and living, are counted,but CFU measures only viable cells. For convenience the results are given as CFU/mL (colony-forming units per milliliter) for liquids, and CFU/g (colony-forming units per gram) for solids. CFU can be calculated using miles and misra method, it is useful to determine the microbiological load and magnitude of infection in blood and other samples.
Example:
Calculate the number of bacteria (CFU) per milliliter or gram of sample by dividing the number of colonies by the dilution factor The number of colonies per ml reported should reflect the precision of the method and should not include more than two significant figures.
The CFU/ml can be calculated using the formula:
cfu/ml = (no. of colonies x dilution factor) / volume of culture plate
For example, suppose the plate of the 10^6 dilution yielded a count of 130 colonies. Then, the number of bacteria in 1 ml of the original sample can be calculated as follows:
Bacteria/ml = (130) x (10^6) = 1.3 × 10^8 or 130,000,000.
CFU/mL Practice Problems - CFU/mL Calculation Examples
Problem 1:
Five ml of Bacterial Culture is added to 45 ml of sterile diluent. From this suspension, two serial, 1/100 dilutions are made, and 0.1 ml is plated onto Plate Count Agar from the last dilution. After incubation, 137 colonies are counted on the plate. Calculate CFU/mL of the original Sample?
Answer:
First thing we need to know is the Dilution Factor, or how much the original sample is diluted:
here Initially 5mL in 45mL = Final Volume / Sample volume = 50/5 = 10.
Then two serial dilutions of 1/100.
Total Dilution Factor = 10 * 100 *100 = 10^5
CFU/mL = cfu/ml = (no. of colonies x dilution factor) / volume of culture plate
= (137 * 10^5)/0.1
=1.37*10^8
So Total colony forming units = 1.37*10^8 CFU/mL
Converting CFU/mL to Log value
For example,
Total colony forming units = 1.37*10^8 CFU/mL and you want to convert it into Log value,
Just take Log(CFU/mL)
Here, log (1.37*10^8) = 8.13924922.
Useful for expressing log reduction of microbes / biologic log reduction.

Total Viable Count

$
0
0

Total Viable Count


Total Viable Count (TVC), also known as (ACC) gives a quantitative idea about the presence of microorganisms such as bacteria, yeast and mold in a sample. To be specific, the count actually represents the number of colony forming units (cfu) per g (or per ml) of the sample.
A TVC is achieved by plating dilutions of the culture until 30-300 colonies exist on a single plate.
A high TVC count is usually attributable to poor quality.
In Food Microbiology is used as a benchmark for the evaluation of the shelf-life of foodstuffs. Its scope is as an assessment tool rather than focus towards a specific organism.

Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada Dated :Jan 31, 2017

$
0
0







Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada    Dated :Jan 31, 2017
 
Kakinada
Past 24 Hours Weather Data
Maximum Temp(oC) (Recorded. on 31/01/17)31.1
Departure from Normal(oC)1
Minimum Temp (oC) (Recorded. on 31/01/17)21.2
Departure from Normal(oC)0
24 Hours Rainfall (mm) (Recorded from 0830 hrs IST
of yesterday to 0830 hrs IST of today)
NIL
Todays Sunset (IST)17:57
Tommorows Sunrise (IST)06:32
Moonset (IST)21:03
Moonrise (IST)08:50
7 Day's Forecast
Date Min Temp Max Temp Weather
31-Jan 21.0 30.0 Generally cloudy sky with haze
01-Feb 21.0 30.0 Generally cloudy sky with haze
02-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
03-Feb 21.0 30.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
04-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
05-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze
06-Feb 21.0 31.0 Partly cloudy sky with haze

  


Tuesday, January 31, 2017


ActualAverage Record
Temperature
Mean Temperature26 °C-
Max Temperature31 °C- - ()
Min Temperature22 °C- - ()
Cooling Degree Days14
Growing Degree Days30 (Base 50)
Moisture
Dew Point20 °C
Average Humidity68
Maximum Humidity91
Minimum Humidity46
Precipitation
Precipitation0.0 mm- - ()
Sea Level Pressure
Sea Level Pressure1013.75 hPa
Wind
Wind Speed1 km/h ()
Max Wind Speed6 km/h
Max Gust Speed-
Visibility7.7 kilometers
Events 
T = Trace of Precipitation, MM = Missing ValueSource: Averaged Metar Reports



Daily Weather History Graph

Hourly Weather History & Observations

Time (IST)Temp.Dew PointHumidityPressureVisibilityWind DirWind SpeedGust SpeedPrecipEventsConditions
2:30 AM22 °C20 °C84%1014 hPa4 kmCalmCalm- -   Clear
5:30 AM21 °C20 °C91%1014 hPa4 kmCalmCalm- -   Clear
8:30 AM24 °C21 °C84%1016 hPa10 kmCalmCalm- -   Partly Cloudy
11:30 AM27 °C21 °C64%1015 hPa10 kmCalmCalm- -   Partly Cloudy
2:30 PM30 °C20 °C46%1013 hPa10 kmEast5.6 km/h /  - -   Scattered Clouds
5:30 PM28 °C19 °C48%1012 hPa10 kmEast5.6 km/h /  - -   Scattered Clouds
8:30 PM28 °C19 °C48%1012 hPa10 kmEast5.6 km/h /  - -   Scattered Clouds
11:30 PM23 °C20 °C79%1014 hPa4 kmCalmCalm- -   Scattered Clouds

EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS IN THE MONTH OF JANUARY

$
0
0

KAKINADA

EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS IN THE MONTH OF JANUARY
Year
Temperature(oC)
Rainfall (mm)
Highest
Maximum(Date)
Lowest
Minimum(Date)
24 Hours Highest
(Date)
Monthly Total
2016
33.0(30)
18.2(18)
0
0
2015
32.4 ( 05 )
16.0 ( 12 )
0
0
2014
31.9(23)
17.6(02)
1.0(14)
1.0
2013
31.9(14)
16.8(13)
1.6(29)
1.6
2012
32.0(22)
14.2(15)
3.0(31)
7.1
2011
31.5(18)
16.1(16)
0.0
0.0
2010
32.0(15)
18.1(05)
0.5(10)
0.5
2009
32.7(29)
19.2(21)
0.4(03)
0.5
2008
32.0(14)
15.7(03)
0.0
0.0
2007
32.0(23)
18.2(31)
0.0
0.0
ALL TIME RECORD
34.6(29/1991)
12.0(06/1962)
78.2(22/1921)
83.3(1921)

CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE
PERIOD: 1981-2010
Month
Mean
Temperature(oC)
Mean
Total
Rainfall
(mm)
Mean
Number of Rainy
Days
Mean Number of days with
Daily
Minimum
Daily
Maximum
HAIL
Thunder
FOG
SQUALL
Jan
20.3
29.2
12.6
0.9
0
0.1
0.1
0
Feb
21.7
31.2
10.3
1.1
0
0
0
0
Mar
24.0
34.0
7.5
0.5
0
0.7
0.1
0
Apr
26.2
36.2
16.4
1.1
0
2.1
0
0
May
27.8
37.5
42.3
2.8
0
5.2
0
0
Jun
27.3
35.8
122.8
7.1
0
5.4
0
0
Jul
26.2
32.9
175.4
10.9
0
5.2
0
0
Aug
25.9
32.2
176.9
10.2
0
4.7
0
0
Sep
25.9
32.7
199.4
9.1
0
7.5
0
0
Oct
24.8
31.9
243.4
9.0
0
6.8
0
0
Nov
22.5
30.4
98.8
3.8
0
1.3
0
0
Dec
20.3
29.2
10.7
0.9
0
0
0
0
Annual
24.4
32.8
1116.6
57.5
0
39
0.1
0



Month of January, 2017 weather condition of KAKINADA

$
0
0

MaxAvgMinSum
Temperature 
Max Temperature31 °C29 °C23 °C
Mean Temperature26 °C24 °C23 °C
Min Temperature23 °C20 °C17 °C
Degree Days 
Heating Degree Days (base 65)0000
Cooling Degree Days (base 65)14119338
Growing Degree Days (base 50)302624811
Dew Point 
Dew Point23 °C19 °C13 °C
Precipitation 
Precipitation0.0 mm0.0 mm0.0 mm0.00 mm
Snowdepth - - - -
Wind 
Wind15 km/h2 km/h0 km/h
Gust Wind - - -
Sea Level Pressure 
Sea Level Pressure1019 hPa1015 hPa1010 hPa

Monthly Weather History Graph

 

Monthly Weather History Graph


Daily Weather History & Observations



































2017
Temp. (°C)
Dew Point (°C)
Humidity (%)
Sea Level Press. (hPa)
Visibility (km)
Wind (km/h)
Precip. (mm)
Events
Jan
high
avg
low
high
avg
low
high
avg
low
high
avg
low
high
avg
low
high
avg
high
sum

29
24
20
22
21
20
94
76
54
1016
1014.5
1013
10
6.3
4
6
2
-
0

29
24
19
21
20
20
98
77
53
1016
1014.63
1014
10
6.3
4
7
2
-
0

30
24
19
21
20
20
97
75
50
1016
1014.12
1012
10
7
4
6
1
-
0

29
25
21
22
20
16
89
71
47
1016
1013.88
1012
10
7
4
6
1
-
0

29
25
21
20
20
18
88
68
46
1016
1013.37
1012
10
6.3
4
9
1
-
0

29
25
21
21
19
18
82
66
51
1015
1013.25
1012
10
6.3
4
7
2
-
0

29
24
19
19
18
18
81
61
45
1014
1012.12
1010
10
7
4
11
3
-
0

28
24
19
20
19
17
84
66
50
1014
1011.63
1010
10
7
4
9
2
-
0

29
24
19
20
19
19
87
69
46
1014
1012.12
1011
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

29
24
19
19
19
18
89
69
48
1014
1011.88
1010
10
7
4
6
1
-
0

29
24
19
20
19
18
87
72
51
1014
1012.25
1011
10
6.3
4
7
1
-
0

29
24
19
21
19
19
89
72
46
1014
1012.37
1011
10
6.3
4
6
1
-
0

29
24
19
21
19
18
94
72
46
1015
1013.12
1012
10
6.3
4
6
0
-
0

28
24
20
21
20
21
89
75
58
1017
1014.75
1013
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

28
24
20
22
20
19
86
72
51
1018
1016.12
1014
10
7
4
11
2
-
0

28
24
19
20
19
19
92
71
46
1018
1015.5
1013
10
6.3
4
6
1
-
0

29
24
18
20
18
14
90
67
30
1017
1015.37
1014
10
6.3
4
7
2
-
0

29
23
17
20
18
16
89
66
37
1018
1017
1016
10
7.7
4
7
2
-
0

29
24
19
20
17
13
85
59
36
1019
1017.25
1016
10
7.7
4
9
3
-
0

30
24
18
19
16
13
63
51
31
1018
1016.38
1014
10
7
4
15
4
-
0

30
25
20
20
19
17
74
63
52
1019
1017.13
1015
10
7.7
4
15
5
-
0

29
24
20
21
20
18
78
68
52
1020
1017.63
1016
10
7
4
11
3
-
0

29
24
19
22
19
17
90
68
43
1019
1017.25
1015
10
6.3
4
9
1
-
0

29
24
19
21
19
18
87
67
44
1018
1017.12
1016
10
6.3
4
9
2
-
0

29
24
19
21
19
16
81
68
52
1019
1017.25
1016
10
6.3
4
11
3
-
0

29
24
20
22
20
19
85
73
59
1018
1016.75
1015
10
7
4
9
4
-
0

30
25
20
24
22
20
89
76
55
1016
1015.12
1014
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

30
25
20
23
21
20
92
74
46
1017
1014.88
1013
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

29
25
21
23
22
20
92
75
46
1017
1015.5
1014
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

29
25
21
22
20
19
95
72
53
1017
1014.88
1013
10
7
4
7
2
-
0

31
26
22
21
20
19
91
68
46
1016
1013.75
1012
10
7.7
4
6
1
-
0
































Viewing all 10191 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images